parent
bf1cc9217a
commit
0f370b468b
3 changed files with 121 additions and 121 deletions
@ -1,119 +1,119 @@ |
||||
syntax = "proto3"; |
||||
|
||||
// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect. |
||||
// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix. |
||||
|
||||
// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified |
||||
option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos"; |
||||
|
||||
package unittest_issues; |
||||
option optimize_for = SPEED; |
||||
|
||||
// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references |
||||
// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C. |
||||
message Issue307 { |
||||
message NestedOnce { |
||||
message NestedTwice { |
||||
} |
||||
} |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13 |
||||
// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309 |
||||
|
||||
// message A { |
||||
// optional int32 _A = 1; |
||||
// } |
||||
|
||||
// message B { |
||||
// optional int32 B_ = 1; |
||||
// } |
||||
|
||||
//message AB { |
||||
// optional int32 a_b = 1; |
||||
//} |
||||
|
||||
// Similar issue with numeric names |
||||
// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction. |
||||
// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308 |
||||
// message NumberField { |
||||
// optional int32 _01 = 1; |
||||
// } |
||||
|
||||
// issue 19 - negative enum values |
||||
|
||||
enum NegativeEnum { |
||||
NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0; |
||||
FiveBelow = -5; |
||||
MinusOne = -1; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
message NegativeEnumMessage { |
||||
NegativeEnum value = 1; |
||||
repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false]; |
||||
repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true]; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21 |
||||
// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete] |
||||
|
||||
message DeprecatedChild { |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
enum DeprecatedEnum { |
||||
DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0; |
||||
one = 1; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
message DeprecatedFieldsMessage { |
||||
int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
|
||||
DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
|
||||
DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45 |
||||
message ItemField { |
||||
int32 item = 1; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
message ReservedNames { |
||||
// Force a nested type called Types |
||||
message SomeNestedType { |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
int32 types = 1; |
||||
int32 descriptor = 2; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
message TestJsonFieldOrdering { |
||||
// These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric |
||||
// order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either. |
||||
// This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output |
||||
// ordering. |
||||
// TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar, |
||||
// but doesn't include oneofs. |
||||
// TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although |
||||
// that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms. |
||||
// Alternatively, consider just adding this to |
||||
// unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it. |
||||
|
||||
int32 plain_int32 = 4; |
||||
|
||||
oneof o1 { |
||||
string o1_string = 2; |
||||
int32 o1_int32 = 5; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
string plain_string = 1; |
||||
|
||||
oneof o2 { |
||||
int32 o2_int32 = 6; |
||||
string o2_string = 3; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
syntax = "proto3"; |
||||
|
||||
// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect. |
||||
// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix. |
||||
|
||||
// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified |
||||
option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos"; |
||||
|
||||
package unittest_issues; |
||||
option optimize_for = SPEED; |
||||
|
||||
// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references |
||||
// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C. |
||||
message Issue307 { |
||||
message NestedOnce { |
||||
message NestedTwice { |
||||
} |
||||
} |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13 |
||||
// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309 |
||||
|
||||
// message A { |
||||
// optional int32 _A = 1; |
||||
// } |
||||
|
||||
// message B { |
||||
// optional int32 B_ = 1; |
||||
// } |
||||
|
||||
//message AB { |
||||
// optional int32 a_b = 1; |
||||
//} |
||||
|
||||
// Similar issue with numeric names |
||||
// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction. |
||||
// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308 |
||||
// message NumberField { |
||||
// optional int32 _01 = 1; |
||||
// } |
||||
|
||||
// issue 19 - negative enum values |
||||
|
||||
enum NegativeEnum { |
||||
NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0; |
||||
FiveBelow = -5; |
||||
MinusOne = -1; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
message NegativeEnumMessage { |
||||
NegativeEnum value = 1; |
||||
repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false]; |
||||
repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true]; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21 |
||||
// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete] |
||||
|
||||
message DeprecatedChild { |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
enum DeprecatedEnum { |
||||
DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0; |
||||
one = 1; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
message DeprecatedFieldsMessage { |
||||
int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
|
||||
DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
|
||||
DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true]; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45 |
||||
message ItemField { |
||||
int32 item = 1; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
message ReservedNames { |
||||
// Force a nested type called Types |
||||
message SomeNestedType { |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
int32 types = 1; |
||||
int32 descriptor = 2; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
message TestJsonFieldOrdering { |
||||
// These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric |
||||
// order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either. |
||||
// This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output |
||||
// ordering. |
||||
// TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar, |
||||
// but doesn't include oneofs. |
||||
// TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although |
||||
// that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms. |
||||
// Alternatively, consider just adding this to |
||||
// unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it. |
||||
|
||||
int32 plain_int32 = 4; |
||||
|
||||
oneof o1 { |
||||
string o1_string = 2; |
||||
int32 o1_int32 = 5; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
string plain_string = 1; |
||||
|
||||
oneof o2 { |
||||
int32 o2_int32 = 6; |
||||
string o2_string = 3; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
} |
Loading…
Reference in new issue