Request for comments. This is my first PR.
**Merge with extra**: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1112
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/22747
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Try to enable Winograd by default in FP32 mode and disable it by default in FP16 mode #24709
An error occurred
Hopefully, it will resolve regressions since 4.8.1 (see also https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24587)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Merge with: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1128.
Attention operator spec from onnxruntime: https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/blob/v1.16.1/docs/ContribOperators.md#com.microsoft.Attention.
TODO:
- [x] benchmark (before this PR vs. with this PR vs. ORT).
- [x] Layer fusion: Take care Slice with end=INT64_MAX.
- [x] Layer fusion: match more potential attention (VIT) patterns.
- [x] Single-head attention is supported.
- [x] Test AttentionSubgraph fusion.
- [x] Add acc tests for VIT_B_32 and VitTrack
- [x] Add perf tests for VIT_B_32 and VitTrack
## Benchmarks
Platform: Macbook Air M1.
### Attention Subgraph
Input scale: [1, 197, 768].
| | mean (ms) | median (ms) | min (ms) |
| ---------------------- | --------- | ----------- | -------- |
| w/ Attention (this PR) | 3.75 | 3.68 | 3.22 |
| w/o Attention | 9.06 | 9.01 | 8.24 |
| ORT (python) | 4.32 | 2.63 | 2.50 |
### ViTs
All data in millisecond (ms).
| ViTs | With Attention | Without Attention | ORT |
| -------- | -------------- | ----------------- | ------ |
| vit_b_16 | 302.77 | 365.35 | 109.70 |
| vit_b_32 | 89.92 | 116.22 | 30.36 |
| vit_l_16 | 1593.32 | 1730.74 | 419.92 |
| vit_l_32 | 468.11 | 577.41 | 134.12 |
| VitTrack | 3.80 | 3.87 | 2.25 |
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Done:
- [x] add backends
- [x] CUDA
- [x] OpenVINO
- [x] CANN
- [x] OpenCL
- [x] Vulkan
- [x] add perf tests
- [x] const B case
### Benchmark
Tests are done on M1. All data is in milliseconds (ms).
| Configuration | MatMul (Prepacked) | MatMul | InnerProduct |
| - | - | - | - |
| A=[12, 197, 197], B=[12, 197, 64], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.39** | 0.41 | 1.33 |
| A=[12, 197, 64], B=[12, 64, 197], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.42** | 0.42 | 1.17 |
| A=[12, 50, 64], B=[12, 64, 50], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.13** | 0.15 | 0.33 |
| A=[12, 50, 50], B=[12, 50, 64], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.11** | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| A=[16, 197, 197], B=[16, 197, 64], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.46** | 0.54 | 1.46 |
| A=[16, 197, 64], B=[16, 64, 197], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.46** | 0.95 | 1.74 |
| A=[16, 50, 64], B=[16, 64, 50], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.18** | 0.32 | 0.43 |
| A=[16, 50, 50], B=[16, 50, 64], trans_a=0, trans_b=0 | **0.15** | 0.25 | 0.25 |
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Classify and extend convolution and depthwise performance tests #24547
An error occurred
This PR aims to:
1. Extend the test cases from models: `YOLOv5`, `YOLOv8`, `EfficientNet`, `YOLOX`, `YuNet`, `SFace`, `MPPalm`, `MPHand`, `MPPose`, `ViTTrack`, `PPOCRv3`, `CRNN`, `PPHumanSeg`. (371 new test cases are added)
2. Classify the existing convolution performance test to below cases
- CONV_1x1
- CONV_3x3_S1_D1 (winograd)
- CONV
- DEPTHWISE
3. Reduce unnecessary test cases by follow 3 rules (366 test cases are pruned):
(i). For all tests, except for pad and bias related parameters, all other parameters are the same. Only one case can be reserved.
