* external/com_google_protobuf/src/google/protobuf/stubs/strutil.cc:1122:9: runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'google::protobuf::int64' (aka 'long'); cast to an unsigned type to negate this value to itself
* Bad external/com_google_protobuf/src/google/protobuf/text_format.cc:1320:14: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 1, which is declared to never be null
/usr/include/string.h:62:62: note: nonnull attribute specified here
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
This actually has always been using the first branch because
`__cpluscplus` is not a real definition (contrast with the real spelling
of `__cplusplus`).
* add implicit time conversion
* add duration
* add init test
* more tests
* add type check and alternative c type check
* add rational and bigdecimal
* use rb_obj_is_kind_of
* use native time check
* chain implicit conversions
* remove unused variable
We ran into problems with precompiled protoc binaries not working on
some systems because of the dependence on a dynamically linked
libatomic. However, I found that linking against libatomic is not
actually necessary in our protoc build environment. Inside configure.ac
there's a test which figures out if we need to pass -latomic, and it
does this by attempting to build a test binary. That binary was failing
to build, but it turns out this was because we need to pass -std=c++11,
not -latomic.
This fixes#5875.
We need to mark messages as final soon, but before we do that we need to
provide a temporary opt-out mechanism to accommodate existing code that
inherits from generated messages. For 3.7.1 let's stop marking messages
final but in 3.8 we can reintroduce "final" with an opt-out option.
The bazel-bin/ and bazel-genfiles/ directories are going to be merged
soon. That change was causing some test failures on Windows, and I
believe it is because the logic for locating test data files was getting
confused and mistakenly looking for them under bazel-bin/. This commit
updates that logic to look for a more specific file (descriptor.cc)
which does not appear under any Bazel-related directories.
It sounds like the more official solution is to use the Bazel runfiles
library (i.e. //tools/cpp/runfiles). However, I decided not to do that
because we currently still support multiple build systems, and if we
used a separate solution for Bazel then I suspect we would need even
more #ifdefs in the code to handle the different systems.
Hao Nguyen
Hao Nguyen
yejianwu
Ankit Singh
Phillipp Schoppmann
Harvey Tuch
Paul Yang
Adam Cozzette
Bo Yang
Ben Boeckel
Joe Bolinger
Pavel Perestoronin
Benjamin Peterson
myd7349
Daniel Kurka
Mickaël Schoentgen