Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format (grpc依赖) https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

315 lines
12 KiB

/*
* Copyright (c) 2009-2021, Google LLC
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
* * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
* * Neither the name of Google LLC nor the
* names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products
* derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
* AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Google LLC BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT,
* INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
* (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
* LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND
* ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
* SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
#include "upb/message/copy.h"
#include "upb/mem/arena.h"
#include "upb/message/accessors.h"
#include "upb/message/message.h"
// Must be last.
#include "upb/port/def.inc"
static bool upb_MessageField_IsMap(const upb_MiniTableField* field) {
return upb_FieldMode_Get(field) == kUpb_FieldMode_Map;
}
static upb_StringView upb_Clone_StringView(upb_StringView str,
upb_Arena* arena) {
if (str.size == 0) {
return upb_StringView_FromDataAndSize(NULL, 0);
}
void* cloned_data = upb_Arena_Malloc(arena, str.size);
upb_StringView cloned_str =
upb_StringView_FromDataAndSize(cloned_data, str.size);
memcpy(cloned_data, str.data, str.size);
return cloned_str;
}
static bool upb_Clone_MessageValue(void* value, upb_CType value_type,
const upb_MiniTable* sub, upb_Arena* arena) {
switch (value_type) {
case kUpb_CType_Bool:
case kUpb_CType_Float:
case kUpb_CType_Int32:
case kUpb_CType_UInt32:
case kUpb_CType_Enum:
case kUpb_CType_Double:
case kUpb_CType_Int64:
case kUpb_CType_UInt64:
return true;
case kUpb_CType_String:
case kUpb_CType_Bytes: {
upb_StringView source = *(upb_StringView*)value;
int size = source.size;
void* cloned_data = upb_Arena_Malloc(arena, size);
if (cloned_data == NULL) {
return false;
}
*(upb_StringView*)value =
upb_StringView_FromDataAndSize(cloned_data, size);
memcpy(cloned_data, source.data, size);
return true;
} break;
case kUpb_CType_Message: {
Added a new dynamic tree shaking model to upb, with the intention of removing the old model once YouTube has migrated. The `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` flag to the decoder will enable the new behavior. When that flag is not passed, tree shaking with the old model will still be possible. "Dynamic tree shaking" in upb is a feature that allows messages to be parsed even if the MiniTables have not been fully linked. Unlinked sub-message fields can be parsed by preserving their data in the unknown fields. If the application later discovers that the message field is actually needed, the MiniTable can be patched to properly link that field, and existing message instances can "promote" the data from the unknown fields to an actual message of the correct type. Before this change, dynamic tree shaking stored unparsed message data in the unknown fields of the *parent*. In effect, we were treating the field as if it did not exist at all. This meant that parsing an unlinked field did not affect the hasbits or oneof cases of the parent, nor did it create a `upb_Array` or `upb_Map` for array/map fields. Only when a message was linked and promoted did any of these things occur. While this model had some amount of conceptual simplicity, it caused significant problems with oneofs. When multiple fields inside a single oneof are parsed from the wire, order matters, because later oneof fields must overwrite earlier ones. Dynamic tree shaking can mean that some fields in a oneof are linked while others are not. It is essential that we preserve this ordering semantic even when dynamic tree shaking is being used, but it is difficult to do if the oneof's data can be split between linked fields (which have been reified into parsed field data) and unlinked fields (whose data lives in the unknown fields of the parent). To solve this problem, this CL changes the representation for unlinked fields. Instead of being placed in the parent's unknown fields, we create an actual message instance for each unlinked message we parse, but we use a placeholder "empty message" MiniTable as the message's type. All of the message's data will therefore be placed into the "empty message's" unknown fields. But unlike before, this "empty message" is actually present according to the hasbits, oneof case, and `upb_Array`/`upb_Map` of the parent. This means that all of the oneof presence logic works as normal. Since the MiniTable