- ProxiedInMapValue is defined in maps.rs, and no longer in the runtime files {upb, cpp}.rs.
- ProxiedInMapValue's methods accept and return Proxied types.
- InnerMapMut no longer has any generic type parameters.
- Through this refactoring the Map type is no longer a ZST. Creating a new map is now as simple as `Map::new()`.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 597765165
This will enable us to get the correct crate names for Rust gencode. The actual
reading of the mapping file in protoc happens in the followup.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 597509582
When we implement Deref for RepeatedMut we cast it to a RepeatedView. The safety comments state that this is sound because both RepeatdView and RepeatedMut are repr(transparent) over InnerRepeatedMut. However, this has no longer been true after a recent change. RepeatedView and RepeatedMut had different layouts.
This change fixes the soundness issue by type casting the RawRepeatedField of a RepeatedMut to a RepeatedView. This is sound because RepeatedReview is repr(transparent) over RawRepeatedField.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 597488476
If this took a &self there were holes in thread and memory safety, because it's allowed to get multiple &MsgMuts (but only &mut MsgMuts).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 596991263
This change is a pure refactoring and simplification of the code. We replace all MapsWith<TYPE>KeyOps traits through a single generic ProxiedInMapValue<K> trait. Through connecting the runtime maps implementation with Proxied the code gets a lot simpler e.g. we can use View<T> instead of hardcoding the concrete type behind it.
I also expect this change to be beneficial for the gencode. In a subsequent CL we'll implement message values for maps. After this change we'll only have to implement a single trait, while before we had to implement num(key types) many traits.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 596562909
This check enforces that each C++ build target has the correct dependencies for
all headers that it includes. We have many targets that were not correct with
respect to this check, so I fixed them up.
I also cleaned up the C++ targets related to the well-known types. I created a
cc_proto_library() target for each one and removed the :wkt_cc_protos target,
since this was necessary to satisfy the layering check. I deleted the
//src/google/protobuf:protobuf_nowkt target and deprecated :protobuf_nowkt,
because the distinction between the :protobuf and :protobuf_nowkt targets was
not really correct. Neither one exposed the headers for the well-known types in
a way that was valid with respect to the layering check, and the idea of
bundling all the well-known types together is not idiomatic in Bazel anyway.
This is a breaking change, because the //:protobuf target no longer bundles the
well-known types. From now on they should be accessed through the new
//:*_cc_proto aliases in our top-level package.
I renamed the :port_def target to :port, which simplifies things a bit by
matching our internal name.
The original motivation for this change was that to move utf8_range onto our CI
infrastructure, we needed to make its dependency rules_fuzzing compatible with
Bazel 6. The rules_fuzzing project builds with the layering check, and I found
that the process of upgrading it to Bazel 6 made it take a dependency on
protobuf, which caused it to break due to layering violations. I was able to
work around this, but it would still be nice to comply with the layering check
so that we don't have to worry about this kind of thing in the future.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 595516736
For the cpp runtime, call the `Message::CopyFrom` method.
For the upb runtime, expose the message `MiniTable` and call `upb_Message_DeepCopy`.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 595166276
To satisfy the layering check, we need to depend on :gtest for the headers, in
addition to :gtest_main which provides the main() function.
There are a bunch of formatting changes as a side effect of this, but they
should be harmless.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 594318263
Now that Bazel 7.0 has been released, it's time to remove this tech debt.
This has been a no-op since Bazel 5.0, I've been waiting to remove the code for
two years, it's time.
Part of https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/14127.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 591940644
We augment the TYPE_STRING block inside message.cc:GetterForViewOrMut so that we properly return a Mut for strings when it comes to submessages.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 589944498
- Rename most usage of `'a` to `'msg`
- Remove a no-op unused lifetime param for `remove` in maps
- Elide lifetimes recommended by clippy
PiperOrigin-RevId: 589878364
This significantly simplifies the internals of PrimitiveMut,
and removes the need to refactor BytesMut and ProtoStrMut
to have the same runtime branching.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 589292565
This change implements maps with keys and values of type string e.g. Map<ProtoStr, i32> and Map<ProtoStr, ProtoStr>.
Implementing the Map type for ProtoStr has been different from scalar types because ProtoStr is an unsized type i.e. its size is not known at compile time. The existing Map implementation assumed sized types in many places. To make unsized types fit into the existing code architecture I have added an associated type 'Value' to the MapWith*KeyOps traits. The associated type needs to be sized and is the type returned by the Map::get(self, key) method e.g. for aProtoStr, the `type Value = &ProtoStr`.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 588783751
accessors_test.rs is getting a bit unwieldy, approaching 1K LOC. This CL breaks out the repeated tests into their own file (accessors_repeated_test.rs), as we expect the tests here to grow. This follows the precedent of `accessors_map_test.rs`.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 588554476
Before this CL, we weren't generating view accessors for messages with depth > 1.
We weren't getting to message::GetterForViewOrMut because we were detecting FieldDescriptor::TYPE_MESSAGE and bailing out.
That check has now been expunged, and we now properly emit the right view, even for messages embedded within messages.
Added tests for:
- another level of submsg access depth
- accessing a message declared outside of the current message (that is, not a direct nested message within the same message)
- accessing the accessor of the accessor of the accessor of a recursively defined message
PiperOrigin-RevId: 588460599
Marcel Hlopko
Kevin King
Alyssa Haroldsen
Jakob Buchgraber
Protobuf Team Bot
Bastien Jacot-Guillarmod
Adam Cozzette
Hong Shin
John Cater
Adrian Sadłocha