(ii). When the only difference is the channel of input shape, and other parameters are the same. Only one case can be reserved in each range `[1, 3], [4, 7], [8, 15], [16, 31], [32, 63], [64, 127], [128, 255], [256, 511], [512, 1023], [1024, 2047], [2048, 4095]`
(iii). When the only difference is the width and height of input shape, and other parameters are the same. Only one case can be reserved in each range `[1, 31], [32, 63], [64, 95]... `
> **Reproduced**: 1. follow step in https://github.com/alalek/opencv/commit/dnn_dump_conv_kernels to dump all convolution cases from new models. (declared flops may not right, need to be checked manually) 2 and 3. Use the script from python code [classify conv.txt](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/13522228/classify.conv.txt)
**Performance test result on Apple M2**
**Test result details**: [M2.md](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/13379189/M2.md)
**Additional test result details with FP16**: [m2_results_with_fp16.zip](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/13491070/m2_results_with_fp16.zip)
**Brief summary for 4.8.1 vs 4.7.0 or 4.6.0**:
1. `CONV_1x1_S1_D1` dropped significant with small or large input shape.
2. `DEPTHWISE_5x5 ` dropped a little compared with 4.7.0.
---
**Performance test result on [Intel Core i7-12700K](https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/134594/intel-core-i712700k-processor-25m-cache-up-to-5-00-ghz/specifications.html)**: 8 Performance-cores (3.60 GHz, turbo up to 4.90 GHz), 4 Efficient-cores (2.70 GHz, turbo up to 3.80 GHz), 20 threads.
**Test result details**: [INTEL.md](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/files/13374093/INTEL.md)
**Brief summary for 4.8.1 vs 4.5.5**:
1. `CONV_5x5_S1_D1` dropped significant.
2. `CONV_1x1_S1_D1`, `CONV_3x3_S1_D1`, `DEPTHWISE_3x3_S1_D1`, `DEPTHWISW_3x3_S2_D1` dropped with small input shape.
---
TODO:
- [x] Perform tests on arm with each opencv version
- [x] Perform tests on x86 with each opencv version
- [x] Split each test classification with single test config
- [x] test enable fp16
This PR adds test for YOLOv6 model (which was absent before)
The onnx weights for the test are located in this PR [ #1126
An error occurred
](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1126)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Related https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24606#issuecomment-1837390257
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn onnx graph simplifier: handle optional inputs of Slice #24655
An error occurred
Resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24609
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add support for custom padding in DNN preprocessing #24569
An error occurred
This PR add functionality for specifying value in padding.
It is required in many preprocessing pipelines in DNNs such as Yolox object detection model
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24568
**Merge with extra**: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1125
TODO:
- [x] replace recursive function to sequential
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ X] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ X] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ X] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ X] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn: add openvino, opencl and cuda backends for layer normalization layer #24552
An error occurred
Merge after https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24544.
Todo:
- [x] openvino
- [x] opencl
- [x] cuda
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
* add Winograd FP16 implementation
* fixed dispatching of FP16 code paths in dnn; use dynamic dispatcher only when NEON_FP16 is enabled in the build and the feature is present in the host CPU at runtime
* fixed some warnings
* hopefully fixed winograd on x64 (and maybe other platforms)
---------
Co-authored-by: Vadim Pisarevsky <vadim.pisarevsky@gmail.com>
dnn test: move layer norm tests into conformance tests #24544
An error occurred
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1122
## Motivation
Some ONNX operators, such as `LayerNormalization`, `BatchNormalization` and so on, produce outputs for training (mean, stdev). So they have reference outputs of conformance tests for those training outputs as well. However, when it comes to inference, we do not need and produce those outputs for training here in dnn. Hence, output size does not match if we use dnn to infer those conformance models. This has become the barrier if we want to test these operators using their conformance tests.
<!--
| Operator | Inference needed | Outputs (required - total) | Optional outputs for training? |
| ----------------------- | ----------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| BatchNormalization | Yes | 1 - 3 | Yes |
| Dropout | Maybe, can be eliminated via fusion | 1 - 2 | Yes |
| GRU | Yes | 0 - 2 | No |
| LSTM | Yes | 0 - 3 | No |
| LayerNormalization | Yes | 1 - 3 | Yes |
| MaxPool | Yes | 1 - 2 | Yes |
| RNN | Yes | 0 - 2 | No |
| SoftmaxCrossEntropyLoss | No | 1 - 2 | -- |
-->
**I checked all ONNX operators with optional outputs. Turns out there are only `BatchNormalization`, `Dropout`, `LayerNormalization` and `MaxPool` has optional outputs for training. All except `LayerNormalization` have models set for training mode and eval mode. Blame ONNX for that.**
## Solution
In this pull request, we remove graph outputs if the graph looks like the following:
```
[X] [Scale] [Bias] [X] [Scale] [Bias]
\ | / this patch \ | /
LayerNormalization -----------> LayerNormalization
/ | \ |
[Y] [Mean] [Stdev] [Y]
```
We can update conformance tests and turn on some cases as well if extending to more layers.