can be patched at any time, we need a bit in the message instance itself to signal whether a pointer to a sub-message is an "empty message" or not. When dynamic tree shaking is in use, all users must be capable of recognizing an empty message and acting accordingly (promoting, etc) even if the MiniTable itself says that the field is linked. Because dynamic tree shaking imposes this extra requirement on users, we require that users pass an extra option to the decoder to allow parsing of unlinked sub-messages. Many existing users of upb (Ruby, PHP, Python, etc) will always have fully-linked MiniTables, so there is no reason for them to add extra logic to handle empty messages. By omitting the `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` option, they will be relieved of the duty to check the tagged pointer that would indicate an empty, unlinked message. For existing users of dynamic tree shaking, there are three main changes: 1. The APIs in message/promote.h have changed, and users will need to update to the new interfaces. 2. The model for maps has changed slightly. Before, we required that map entries always had their values linked; for dynamic tree shaking to apply to maps, we required that the *entry* was left unlinked, not the entry's value. In the new model, that is reversed: map entries must always be linked, but a map entry's value can be unlinked. 3. The presence model for unlinked fields has changed. Unlinked fields will now register as "present" from the perspective of hasbits, oneof cases, and array/map entries. Users must test the tagged pointer to know if a message is of the correct, linked type or whether it is a placeholder "empty" message. There is a new function `upb_Message_GetTaggedMessagePtr()`, as well as a new accessor `upb_MessageValue.tagged_msg_val` that can be used to read and test the tagged pointer directly. PiperOrigin-RevId: 535288031
2 years ago
const upb_TaggedMessagePtr source = *(upb_TaggedMessagePtr*)value;
bool is_empty = upb_TaggedMessagePtr_IsEmpty(source);
if (is_empty) sub = &_kUpb_MiniTable_Empty;
UPB_ASSERT(source);
Added a new dynamic tree shaking model to upb, with the intention of removing the old model once YouTube has migrated. The `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` flag to the decoder will enable the new behavior. When that flag is not passed, tree shaking with the old model will still be possible. "Dynamic tree shaking" in upb is a feature that allows messages to be parsed even if the MiniTables have not been fully linked. Unlinked sub-message fields can be parsed by preserving their data in the unknown fields. If the application later discovers that the message field is actually needed, the MiniTable can be patched to properly link that field, and existing message instances can "promote" the data from the unknown fields to an actual message of the correct type. Before this change, dynamic tree shaking stored unparsed message data in the unknown fields of the *parent*. In effect, we were treating the field as if it did not exist at all. This meant that parsing an unlinked field did not affect the hasbits or oneof cases of the parent, nor did it create a `upb_Array` or `upb_Map` for array/map fields. Only when a message was linked and promoted did any of these things occur. While this model had some amount of conceptual simplicity, it caused significant problems with oneofs. When multiple fields inside a single oneof are parsed from the wire, order matters, because later oneof fields must overwrite earlier ones. Dynamic tree shaking can mean that some fields in a oneof are linked while others are not. It is essential that we preserve this ordering semantic even when dynamic tree shaking is being used, but it is difficult to do if the oneof's data can be split between linked fields (which have been reified into parsed field data) and unlinked fields (whose data lives in the unknown fields of the parent). To solve this problem, this CL changes the representation for unlinked fields. Instead of being placed in the parent's unknown fields, we create an actual message instance for each unlinked message we parse, but we use a placeholder "empty message" MiniTable as the message's type. All of the message's data will therefore be placed into the "empty message's" unknown fields. But unlike before, this "empty message" is actually present according to the hasbits, oneof case, and `upb_Array`/`upb_Map` of the parent. This means that all of the oneof presence logic works as normal. Since the MiniTable can be patched at any time, we need a bit in the message instance itself to signal whether a pointer to a sub-message is an "empty message" or