Also added a standalone formatter test, for confidence.
Have validated that undoing the change in 835fb947 breaks the tests
(i.e. we are still testing that the change is required).
(There are documentation changes and new fields in descriptor.proto that have resulted
in changes to the serialized descriptor, but no breaking changes for C#.)
Overview of changes:
- A new C#-specific command-line option, legacy_enum_values to revert to the old behavior
- When legacy_enum_values isn't specified, we strip the enum name as a prefix, and PascalCase the value name
- A new attribute within the C# code so that we can always tell the original in-proto name
Regenerating the C# code with legacy_enum_values leads to code which still compiles and works - but
there's more still to do.
I've moved both protoc.exe and the proto files out of Google.Protobuf.
The .proto files aren't a slam-dunk, but it feels like they belong with protoc as you'd *use* them with protoc.
It's not clear to me whether we really need both an x86 and x64 version of protoc.exe, as x86 would work on 64-bit Windows anyway. Discuss :)
This makes no externally visible behavioral changes. Internally and non-behaviorally:
- We use a field (compiler-generated) to store the JsonName to avoid recomputing it repeatedly
- The documentation for JsonName is updated to reflect the meaning better
- Readonly autoprops and expression-bodied properties used where possible
This detects:
- An end-group tag with the wrong field number (doesn't match the start-group field)
- An end-group tag with no preceding start-group tag
Fixes issue #688.
Recently, descriptor.proto gained a GeneratedCodeInfo message, which means the generated code conflicts with our type.
Unfortunately this affects codegen as well, although this is a part of the public API which is very unlikely to affect hand-written code.
Generated code changes in next commit.
The usage of ICustomDiagnosticMessage here is non-essential - ToDiagnosticString
doesn't actually get called by ToString() in this case, due to JsonFormatter code. It was
intended to make it clearer that it *did* have a custom format... but then arguably I should
do the same for Value, Struct, Any etc.
Moving some of the code out of JsonFormatter and into Duration/Timestamp/FieldMask likewise
feels somewhat nice, somewhat nasty... basically there are JSON-specific bits of formatting, but
also domain-specific bits of computation. <sigh>
Thoughts welcome.
- Tighten up on Infinity/NaN handling in terms of whitespace handling (and test casing)
- Validate that values are genuinely integers when they've been parsed from a JSON number (ignoring the fact that 1.0000000000000000001 == 1 as a double...)
- Allow exponents and decimal points in string representations
The conformance tests now use types which are part of src/google/protobuf, so we need to include src in the proto path.
The notes around "fix-ups" have been out of date for some time now.
Jon Skeet
Jos Hickson
Jisi Liu
alien
avgweb
Jan Tattermusch