Notes:
1. This workaround does not solve expanded function operators if they are fused into a single operator, such as `$onnx/onnx/backend/test/data/node/test_layer_normalization_2d_axis1_expanded`, but they can be run without fusion. Note that either dnn or onnxruntime does not fuse those expanded function operators.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
## This PR adds performance tests for Einsum Layer with FastGemm. See below results of performance test on different inputs
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Enable softmax layer vectorization on RISC-V RVV #24510
An error occurred
Related: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24466
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
related: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24463#issuecomment-1783033931
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24377
Relates https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24092#discussion_r1349841644
| Perf | multi-thread | single-thread |
| - | - | - |
| x: [2, 64, 180, 240] | 3.95ms | 11.12ms |
Todo:
- [x] speed up by multi-threading
- [x] add perf
- [x] add backend: OpenVINO
- [x] add backend: CUDA
- [x] add backend: OpenCL (no fp16)
- [ ] add backend: CANN (will be done via https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24462)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
```
force_builders=Linux OpenCL,Win64 OpenCL,Custom
buildworker:Custom=linux-4
build_image:Custom=ubuntu:18.04
modules_filter:Custom=none
disable_ipp:Custom=ON
```
* improve and refactor softmax layer
* fix building error
* compatible region layer
* fix axisStep when disable SIMD
* fix dynamic array
* try to fix error
* use nlanes from VTraits
* move axisBias to srcOffset
* fix bug caused by axisBias
* remove macro
* replace #ifdef with #if for CV_SIMD
dnn: add shared fastNorm kernel for mvn, instance norm and layer norm #24409
An error occurred
Relates https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24378#issuecomment-1756906570
TODO:
- [x] add fastNorm
- [x] refactor layer norm with fastNorm
- [x] refactor mvn with fastNorm
- [ ] add onnx mvn in importer (in a new PR?)
- [ ] refactor instance norm with fastNorm (in another PR https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/24378, need to merge this one first though)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
This PR added addresses issues not covered in #24037
An error occurred
. Namely these are:
Test case for this patch is in this PR [#1106
An error occurred
](https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1106) in opencv extra
Added:
- [x] Broadcasting reduction "...ii ->...I"
- [x] Add lazy shape deduction. "...ij, ...jk->...ik"
Features to add:
- [ ] Add implicit output computation support. "bij,bjk ->" (output subscripts should be "bik")
- [ ] Add support for CUDA backend
- [ ] BatchWiseMultiply optimize
- [ ] Performance test
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Pertaining Issue: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/5697
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn: fix HAVE_TIMVX macro definition in dnn test #24425
An error occurred
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or other license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to proper branch
- [x] There is reference to original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Supporting protobuf v22 and later(with abseil-cpp/C++17) #24372
An error occurred
fix https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24369
related https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/23791
1. This patch supports external protobuf v22 and later, it required abseil-cpp and c++17.
Even if the built-in protobuf is upgraded to v22 or later,
the dependency on abseil-cpp and the requirement for C++17 will continue.
2. Some test for caffe required patched protobuf, so this patch disable them.
This patch is tested by following libraries.
- Protobuf: /usr/local/lib/libprotobuf.so (4.24.4)
- abseil-cpp: YES (20230125)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
When exclusive is false:
dst[i] = dst[i-1] + src[i]
When exclusive is true:
dst[i] = dst[i-1] + src[i-1]
So CumSum layer can be inplace only when exclusive flag is false.
* remove Conformance from test names
* integrate neon optimization into default
* quick fix: define CV_NEON_AARCH64 0 for non NEON platforms
* remove var batch that leads to memory leak
* put neon code back to fast_gemm_kernels.simd
* reorganize code to reduce duplicate code
Alexander Alekhin
Dmitry Kurtaev
Dhanwanth1803
Alexander Smorkalov
Vadim Pisarevsky
Yuantao Feng
Laurent Berger
Wanli
Abduragim Shtanchaev
skycat8
Yuantao Feng
zihaomu
Alexander Smorkalov
Kumataro
Amir Hassan
andrewerf
Aser Atawya
alexlyulkov
Liutong HAN
Sean McBride