Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format (grpc依赖)
https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
72 lines
3.7 KiB
72 lines
3.7 KiB
|
|
μpb Design |
|
---------- |
|
|
|
μpb has the following design goals: |
|
|
|
- C89 compatible. |
|
- small code size (both for the core library and generated messages). |
|
- fast performance (hundreds of MB/s). |
|
- idiomatic for C programs. |
|
- easy to wrap in high-level languages (Python, Ruby, Lua, etc) with |
|
good performance and all standard protobuf features. |
|
- hands-off about memory management, allowing for easy integration |
|
with existing VMs and/or garbage collectors. |
|
- offers binary ABI compatibility between apps, generated messages, and |
|
the core library (doesn't require re-generating messages or recompiling |
|
your application when the core library changes). |
|
- provides all features that users expect from a protobuf library |
|
(generated messages in C, reflection, text format, etc.). |
|
- layered, so the core is small and doesn't require descriptors. |
|
- tidy about symbol references, so that any messages or features that |
|
aren't used by a C program can have their code GC'd by the linker. |
|
- possible to use protobuf binary format without leaking message/field |
|
names into the binary. |
|
|
|
μpb accomplishes these goals by keeping a very small core that does not contain |
|
descriptors. We need some way of knowing what fields are in each message and |
|
where they live, but instead of descriptors, we keep a small/lightweight summary |
|
of the .proto file. We call this a `upb_msglayout`. It contains the bare |
|
minimum of what we need to know to parse and serialize protobuf binary format |
|
into our internal representation for messages, `upb_msg`. |
|
|
|
The core then contains functions to parse/serialize a message, given a `upb_msg*` |
|
and a `const upb_msglayout*`. |
|
|
|
This approach is similar to [nanopb](https://github.com/nanopb/nanopb) which |
|
also compiles message definitions to a compact, internal representation without |
|
names. However nanopb does not aim to be a fully-featured library, and has no |
|
support for text format, JSON, or descriptors. μpb is unique in that it has a |
|
small core similar to nanopb (though not quite as small), but also offers a |
|
full-featured protobuf library for applications that want reflection, text |
|
format, JSON format, etc. |
|
|
|
Without descriptors, the core doesn't have access to field names, so it cannot |
|
parse/serialize to protobuf text format or JSON. Instead this functionality |
|
lives in separate modules that depend on the module implementing descriptors. |
|
With the descriptor module we can parse/serialize binary descriptors and |
|
validate that they follow all the rules of protobuf schemas. |
|
|
|
To provide binary compatibility, we version the structs that generated messages |
|
use to create a `upb_msglayout*`. The current initializers are |
|
`upb_msglayout_msginit_v1`, `upb_msglayout_fieldinit_v1`, etc. Then |
|
`upb_msglayout*` uses these as its internal representation. If upb changes its |
|
internal representation for a `upb_msglayout*`, it will also include code to |
|
convert the old representation to the new representation. This will use some |
|
more memory/CPU at runtime to convert between the two, but apps that statically |
|
link μpb will never need to worry about this. |
|
|
|
TODO |
|
---- |
|
|
|
1. revise our generated code until it is in a state where we feel comfortable |
|
committing to API/ABI stability for it. In particular there is an open |
|
question of whether non-ABI-compatible field accesses should have a |
|
fastpath different from the ABI-compatible field access. |
|
1. Add missing features (maps, extensions, unknown fields). |
|
1. Flesh out C++ wrappers. |
|
1. *(lower-priority)*: revise all of the existing encoders/decoders and |
|
handlers. We probably will want to keep handlers, since they let us decouple |
|
encoders/decoders from `upb_msg`, but we need to simplify all of that a LOT. |
|
Likely we will want to make handlers only per-message instead of per-field, |
|
except for variable-length fields.
|
|
|