Overview of changes:
- A new C#-specific command-line option, legacy_enum_values to revert to the old behavior
- When legacy_enum_values isn't specified, we strip the enum name as a prefix, and PascalCase the value name
- A new attribute within the C# code so that we can always tell the original in-proto name
Regenerating the C# code with legacy_enum_values leads to code which still compiles and works - but
there's more still to do.
I've moved both protoc.exe and the proto files out of Google.Protobuf.
The .proto files aren't a slam-dunk, but it feels like they belong with protoc as you'd *use* them with protoc.
It's not clear to me whether we really need both an x86 and x64 version of protoc.exe, as x86 would work on 64-bit Windows anyway. Discuss :)
This makes no externally visible behavioral changes. Internally and non-behaviorally:
- We use a field (compiler-generated) to store the JsonName to avoid recomputing it repeatedly
- The documentation for JsonName is updated to reflect the meaning better
- Readonly autoprops and expression-bodied properties used where possible
This detects:
- An end-group tag with the wrong field number (doesn't match the start-group field)
- An end-group tag with no preceding start-group tag
Fixes issue #688.
This is a start to fixing issue #1212. It won't help for test protos,
conformance etc, but it will definitely be better than nothing, and
would have highlighted a change in descriptor.proto which broken C#
earlier.
Recently, descriptor.proto gained a GeneratedCodeInfo message, which means the generated code conflicts with our type.
Unfortunately this affects codegen as well, although this is a part of the public API which is very unlikely to affect hand-written code.
Generated code changes in next commit.
The usage of ICustomDiagnosticMessage here is non-essential - ToDiagnosticString
doesn't actually get called by ToString() in this case, due to JsonFormatter code. It was
intended to make it clearer that it *did* have a custom format... but then arguably I should
do the same for Value, Struct, Any etc.
Moving some of the code out of JsonFormatter and into Duration/Timestamp/FieldMask likewise
feels somewhat nice, somewhat nasty... basically there are JSON-specific bits of formatting, but
also domain-specific bits of computation. <sigh>
Thoughts welcome.
- Tighten up on Infinity/NaN handling in terms of whitespace handling (and test casing)
- Validate that values are genuinely integers when they've been parsed from a JSON number (ignoring the fact that 1.0000000000000000001 == 1 as a double...)
- Allow exponents and decimal points in string representations
The conformance tests now use types which are part of src/google/protobuf, so we need to include src in the proto path.
The notes around "fix-ups" have been out of date for some time now.
Jon Skeet
alien
avgweb
Jan Tattermusch
Jan Tattermusch
Dongjoon Hyun