not. When dynamic tree shaking is in use, all users must be capable of recognizing an empty message and acting accordingly (promoting, etc) even if the MiniTable itself says that the field is linked. Because dynamic tree shaking imposes this extra requirement on users, we require that users pass an extra option to the decoder to allow parsing of unlinked sub-messages. Many existing users of upb (Ruby, PHP, Python, etc) will always have fully-linked MiniTables, so there is no reason for them to add extra logic to handle empty messages. By omitting the `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` option, they will be relieved of the duty to check the tagged pointer that would indicate an empty, unlinked message. For existing users of dynamic tree shaking, there are three main changes: 1. The APIs in message/promote.h have changed, and users will need to update to the new interfaces. 2. The model for maps has changed slightly. Before, we required that map entries always had their values linked; for dynamic tree shaking to apply to maps, we required that the *entry* was left unlinked, not the entry's value. In the new model, that is reversed: map entries must always be linked, but a map entry's value can be unlinked. 3. The presence model for unlinked fields has changed. Unlinked fields will now register as "present" from the perspective of hasbits, oneof cases, and array/map entries. Users must test the tagged pointer to know if a message is of the correct, linked type or whether it is a placeholder "empty" message. There is a new function `upb_Message_GetTaggedMessagePtr()`, as well as a new accessor `upb_MessageValue.tagged_msg_val` that can be used to read and test the tagged pointer directly. PiperOrigin-RevId: 535288031
2 years ago
upb_Message* clone = upb_Message_DeepClone(
_upb_TaggedMessagePtr_GetMessage(source), sub, arena);
*(upb_TaggedMessagePtr*)value =
_upb_TaggedMessagePtr_Pack(clone, is_empty);
return clone != NULL;
} break;
}
UPB_UNREACHABLE();
}
upb_Map* upb_Map_DeepClone(const upb_Map* map, upb_CType key_type,
upb_CType value_type,
const upb_MiniTable* map_entry_table,
upb_Arena* arena) {
upb_Map* cloned_map = _upb_Map_New(arena, map->key_size, map->val_size);
if (cloned_map == NULL) {
return NULL;
}
upb_MessageValue key, val;
size_t iter = kUpb_Map_Begin;
while (upb_Map_Next(map, &key, &val, &iter)) {
const upb_MiniTableField* value_field = &map_entry_table->fields[1];
const upb_MiniTable* value_sub =
(value_field->UPB_PRIVATE(submsg_index) != kUpb_NoSub)
? upb_MiniTable_GetSubMessageTable(map_entry_table, value_field)
: NULL;
upb_CType value_field_type = upb_MiniTableField_CType(value_field);
if (!upb_Clone_MessageValue(&val, value_field_type, value_sub, arena)) {
return NULL;
}
if (upb_Map_Insert(cloned_map, key, val, arena) ==
kUpb_MapInsertStatus_OutOfMemory) {
return NULL;
}
}
return cloned_map;
}
static upb_Map* upb_Message_Map_DeepClone(const upb_Map* map,
const upb_MiniTable* mini_table,
const upb_MiniTableField* field,
upb_Message* clone,
upb_Arena* arena) {
const upb_MiniTable* map_entry_table =
mini_table->subs[field->UPB_PRIVATE(submsg_index)].submsg;
UPB_ASSERT(map_entry_table);
const upb_MiniTableField* key_field = &map_entry_table->fields[0];
const upb_MiniTableField* value_field = &map_entry_table->fields[1];
upb_Map* cloned_map = upb_Map_DeepClone(
map, upb_MiniTableField_CType(key_field),
upb_MiniTableField_CType(value_field), map_entry_table, arena);
if (!cloned_map) {
return NULL;
}
_upb_Message_SetNonExtensionField(clone, field, &cloned_map);
return cloned_map;
}
upb_Array* upb_Array_DeepClone(const upb_Array* array, upb_CType value_type,
const upb_MiniTable* sub, upb_Arena* arena) {
size_t size = array->size;
upb_Array* cloned_array =
_upb_Array_New(arena, size, _upb_Array_CTypeSizeLg2(value_type));
if (!cloned_array) {
return NULL;
}
if (!_upb_Array_ResizeUninitialized(cloned_array, size, arena)) {
return NULL;
}
for (size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
upb_MessageValue val = upb_Array_Get(array, i);
if (!upb_Clone_MessageValue(&val, value_type, sub, arena)) {
return false;
}
upb_Array_Set(cloned_array, i, val);
}
return cloned_array;
}
static bool upb_Message_Array_DeepClone(const upb_Array* array,
const upb_MiniTable* mini_table,
const upb_MiniTableField* field,
upb_Message* clone, upb_Arena* arena) {
_upb_MiniTableField_CheckIsArray(field);
upb_Array* cloned_array = upb_Array_DeepClone(
array, upb_MiniTableField_CType(field),
upb_MiniTableField_CType(field) == kUpb_CType_Message &&
field->UPB_PRIVATE(submsg_index) != kUpb_NoSub
? upb_MiniTable_GetSubMessageTable(mini_table, field)
: NULL,
arena);
// Clear out upb_Array* due to parent memcpy.
