Most of our code includes a space after the cast, e.g. `(int) x`
instead of `(int)x`. This .editorconfig change means that will be
the default formatting when it's performed by the editor.
We already have the TypeRegistry abstraction for JSON parsing, so it lends itself well to this.
Note that this is much more useful than it would have been before C# gained pattern matching support: it's easy to imagine a switch statement/expression using pattern matching with the result of this, with cases for a set of known message types, for example.
This avoids conflicting names in a couple of cases.
1. Within google, we want to sync files but not name them BUILD (since the structure doesn't match).
2. On case-insensitive filesystems, `build` may be used for a build directory. Naming `BUILD.bazel` avoids potentioal conflicts.
This change adds `rules_pkg`-based targets that will produce source distribution archives, similar to `make dist`.
These rules produce nearly the same outputs as `make dist`. However, there are some differences and caveats:
1. The outputs do not contain vendored googletest sources.
2. You have to run `autogen.sh` before `blaze build pkg:all`. This produces several autotools-related files directly into the source tree.
3. The output .zip files do not have a directory prefix like `protobuf-3.20.1-rc-1` (this will be addressed after [Substitute package variables in `pkg_zip#package_dir`. bazelbuild/rules_pkg#577](https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_pkg/pull/577); the tar files do have this prefix, though.)
4. One file is missing from the archives, which is produced during the `make` build: benchmarks/gogo/cpp_no_group/cpp_benchmark.cc
5. In several places, I have explicitly excluded some files that are not in the autotools distribution outputs. I think most of those files should probably be included, but for now, I'm aiming for parity with `make dist`. These are marked with comments, so it should be easy to clean them up later.
* Fix NPE during encoding and add regression test for issue 9507.
(cherry picked from commit 58e320a732)
* Implement `respond_to?` in RubyMessage (#9677)
All synthetic methods implemented by `method_missing` are now supported by `respond_to?`.
Fixes issue #9202.
* Fix null pointer exceptions exposed by new regression tests.
* Fix clear_ on oneofs so that it is safe to call repeatedly and so that respond_to? does not depend on whether the oneof is currently cleared.
* Code cleanup: reenable more tests on JRuby.
* Align JRuby behavior with CRuby by throwing a RuntimeError when attempting to assign to a oneof.
(cherry picked from commit 8e7f936696)
* Update protobuf version
* Merge pull request #9727 from mlocati/build-packaged-php-extension
Fix building packaged PHP extension
(cherry picked from commit 7f9901c5f6)
* Update protobuf version
* Update changelogs for 3.20.1-rc1
Co-authored-by: Jason Lunn <jason.lunn@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorg Brown <jorg.brown@gmail.com>
This doesn't test *all* possibilities (e.g. the field being a
wrapper, or a message field, etc) - but I'm fairly confident that I
found all the places referring to the case.
When following the instructions directly (for developing on Windows) we should end up with a generator that's easy to run for csharp/generate_protos.sh, and we shouldn't end up trying to stage the build output.
theodorerose
Jon Skeet
Protobuf Team Bot
Erik Mavrinac
Jorg Brown
Sandy Zhang
David L. Jones
Jan Tattermusch
Vassil Kovatchev
Deanna Garcia
Protobuf Team
Joshua Haberman
cui fliter
noahdietz
mkruskal-google
Mike Kruskal
Jensaarai
Darly Paredes
James Newton-King
Adam Cozzette
Junrou Nishida
ObsidianMinor