Extend our Java OSGi library to have a version that works for Kotlin. Add a `protobuf_versioned_kt_jvm_library` that creates a bundle with the OSGi manifest and call that instead of `kt_jvm_library` for all our kotlin maven release targets.
Closes#18812
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/18812 from deannagarcia:kotlinOSGi 81bab06f61
PiperOrigin-RevId: 686220820
The default name for the rules_jvm_external.maven rule is "maven". When not set, it defaults to "maven". For root modules also using rules_jvm_external, the name clash causes a warning:
```
DEBUG: $TMP/external/rules_jvm_external~/private/extensions/maven.bzl:154:14:
The maven repository 'maven' is used in two different bazel modules,
originally in '<my_workspace>' and now in 'protobuf'
```
Summarizing @shs96c in [1]:
> The common maven repo name allows rulesets to contribute to the user's JARs.
> However, this implies that maven is for the end user, not for transitive
> dependencies. If a ruleset needs private dependencies, it should use a custom
> namespace rather than the maven namespace.
Since protobuf is not contributing to user's JARs, we'll use a custom namespace. There's precedent for using a custom namespace for library modules:
- rules_jvm_external uses `rules_jvm_external_deps` instead of `maven`.
- rules_kotlin uses `kotlin_rules_maven` instead of `maven`.
[1]: https://github.com/bazel-contrib/rules_jvm_external/issues/916#issuecomment-1645527584Fixes#16839.
Closes#18641
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/18641 from jschaf:joe/protobuf-maven bd2c62f311
PiperOrigin-RevId: 684625084
Create WORKSPACE.bzlmod. Before building with Bzlmod resulted in use of full WORKSPACE.
Some repos are still there, but the file should eventually be empty.
Add dep to rules_kotlin 1.9.0. This was the first version available on BCR. It pushed upgrade of
rules_jvm_external to 6.0 and rules_java to 6.5.2 (keep 6.0.0 on Bazel 6.3.0).
Add missing maven and other deps to MODULE.bazel
CI changes:
Disable Bazel 6.4.0 with bzlmod. rules_jvm_external 6.0 use use_repo_rule, which is not supported by Bazel 6.
Add C++ build "Bazel7 with Bzlmod" enabled.
Add Java builds with "Bazel 7 with/without Bzlmod".
Fixes: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/17176
PiperOrigin-RevId: 652773197
Instead of _builder.getFoo() and _builder.setFoo(value), the generated code now uses _builder.foo and _builder.foo = value. When compiling against the Java Proto API, this makes no difference, since the Kotlin compiler treats Java methods getFoo/setFoo as defining a Kotlin property foo. But if a compatible proto API is implemented in Kotlin then there is no such equivalence. Such an implementation would have to define either both forms or just the one that the DSL uses. For a Kotlin API it is more natural to use properties.
Similarly, the generated Java methods getFoosList(), getFoosCount(), getFoosMap(), and getEnumValue() are accessed via property names (foosList, foosCount, foosMap, enumValue).
(This is the second application of this change. The first had to be rolled back because it didn't handle conflict-resolution names correctly.)
PiperOrigin-RevId: 629807104
Instead of `_builder.getFoo()` and `_builder.setFoo(value)`, the generated code now uses `_builder.foo` and `_builder.foo = value`. When compiling against the Java Proto API, this makes no difference, since the Kotlin compiler treats Java methods `getFoo`/`setFoo` as defining a Kotlin property `foo`. But if a compatible proto API is implemented in Kotlin then there is no such equivalence. Such an implementation would have to define either both forms or just the one that the DSL uses. For a Kotlin API it is more natural to use properties.
Similarly, the generated Java methods `getFoosList()`, `getFoosCount()`, `getFoosMap()`, and `getEnumValue()` are accessed via property names (`foosList`, `foosCount`, `foosMap`, `enumValue`).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 629220383
The only public target here is the edition defaults helper macro, which can be used by external runtimes and plugins. None of this code is C++-specific though, and should be organized higher up. Appropriate aliases are also placed at the top level for public targets
PiperOrigin-RevId: 625392504
They are not needed after the rules are move into protobuf repo.
Except for the reference to toolchain type, which is currently in rules_proto and can be moved after the implementation is moved into protobuf repo.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 622176865
GeneratedMessage, not GeneratedMessageV3.
Please rerun protoc on your .proto files to regenerate the binding code.
https://protobuf.dev/news/2023-12-05/https://protobuf.dev/support/cross-version-runtime-guarantee/
To fix source compatibility with surrounding code make these replacements:
GeneratedMessageV3 --> GeneratedMessage
SingleFieldBuilderV3 --> SingleFieldBuilder
RepeatedFieldBuilderV3 --> RepeatedFieldBuilder
PiperOrigin-RevId: 597642289
This change moves almost everything in the `upb/` directory up one level, so
that for example `upb/upb/generated_code_support.h` becomes just
`upb/generated_code_support.h`. The only exceptions I made to this were that I
left `upb/cmake` and `upb/BUILD` where they are, mostly because that avoids
conflict with other files and the current locations seem reasonable for now.
The `python/` directory is a little bit of a challenge because we had to merge
the existing directory there with `upb/python/`. I made `upb/python/BUILD` into
the BUILD file for the merged directory, and it effectively loads the contents
of the other BUILD file via `python/build_targets.bzl`, but I plan to clean
this up soon.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 568651768