_upb_Message_SetNonExtensionField(clone, field, &cloned_array);
return true;
}
static bool upb_Clone_ExtensionValue(
const upb_MiniTableExtension* mini_table_ext,
const upb_Message_Extension* source, upb_Message_Extension* dest,
upb_Arena* arena) {
dest->data = source->data;
return upb_Clone_MessageValue(
&dest->data, upb_MiniTableField_CType(&mini_table_ext->field),
mini_table_ext->sub.submsg, arena);
}
upb_Message* _upb_Message_Copy(upb_Message* dst, const upb_Message* src,
const upb_MiniTable* mini_table,
upb_Arena* arena) {
upb_StringView empty_string = upb_StringView_FromDataAndSize(NULL, 0);
// Only copy message area skipping upb_Message_Internal.
memcpy(dst, src, mini_table->size);
for (size_t i = 0; i < mini_table->field_count; ++i) {
const upb_MiniTableField* field = &mini_table->fields[i];
if (!upb_IsRepeatedOrMap(field)) {
switch (upb_MiniTableField_CType(field)) {
case kUpb_CType_Message: {
Added a new dynamic tree shaking model to upb, with the intention of removing the old model once YouTube has migrated. The `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` flag to the decoder will enable the new behavior. When that flag is not passed, tree shaking with the old model will still be possible. "Dynamic tree shaking" in upb is a feature that allows messages to be parsed even if the MiniTables have not been fully linked. Unlinked sub-message fields can be parsed by preserving their data in the unknown fields. If the application later discovers that the message field is actually needed, the MiniTable can be patched to properly link that field, and existing message instances can "promote" the data from the unknown fields to an actual message of the correct type. Before this change, dynamic tree shaking stored unparsed message data in the unknown fields of the *parent*. In effect, we were treating the field as if it did not exist at all. This meant that parsing an unlinked field did not affect the hasbits or oneof cases of the parent, nor did it create a `upb_Array` or `upb_Map` for array/map fields. Only when a message was linked and promoted did any of these things occur. While this model had some amount of conceptual simplicity, it caused significant problems with oneofs. When multiple fields inside a single oneof are parsed from the wire, order matters, because later oneof fields must overwrite earlier ones. Dynamic tree shaking can mean that some fields in a oneof are linked while others are not. It is essential that we preserve this ordering semantic even when dynamic tree shaking is being used, but it is difficult to do if the oneof's data can be split between linked fields (which have been reified into parsed field data) and unlinked fields (whose data lives in the unknown fields of the parent). To solve this problem, this CL changes the representation for unlinked fields. Instead of being placed in the parent's unknown fields, we create an actual message instance for each unlinked message we parse, but we use a placeholder "empty message" MiniTable as the message's type. All of the message's data will therefore be placed into the "empty message's" unknown fields. But unlike before, this "empty message" is actually present according to the hasbits, oneof case, and `upb_Array`/`upb_Map` of the parent. This means that all of the oneof presence logic works as normal. Since the MiniTable can be patched at any time, we need a bit in the message instance itself to signal whether a pointer to a sub-message is an "empty message" or not. When dynamic tree shaking is in use, all users must be capable of recognizing an empty message and acting accordingly (promoting, etc) even if the MiniTable itself says that the field is linked. Because dynamic tree shaking imposes this extra requirement on users, we require that users pass an extra option to the decoder to allow parsing of unlinked sub-messages. Many existing users of upb (Ruby, PHP, Python, etc) will always have fully-linked MiniTables, so there is no reason for them to add extra logic to handle empty messages. By omitting the `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` option, they will be relieved of the duty to check the tagged pointer that would indicate an empty, unlinked message. For existing users of dynamic tree shaking, there are three main changes: 1. The APIs in message/promote.h have changed, and users will need to update to the new interfaces. 2. The model for maps has changed slightly. Before, we required that map entries always had their values linked; for dynamic tree shaking to apply to maps, we required that the *entry* was left unlinked, not the entry's value. In the new model, that is reversed: map entries must always be linked, but a map entry's value can be unlinked. 3. The presence model for unlinked fields has changed. Unlinked fields will now register as "present" from the perspective of hasbits, oneof cases, and array/map entries. Users must test the tagged pointer to know if a message is of the correct, linked type or whether it is a placeholder "empty" message. There is a new function `upb_Message_GetTaggedMessagePtr()`, as well as a new accessor `upb_MessageValue.tagged_msg_val` that can be used to read and test the tagged pointer directly. PiperOrigin-RevId: 535288031
