Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format (grpc依赖)
https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
39 lines
1.7 KiB
39 lines
1.7 KiB
17 years ago
|
Readme for the C#/.NET implementation of Protocol Buffers
|
||
|
|
||
|
Copyright 2008 Google Inc.
|
||
|
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/
|
||
|
and
|
||
|
http://github.com/jskeet/dotnet-protobufs
|
||
|
|
||
|
(This will eventually be written up into a full tutorial etc.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Differences with respect to the Java API
|
||
|
----------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Many of the changes are obvious "making it more like .NET", but
|
||
|
others are more subtle.
|
||
|
|
||
|
o Properties and indexers are used reasonably extensively.
|
||
|
o newFoo becomes CreateFoo everywhere.
|
||
|
o Classes are broken up much more - for instance, there are
|
||
|
namespaces for descriptors and field accessors, just to make it
|
||
|
easier to see what's going on.
|
||
|
o There's a mixture of generic and non-generic code. This
|
||
|
is interesting (at least if you're a language nerd). Java's generics
|
||
|
are somewhat different to those of .NET, partly due to type erasure
|
||
|
but in other ways too. .NET allows types to be overloaded by the
|
||
|
number of generic parameters, but there's no such thing as the
|
||
|
"raw" type of a generic type. Combining these two facts, I've
|
||
|
ended up with two interfaces for messages, and two for builders -
|
||
|
in each case, a non-generic one and a generic one which derives
|
||
|
from the generic one. Where the members clash (e.g. IBuilder.Build
|
||
|
and IBuilder<TMessage>.Build vary only by return type) the
|
||
|
implementations use explicit interface implementation to provide
|
||
|
the most useful method in most cases. This is very much like
|
||
|
the normal implementation of IEnumerable<T> which extends
|
||
|
IEnumerable. As an aside, this becomes a pain when trying to
|
||
|
create "the read-only version of this list, whose type I don't
|
||
|
know but I know it's a List<something>". Oh for mumble types.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|