The identifiers `true`, `false`, and `null` are effectively reserved words in Java, although for some reason they are listed separately from the "keywords" in the Java Language Specification.
This doesn't matter for regular fields, because a proto field called `true` will be accessed with `getTrue` and `setTrue`. But for extensions, the generated Java code will have a public static field whose name is the same as the name of the extension field, with `_` appended if the name is a reserved word. Previously there was no `_` for `true` etc, so the generated code would not compile.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 631599695
upb users currently need to manually fetch a oneof field in order to clear it.
In this CL, we add a convenience method to do that in one fell swoop.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 631454136
The idea here is to set the existing config "config_msvc" not only
when "msvc-cl" is specified but also when "clang-cl" is specified.
Keep in mind that clang-cl support in protobuf remains to be only
best-effort and untested for now.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 631195504
(Second attempt. The first attempt missed ListValue)
The “in” operator will be consistent with HasField but a little different with Proto Plus.
The detail behavior of “in” operator in Nextgen
* For WKT Struct (to be consist with old Struct behavior):
-Raise TypeError if not pass a string
-Check if the key is in the struct.fields
* For WKT ListValue (to be consist with old behavior):
-Check if the key is in the list_value.values
* For other messages:
-Raise ValueError if not pass a string
-Raise ValueError if the string is not a field
-For Oneof: Check any field under the oneof is set
-For has-presence field: check if set
-For non-has-presence field (include repeated fields): raise ValueError
PiperOrigin-RevId: 631143378
We modify set_<repeated_field> to accept the IntoProxied type as the value and move the value (avoid copying) whenever possible.
For UPB:
- We fuse the arena of Repeated<T> with the parent message arena.
- We use upb_Message_SetBaseField to set the upb_Array contained in the Repeated<T>.
For C++:
- We generate an additional setter thunk that moves the value.
- The move assignment operator of RepeatedField/RepeatedPtrField is specialized. In order to adhere to the layering check we need to add '#include' statements for all .proto imports to the generated thunks.pb.cc.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 631010333
This is equivalent to C++'s `_IsValid` functions. Since proto3 enums are open,
`is_known` seems to be a better name than the misleading `is_valid`.
C++-specific Protocol Buffers documentation already uses "known fields" and
"unknown enum values" expressions.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 630344180
I also considered using Collections.emptyNavigableMap(), which I thought might
use a specialized allocation free empty iterator, but it allocates, and its
clone() method isn't nicely exposed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 630234849
Previously, we would allocate a boxed Integer when accessing repeated enums, because we used ArrayList<Integer>, which must box the int.
Use IntArrayList and the primitive "int getInt()" method instead.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 630229119
Instead of checking the resolved features, we should really be checking the has_presence helper. Repeated fields, oneofs, and extensions can trigger these conditions when they inherit IMPLICIT, even though it's ignored.
Closes#16664
PiperOrigin-RevId: 630206208
Map fields should remain length-prefixed for now, even if DELIMITED is inherited. Field presence will remain unchanged, but unit-tests are added to make sure proto2/proto3 behaviors stay consistent.
Closes#16549
PiperOrigin-RevId: 630191163
This can cause ODR violations in downstream users who link against both the bootstrapped proto and transitive C++ gencode of java_features.proto. Once protoc is split up, we can turn the bootstrapped proto into a real cc_proto_library target and avoid this problem altogether.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 630099889
Instead of _builder.getFoo() and _builder.setFoo(value), the generated code now uses _builder.foo and _builder.foo = value. When compiling against the Java Proto API, this makes no difference, since the Kotlin compiler treats Java methods getFoo/setFoo as defining a Kotlin property foo. But if a compatible proto API is implemented in Kotlin then there is no such equivalence. Such an implementation would have to define either both forms or just the one that the DSL uses. For a Kotlin API it is more natural to use properties.
Similarly, the generated Java methods getFoosList(), getFoosCount(), getFoosMap(), and getEnumValue() are accessed via property names (foosList, foosCount, foosMap, enumValue).
(This is the second application of this change. The first had to be rolled back because it didn't handle conflict-resolution names correctly.)
PiperOrigin-RevId: 629807104
This will reduce unnecessary resource consumption by cancelling running workflows when new commits are pushed to a PR or workflow dispatch. It does not cancel pushes to main or branches.
Closes#16601
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/16601 from sethvargo:sethvargo/actions-concurrency 82fd070dba
PiperOrigin-RevId: 629805311
upb users currently need to manually fetch a oneof field in order to clear it.
In this CL, we add a convenience method to do that in one fell swoop.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 629782904
Eric Salo
Protobuf Team Bot
Éamonn McManus
Protobuf Team Bot
Sandy Zhang
Hong Shin
Mark Hansen
Jie Luo
Yohei Yukawa
Jakob Buchgraber
Bastien Jacot-Guillarmod
Thomas Van Lenten
Adrian Sadłocha
Mike Kruskal
Seth Vargo
Kyle Montemayor