2 years ago
upb_TaggedMessagePtr tagged =
upb_Message_GetTaggedMessagePtr(src, field, NULL);
const upb_Message* sub_message =
Added a new dynamic tree shaking model to upb, with the intention of removing the old model once YouTube has migrated. The `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` flag to the decoder will enable the new behavior. When that flag is not passed, tree shaking with the old model will still be possible. "Dynamic tree shaking" in upb is a feature that allows messages to be parsed even if the MiniTables have not been fully linked. Unlinked sub-message fields can be parsed by preserving their data in the unknown fields. If the application later discovers that the message field is actually needed, the MiniTable can be patched to properly link that field, and existing message instances can "promote" the data from the unknown fields to an actual message of the correct type. Before this change, dynamic tree shaking stored unparsed message data in the unknown fields of the *parent*. In effect, we were treating the field as if it did not exist at all. This meant that parsing an unlinked field did not affect the hasbits or oneof cases of the parent, nor did it create a `upb_Array` or `upb_Map` for array/map fields. Only when a message was linked and promoted did any of these things occur. While this model had some amount of conceptual simplicity, it caused significant problems with oneofs. When multiple fields inside a single oneof are parsed from the wire, order matters, because later oneof fields must overwrite earlier ones. Dynamic tree shaking can mean that some fields in a oneof are linked while others are not. It is essential that we preserve this ordering semantic even when dynamic tree shaking is being used, but it is difficult to do if the oneof's data can be split between linked fields (which have been reified into parsed field data) and unlinked fields (whose data lives in the unknown fields of the parent). To solve this problem, this CL changes the representation for unlinked fields. Instead of being placed in the parent's unknown fields, we create an actual message instance for each unlinked message we parse, but we use a placeholder "empty message" MiniTable as the message's type. All of the message's data will therefore be placed into the "empty message's" unknown fields. But unlike before, this "empty message" is actually present according to the hasbits, oneof case, and `upb_Array`/`upb_Map` of the parent. This means that all of the oneof presence logic works as normal. Since the MiniTable can be patched at any time, we need a bit in the message instance itself to signal whether a pointer to a sub-message is an "empty message" or not. When dynamic tree shaking is in use, all users must be capable of recognizing an empty message and acting accordingly (promoting, etc) even if the MiniTable itself says that the field is linked. Because dynamic tree shaking imposes this extra requirement on users, we require that users pass an extra option to the decoder to allow parsing of unlinked sub-messages. Many existing users of upb (Ruby, PHP, Python, etc) will always have fully-linked MiniTables, so there is no reason for them to add extra logic to handle empty messages. By omitting the `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` option, they will be relieved of the duty to check the tagged pointer that would indicate an empty, unlinked message. For existing users of dynamic tree shaking, there are three main changes: 1. The APIs in message/promote.h have changed, and users will need to update to the new interfaces. 2. The model for maps has changed slightly. Before, we required that map entries always had their values linked; for dynamic tree shaking to apply to maps, we required that the *entry* was left unlinked, not the entry's value. In the new model, that is reversed: map entries must always be linked, but a map entry's value can be unlinked. 3. The presence model for unlinked fields has changed. Unlinked fields will now register as "present" from the perspective of hasbits, oneof cases, and array/map entries. Users must test the tagged pointer to know if a message is of the correct, linked type or whether it is a placeholder "empty" message. There is a new function `upb_Message_GetTaggedMessagePtr()`, as well as a new accessor `upb_MessageValue.tagged_msg_val` that can be used to read and test the tagged pointer directly. PiperOrigin-RevId: 535288031
2 years ago
_upb_TaggedMessagePtr_GetMessage(tagged);
if (sub_message != NULL) {
