I wasn't able to get the clear() method to inline into the
constructor when optimizations are on in proguard. As a result,
every message has an extra superfluous kept method assuming the
app never uses clear() directly.
There are a couple of instances where setting this option false is
necessary in order to get code dexing successfully without hitting
the method limit, e.g. https://goto.google.com/tltzq
In this example, I tried turning on the method/inlining/unique and
method/inlining/short optimizations before resorting to adding the
generate_clear option, but the method count did not decrease. The
clear() methods were contributing over a thousand extra methods.
Change-Id: If6a9651d6a59cdf70b1040d8248779710ac73105
@IntDef is a support library annotation which allows build tools to
determine the valid set of values for a given integer field when that
field is intended to be restricted like an enum. This avoids the
overhead of enums while still allowing for compile-time type checking
in most circumstances.
Change-Id: Iee02e0b49a8e069f6456572f538e0a0d301fdfd5
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/67890/ removed field
initialization from the ctor, making it just call clear() instead.
When I added the generate_clear option back (as part of the reftypes
compat mode) in https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/109530/,
I forgot to ensure that what clear() used to do was inlined in the
constructor.
This change fixes NPEs that are happening for users of
reftypes_compat_mode who rely on unset repeated fields being empty
arrays rather than null.
Change-Id: Idb58746c60f4a4054b7ebb5c3b0e76b16ff88184
Previously, extensions with field numbers greater than 268435455 would
result in a compile time error in generated code that looks something
like this:
Foo.java:3178: error: integer number too large: 3346754610
3346754610);
This is because we were trying to represent the tag number (an
unsigned int) using a java int constant, but java int constants are
signed, and can't exceed Integer.MAX_VALUE.
Fixed by declaring it as a long instead, and casting it down to an
int in the implementation. This is safe, because the tag value always
fits in 32 bis.
Change-Id: If2017bacb4e20af667eaeaf9b65ddc2c30a7709f
The file `SEBS` is a build file for a toy build system I was writing in my spare time six years ago, back when I maintained protobufs. Arguably it was never appropriate for me to have placed this file in the protobuf tree, but it was convenient at the time and didn't seem to hurt anything. It clearly doesn't belong here now, though.
The later is not supported by some versions of MSVC and the former is
more accurate for the use case.
Change-Id: I7096226b1ebfef8340d288bbaf2788540aa3e97f
* Rosy hack doesn't apply (that test should be removed
for the open-source release).
* Added our own copy of parameterized.py (the open-source
version of Google Apputils doesn't contain it).
* The C++ Descriptor object didn't implement extension_ranges.
* Had to implement a hack around returning EncodeError, to
work around the module-loading behavior of the test runner.