This is a proof of concept that we can experiment with before migrating all of our Kokoro tests to GHA. In addition to the migration, this builds out infrastructure for safe handling of both external and internal contributions. Two of the existing GHA workflows have also been migrated to this system to unify how we handle testing.
To test the new workflow introduced here, you can open PRs to the `gha` branch. This feature branch acts as a staging area for GHA. PRs opened up from this repo will automatically have all tests run on each commit. We will also run them all as post-submits, and continuously on a daily schedule. PRs opened from forked repos will need per-commit approval for each test run, which can be given by adding the `safe for tests` label.
Examples (failures are intentional to show that the PR code is being tested):
- Internal PR: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/11679
- Fork PR (approved): https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/11685
- Fork PR (rejected): https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/11683
- External PR: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/11695Closes#11702
This uses https://github.com/protocolbuffers/rules_ruby to fully Bazelify our ruby runtime code. The Rakefile is left in place for now and is still used by our aarch64 tests. With the current implementation ruby behaves similarly to our python wrapper, which selects whatever version is installed in the system. Future enhancements will allow for more hermetic builds via Bazel flags to pin a specific version
Closes#10525
* Added staleness test for ruby-upb.{c,h} and updated.
* Removed file comment markers, too much trouble for too little benefit.
* Ran clang-format.
* Updated ruby-upb.{c,h}.
* Added missing table code to amalgamation.
* Updated to latest upb, patch no longer needed.
* Reverted changes to third_party sub-modules.
* Added missing unicode file.
* Removed conformance failures for Ruby.
* Bazelfying conformance tests
Adding infrastructure to "Bazelify" languages other than Java and C++
* Delete benchmarks for languages supported by other repositories
* Bazelfying benchmark tests
* Bazelfying python
Use upb's system python rule instead of branching tensorflow
* Bazelfying Ruby
* Bazelfying C#
* Bazelfying Objective-c
* Bazelfying Kokoro mac builds
* Bazelfying Kokoro linux builds
* Deleting all deprecated files from autotools cleanup
This boils down to Makefile.am and tests.sh and all of their remaining references
* Cleanup after PR reorganizing
- Enable 32 bit tests
- Move conformance tests back
- Use select statements to select alternate runtimes
- Add internal prefixes to proto library macros
* Updating READMEs to use bazel instead of autotools.
* Bazelfying Kokoro release builds
* First round of review fixes
* Second round of review fixes
* Third round of review fixes
* Filtering out conformance tests from Bazel on Windows (b/241484899)
* Add version metadata that was previously scraped from configure.ac
* fixing typo from previous fix
* Adding ruby version tests
* Bumping pinned upb version, and adding tests to python CI
This avoids conflicting names in a couple of cases.
1. Within google, we want to sync files but not name them BUILD (since the structure doesn't match).
2. On case-insensitive filesystems, `build` may be used for a build directory. Naming `BUILD.bazel` avoids potentioal conflicts.
This change adds `rules_pkg`-based targets that will produce source distribution archives, similar to `make dist`.
These rules produce nearly the same outputs as `make dist`. However, there are some differences and caveats:
1. The outputs do not contain vendored googletest sources.
2. You have to run `autogen.sh` before `blaze build pkg:all`. This produces several autotools-related files directly into the source tree.
3. The output .zip files do not have a directory prefix like `protobuf-3.20.1-rc-1` (this will be addressed after [Substitute package variables in `pkg_zip#package_dir`. bazelbuild/rules_pkg#577](https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_pkg/pull/577); the tar files do have this prefix, though.)
4. One file is missing from the archives, which is produced during the `make` build: benchmarks/gogo/cpp_no_group/cpp_benchmark.cc
5. In several places, I have explicitly excluded some files that are not in the autotools distribution outputs. I think most of those files should probably be included, but for now, I'm aiming for parity with `make dist`. These are marked with comments, so it should be easy to clean them up later.
Jason Lunn
Mike Kruskal
deannagarcia
Joshua Haberman
Mike Kruskal
David L. Jones