Added a new dynamic tree shaking model to upb, with the intention of removing the old model once YouTube has migrated. The `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` flag to the decoder will enable the new behavior. When that flag is not passed, tree shaking with the old model will still be possible. "Dynamic tree shaking" in upb is a feature that allows messages to be parsed even if the MiniTables have not been fully linked. Unlinked sub-message fields can be parsed by preserving their data in the unknown fields. If the application later discovers that the message field is actually needed, the MiniTable can be patched to properly link that field, and existing message instances can "promote" the data from the unknown fields to an actual message of the correct type. Before this change, dynamic tree shaking stored unparsed message data in the unknown fields of the *parent*. In effect, we were treating the field as if it did not exist at all. This meant that parsing an unlinked field did not affect the hasbits or oneof cases of the parent, nor did it create a `upb_Array` or `upb_Map` for array/map fields. Only when a message was linked and promoted did any of these things occur. While this model had some amount of conceptual simplicity, it caused significant problems with oneofs. When multiple fields inside a single oneof are parsed from the wire, order matters, because later oneof fields must overwrite earlier ones. Dynamic tree shaking can mean that some fields in a oneof are linked while others are not. It is essential that we preserve this ordering semantic even when dynamic tree shaking is being used, but it is difficult to do if the oneof's data can be split between linked fields (which have been reified into parsed field data) and unlinked fields (whose data lives in the unknown fields of the parent). To solve this problem, this CL changes the representation for unlinked fields. Instead of being placed in the parent's unknown fields, we create an actual message instance for each unlinked message we parse, but we use a placeholder "empty message" MiniTable as the message's type. All of the message's data will therefore be placed into the "empty message's" unknown fields. But unlike before, this "empty message" is actually present according to the hasbits, oneof case, and `upb_Array`/`upb_Map` of the parent. This means that all of the oneof presence logic works as normal. Since the MiniTable can be patched at any time, we need a bit in the message instance itself to signal whether a pointer to a sub-message is an "empty message" or not. When dynamic tree shaking is in use, all users must be capable of recognizing an empty message and acting accordingly (promoting, etc) even if the MiniTable itself says that the field is linked. Because dynamic tree shaking imposes this extra requirement on users, we require that users pass an extra option to the decoder to allow parsing of unlinked sub-messages. Many existing users of upb (Ruby, PHP, Python, etc) will always have fully-linked MiniTables, so there is no reason for them to add extra logic to handle empty messages. By omitting the `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` option, they will be relieved of the duty to check the tagged pointer that would indicate an empty, unlinked message. For existing users of dynamic tree shaking, there are three main changes: 1. The APIs in message/promote.h have changed, and users will need to update to the new interfaces. 2. The model for maps has changed slightly. Before, we required that map entries always had their values linked; for dynamic tree shaking to apply to maps, we required that the *entry* was left unlinked, not the entry's value. In the new model, that is reversed: map entries must always be linked, but a map entry's value can be unlinked. 3. The presence model for unlinked fields has changed. Unlinked fields will now register as "present" from the perspective of hasbits, oneof cases, and array/map entries. Users must test the tagged pointer to know if a message is of the correct, linked type or whether it is a placeholder "empty" message. There is a new function `upb_Message_GetTaggedMessagePtr()`, as well as a new accessor `upb_MessageValue.tagged_msg_val` that can be used to read and test the tagged pointer directly. PiperOrigin-RevId: 535288031
2 years ago
// If the message is currently in an unlinked, "empty" state we keep
// it that way, because we don't want to deal with decode options,
// decode status, or possible parse failure here.
bool is_empty = upb_TaggedMessagePtr_IsEmpty(tagged);
const upb_MiniTable* sub_message_table =
Added a new dynamic tree shaking model to upb, with the intention of removing the old model once YouTube has migrated. The `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` flag to the decoder will enable the new behavior. When that flag is not passed, tree shaking with the old model will still be possible. "Dynamic tree shaking" in upb is a feature that allows messages to be parsed even if the MiniTables have not been fully linked. Unlinked sub-message fields can be parsed by preserving their data in the unknown fields. If the application later discovers that the message field is actually needed, the MiniTable can be patched to properly link that field, and existing message instances can "promote" the data from the unknown fields to an actual message of the correct type. Before this change, dynamic tree shaking stored unparsed message data in the unknown fields of the *parent*. In effect, we were treating the field as if it did not exist at all. This meant that parsing an unlinked field did not affect the hasbits or oneof cases of the parent, nor did it create a `upb_Array` or `upb_Map` for