Allows two messages to be compared directly for equality without
generating an equals method for every generated message.
(Ports CL58125010)
Change-Id: I92ab5088539d1fd722fee7b5e28a8c825926c3b6
Instead of publishing its class I chose to encapsulate the troublesome
references in equals()/hashCode() in the generated code into superclass
methods in ExtendableMessageNano.
Changed a couple of java packages in the test suite to catch this issue
easier in the future.
Change-Id: I43f88411f63bb6f3ffc8d63361f2f77bebf6220a
The current implementation of getExtension deserialises the field from bytes
and returns a new object every time. This means that changes to those objects
are reflected when the messages is serialised unless setExtension is called. It
also means that every call to getExtension and setExtension is expensive.
This change introduces a FieldData class that contains everything that's known
about the field at the time. This can be all the tag/byte[] pairs associated
with a given field or an Extension and a value object. This is so that two
messages with a repeated extension can be compared even if the extension
has been deserialised in one of them but not the other.
This change also adds FieldArray class based on SparseArray from the Android
compatibility library. This is used in ExtendableMessageNano to make lookup
of FieldDatas by their field number faster.
Implications:
* calling getExtension multiple times deserialises the field only once and
returns the same object.
* calling setExtension doesn't cause the object to be serialised immediately,
that only happens when the container message is serialised.
* getExtension is no longer a read-only thread-safe operation. README.txt has
been updated to relfect that.
* comparison using equals and hashCode continues to work.
Bug: 10863158
Change-Id: I81c7cb0c73cc0611a1f7c1eabf5eed259738e8bc
If ExtendableMessageNano doesn't have any unknown fields, trying to
clear an extension by setting it to null would throw an NPE.
Change-Id: I6abcdfcc0193de44f97b21dd6cc2f40604938a1a
This CL adds the "parcelable_messages" option. When enabled, all
generated message classes will conform to the Android Parcelable
contract. This is achieved by introducing a new parent class for
generated classes which implements the required functionality.
Since the store_unknown_fields option also makes use of a superclass,
ExtendableMessageNano, we have two versions of the new Parcelable
superclass: one extending MessageNano, and one extending
ExtendableMessageNano. These classes are otherwise identical.
As these classes depend on Android framework jars, they are not
included in the host .jar build of the nanoproto library.
Finally, add a test suite for running tests of Android-specific
functionality, as this cannot be done on a desktop JVM.
Change-Id: Icc2a257f03317e947f7078dbb9857c3286857497
Nano proto compiler normally throws an error if any service is
defined. If --ignore-services=true is set, no error is thrown and the
service is simply skipped.
Change-Id: Id82583555085cc55550d03a485d3f0189885240b
This avoids a race-condition when cachedSize is momentarily set to 0
for non-empty messages if multiple threads call getSerializedSize
(e.g. during serialization).
This is a retry of https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/88570/.
getSerializedSize() has been kept non-final so that messages generated
with a previous version of the compiler will not break.
Change-Id: I8d8154a10938cde579ae19c55eae55b1e70e0bda
This avoids a race-condition when cachedSize is momentarily set to 0
for non-empty messages if multiple threads call getSerializedSize
(e.g. during serialization).
Change-Id: I15a8ded92edbf41bf1c8d787960c5bbbc8a323c5
Invalid values from the wire are silently ignored.
Unlike full/lite, the invalid values are not stored into the
unknown fields, because there's no way to get them out from
Nano's unknown fields without a matching Extension.
Edited README and slightly moved it towards a standalone
section for Nano, independent of the Micro section.
Change-Id: I2c1eb07f4d6d8f3aea242b8ddd95b9c966f3f177
Special values for float and double make it inaccurate to test the equality with ==.
The main Java library uses the standard Object.equals() implementation for all fields,
which for floating point fields means Float.equals() or Double.equals(). They define
equality as bitwise equality, with all NaN representations normalized to the same bit
sequence (and therefore equal to each other). This test checks that the nano
implementation complies with Object.equals(), so NaN == NaN and +0.0 != -0.0.
Change-Id: I97bb4a3687223d8a212c70cd736436b9dd80c1d7