I've moved both protoc.exe and the proto files out of Google.Protobuf.
The .proto files aren't a slam-dunk, but it feels like they belong with protoc as you'd *use* them with protoc.
It's not clear to me whether we really need both an x86 and x64 version of protoc.exe, as x86 would work on 64-bit Windows anyway. Discuss :)
This makes no externally visible behavioral changes. Internally and non-behaviorally:
- We use a field (compiler-generated) to store the JsonName to avoid recomputing it repeatedly
- The documentation for JsonName is updated to reflect the meaning better
- Readonly autoprops and expression-bodied properties used where possible
This detects:
- An end-group tag with the wrong field number (doesn't match the start-group field)
- An end-group tag with no preceding start-group tag
Fixes issue #688.
This is a start to fixing issue #1212. It won't help for test protos,
conformance etc, but it will definitely be better than nothing, and
would have highlighted a change in descriptor.proto which broken C#
earlier.
Recently, descriptor.proto gained a GeneratedCodeInfo message, which means the generated code conflicts with our type.
Unfortunately this affects codegen as well, although this is a part of the public API which is very unlikely to affect hand-written code.
Generated code changes in next commit.
The usage of ICustomDiagnosticMessage here is non-essential - ToDiagnosticString
doesn't actually get called by ToString() in this case, due to JsonFormatter code. It was
intended to make it clearer that it *did* have a custom format... but then arguably I should
do the same for Value, Struct, Any etc.
Moving some of the code out of JsonFormatter and into Duration/Timestamp/FieldMask likewise
feels somewhat nice, somewhat nasty... basically there are JSON-specific bits of formatting, but
also domain-specific bits of computation. <sigh>
Thoughts welcome.
- Tighten up on Infinity/NaN handling in terms of whitespace handling (and test casing)
- Validate that values are genuinely integers when they've been parsed from a JSON number (ignoring the fact that 1.0000000000000000001 == 1 as a double...)
- Allow exponents and decimal points in string representations
The conformance tests now use types which are part of src/google/protobuf, so we need to include src in the proto path.
The notes around "fix-ups" have been out of date for some time now.
This addresses issue #1008, by creating a JsonFormatter which is private and only different
to JsonFormatter.Default in terms of reference equality.
Other plausible designs:
- The same, but expose the diagnostic-only formatter
- Add something to settings to say "I don't have a type registry at all"
- Change the behaviour of JsonFormatter.Default (bad idea IMO, as we really *don't* want the result of this used as regular JSON to be parsed)
Note that just trying to find a separate fix to issue #933 and using that to override Any.ToString() differently wouldn't work for messages that *contain* an Any.
Generated code changes follow in the next commit.
This required a rework of the tokenizer to allow for a "replaying" tokenizer, basically in case the @type value comes after the data itself. This rework is nice in some ways (all the pushback and object depth logic in one place) but is a little fragile in terms of token push-back when using the replay tokenizer. It'll be fine for the scenario we need it for, but we should be careful...
Jon Skeet
alien
avgweb
Jan Tattermusch
Jan Tattermusch
Dongjoon Hyun