array/map fields. Only when a message was linked and promoted did any of these things occur. While this model had some amount of conceptual simplicity, it caused significant problems with oneofs. When multiple fields inside a single oneof are parsed from the wire, order matters, because later oneof fields must overwrite earlier ones. Dynamic tree shaking can mean that some fields in a oneof are linked while others are not. It is essential that we preserve this ordering semantic even when dynamic tree shaking is being used, but it is difficult to do if the oneof's data can be split between linked fields (which have been reified into parsed field data) and unlinked fields (whose data lives in the unknown fields of the parent). To solve this problem, this CL changes the representation for unlinked fields. Instead of being placed in the parent's unknown fields, we create an actual message instance for each unlinked message we parse, but we use a placeholder "empty message" MiniTable as the message's type. All of the message's data will therefore be placed into the "empty message's" unknown fields. But unlike before, this "empty message" is actually present according to the hasbits, oneof case, and `upb_Array`/`upb_Map` of the parent. This means that all of the oneof presence logic works as normal. Since the MiniTable can be patched at any time, we need a bit in the message instance itself to signal whether a pointer to a sub-message is an "empty message" or not. When dynamic tree shaking is in use, all users must be capable of recognizing an empty message and acting accordingly (promoting, etc) even if the MiniTable itself says that the field is linked. Because dynamic tree shaking imposes this extra requirement on users, we require that users pass an extra option to the decoder to allow parsing of unlinked sub-messages. Many existing users of upb (Ruby, PHP, Python, etc) will always have fully-linked MiniTables, so there is no reason for them to add extra logic to handle empty messages. By omitting the `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` option, they will be relieved of the duty to check the tagged pointer that would indicate an empty, unlinked message. For existing users of dynamic tree shaking, there are three main changes: 1. The APIs in message/promote.h have changed, and users will need to update to the new interfaces. 2. The model for maps has changed slightly. Before, we required that map entries always had their values linked; for dynamic tree shaking to apply to maps, we required that the *entry* was left unlinked, not the entry's value. In the new model, that is reversed: map entries must always be linked, but a map entry's value can be unlinked. 3. The presence model for unlinked fields has changed. Unlinked fields will now register as "present" from the perspective of hasbits, oneof cases, and array/map entries. Users must test the tagged pointer to know if a message is of the correct, linked type or whether it is a placeholder "empty" message. There is a new function `upb_Message_GetTaggedMessagePtr()`, as well as a new accessor `upb_MessageValue.tagged_msg_val` that can be used to read and test the tagged pointer directly. PiperOrigin-RevId: 535288031
2 years ago
is_empty ? &_kUpb_MiniTable_Empty
: upb_MiniTable_GetSubMessageTable(mini_table, field);
upb_Message* dst_sub_message =
upb_Message_DeepClone(sub_message, sub_message_table, arena);
if (dst_sub_message == NULL) {
return NULL;
}
Added a new dynamic tree shaking model to upb, with the intention of removing the old model once YouTube has migrated. The `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` flag to the decoder will enable the new behavior. When that flag is not passed, tree shaking with the old model will still be possible. "Dynamic tree shaking" in upb is a feature that allows messages to be parsed even if the MiniTables have not been fully linked. Unlinked sub-message fields can be parsed by preserving their data in the unknown fields. If the application later discovers that the message field is actually needed, the MiniTable can be patched to properly link that field, and existing message instances can "promote" the data from the unknown fields to an actual message of the correct type. Before this change, dynamic tree shaking stored unparsed message data in the unknown fields of the *parent*. In effect, we were treating the field as if it did not exist at all. This meant that parsing an unlinked field did not affect the hasbits or oneof cases of the parent, nor did it create a `upb_Array` or `upb_Map` for array/map fields. Only when a message was linked and promoted did any of these things occur. While this model had some amount of conceptual simplicity, it caused significant problems with oneofs. When multiple fields inside a single oneof are parsed from the wire, order matters, because later oneof fields must overwrite earlier ones. Dynamic tree shaking can mean that some fields in a oneof are linked while others are not. It is essential that we preserve this ordering semantic even when dynamic tree shaking is being used, but it is difficult to do if the oneof's data can be split between linked fields (which have been reified into parsed field data) and unlinked fields (whose data lives in the unknown fields of the parent). To solve this problem, this CL changes the representation for unlinked fields. Instead of being placed in the parent's unknown fields, we create an actual message instance for each unlinked message we parse, but we use a placeholder "empty message" MiniTable as the message's type. All of the message's data will therefore be placed into the "empty message's" unknown fields. But unlike before, this "empty message" is actually present according to the hasbits, oneof case, and `upb_Array`/`upb_Map` of the parent. This means that all of the oneof presence logic works as normal. Since the MiniTable can be patched at any time, we need a bit in the message instance itself to signal whether a pointer to a sub-message is an "empty message" or not. When dynamic tree shaking is in use, all users must be capable of recognizing an empty message and acting accordingly (promoting, etc) even if the MiniTable itself says that the field is linked. Because dynamic tree shaking imposes this extra requirement on users, we require that users pass an extra option to the decoder to allow parsing of unlinked sub-messages. Many existing users of upb (Ruby, PHP, Python, etc) will always have fully-linked MiniTables, so there is no reason for them to add extra logic to handle empty messages. By omitting the `kUpb_DecodeOption_ExperimentalAllowUnlinked` option, they will be relieved of the duty to check the tagged pointer that would indicate an empty, unlinked message. For existing users of dynamic tree shaking, there are three main changes: 1. The APIs in message/promote.h have changed, and users will need to update to the new interfaces. 2. The model for maps has changed slightly. Before, we required that map entries always had their values linked; for dynamic tree shaking to apply to maps, we required that the *entry* was left unlinked, not the entry's value. In the new model, that is reversed: map entries must always be linked, but a map entry's value can be unlinked. 3. The presence model for unlinked fields has changed. Unlinked fields will now register as "present" from the perspective of hasbits, oneof cases, and array/map entries. Users must test the tagged pointer to know if a message is of the correct, linked type or whether it is a placeholder "empty" message. There is a new function `upb_Message_GetTaggedMessagePtr()`, as well as a new accessor `upb_MessageValue.tagged_msg_val` that can be used to read and test the tagged pointer directly. PiperOrigin-RevId: 535288031
2 years ago
_upb_Message_SetTaggedMessagePtr(
dst, mini_table, field,
_upb_TaggedMessagePtr_Pack(dst_sub_message, is_empty));
}
} break;
case kUpb_CType_String:
case kUpb_CType_Bytes: {
upb_StringView str = upb_Message_GetString(src, field, empty_string);
if (str.size != 0) {
if (!upb_Message_SetString(
dst, field, upb_Clone_StringView(str, arena), arena)) {
return NULL;
}
}
} break;
default:
// Scalar, already copied.
break;
}
} else {
if (upb_MessageField_IsMap(field)) {
const upb_Map* map = upb_Message_GetMap(src, field);
if (map != NULL) {
if (!upb_Message_Map_DeepClone(map, mini_table, field, dst, arena)) {
return NULL;
}
}
} else {
const upb_Array* array = upb_Message_GetArray(src, field);
if (array != NULL) {
if (!upb_Message_Array_DeepClone(array, mini_table, field, dst,
arena)) {
return NULL;
}
}
}
}
}
// Clone extensions.
size_t ext_count;
const upb_Message_Extension* ext = _upb_Message_Getexts(src, &ext_count);
for (size_t i = 0; i < ext_count; ++i) {
const upb_Message_Extension* msg_ext = &ext[i];
const upb_MiniTableField* field = &msg_ext->ext->field;
upb_Message_Extension* dst_ext =
_upb_Message_GetOrCreateExtension(dst, msg_ext->ext, arena);
if (!dst_ext) return NULL;
if (!upb_IsRepeatedOrMap(field)) {
if (!upb_Clone_ExtensionValue(msg_ext->ext, msg_ext, dst_ext, arena)) {
return NULL;
}
} else {
upb_Array* msg_array = (upb_Array*)msg_ext->data.ptr;
UPB_ASSERT(msg_array);
upb_Array* cloned_array =
upb_Array_DeepClone(msg_array, upb_MiniTableField_CType(field),
msg_ext->ext->sub.submsg, arena);
if (!cloned_array) {
return NULL;
}
dst_ext->data.ptr = (void*)cloned_array;
}
}
// Clone unknowns.
size_t unknown_size = 0;
const char* ptr = upb_Message_GetUnknown(src, &unknown_size);
if (unknown_size != 0) {
UPB_ASSERT(ptr);
// Make a copy into destination arena.
void* dst_unknowns = upb_Arena_Malloc(arena, unknown_size);
if (dst_unknowns == NULL) return NULL;
memcpy(dst_unknowns, ptr, unknown_size);
if (!_upb_Message_AddUnknown(dst, dst_unknowns, unknown_size, arena)) {
return NULL;
}
}
return dst;
}
void upb_Message_DeepCopy(upb_Message* dst, const upb_Message* src,
const upb_MiniTable* mini_table, upb_Arena* arena) {
upb_Message_Clear(dst, mini_table);
_upb_Message_Copy(dst, src, mini_table, arena);
}
// Deep clones a message using the provided target arena.
//
// Returns NULL on failure.
upb_Message* upb_Message_DeepClone(const upb_Message* message,
const upb_MiniTable* mini_table,
upb_Arena* arena) {
upb_Message* clone = upb_Message_New(mini_table, arena);
return _upb_Message_Copy(clone, message, mini_table, arena);
}