Search in two directions when try to add new quad in addOuterQuad #25807
In ChessBoardDetector::addOuterQuad, previous code try to connect new quad with inner quad, if possible, but only search for one direction. I have made three test images, one is normal(a.jpg), one lossed an outer quad(b.jpg), and then i flipped it vertically(c.jpg). Only last one fails. I fixed it by check two directions and row/col.
Here is the test code and images:
```
Mat img;
vector<Point2f> corners;
auto size = cv::Size(6, 6);
img = imread("D:/tmp/a.jpg", 0);
std::cout<<cv::findChessboardCorners(img, size, corners)<<"\n";
std::cout << corners.size() << "\n";
img = imread("D:/tmp/b.jpg", 0);
std::cout<<cv::findChessboardCorners(img, size, corners)<<"\n";
std::cout << corners.size() << "\n";
img = imread("D:/tmp/c.jpg", 0);
std::cout<<cv::findChessboardCorners(img, size, corners)<<"\n";
std::cout << corners.size() << "\n";
```
a
b
c
Properly check markers when none are provided. #25938
CharucoDetectorImpl::detectBoard finds temporary markers when none are provided but those are discarded when
charucoDetectorImpl::checkBoard is called.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
HAL for dot product added #25936
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
videoio: fix cv::VideoWriter with FFmpeg encapsulation timestamps #25874
Fix https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25873 by modifying `cv::VideoWriter` to use provided presentation indices (pts).
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
dnn: optimize activations with v_exp #25881
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1191.
This PR optimizes the following activations:
- [x] Swish
- [x] Mish
- [x] Elu
- [x] Celu
- [x] Selu
- [x] HardSwish
### Performance (Updated on 2024-07-18)
#### AmLogic A311D2 (ARM Cortex A73 + A53)
```
Geometric mean (ms)
Name of Test activations activations.patch activations.patch
vs
activations
(x-factor)
Celu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 115.859 27.930 4.15
Elu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 27.846 27.003 1.03
Gelu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 0.657 0.602 1.09
HardSwish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 31.885 6.781 4.70
Mish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 35.729 32.089 1.11
Selu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 61.955 27.850 2.22
Swish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 30.819 26.688 1.15
```
#### Apple M1
```
Geometric mean (ms)
Name of Test activations activations.patch activations.patch
vs
activations
(x-factor)
Celu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 16.184 2.118 7.64
Celu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU_FP16 16.280 2.123 7.67
Elu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 9.123 1.878 4.86
Elu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU_FP16 9.085 1.897 4.79
Gelu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 0.089 0.081 1.11
Gelu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU_FP16 0.086 0.074 1.17
HardSwish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 1.560 1.555 1.00
HardSwish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU_FP16 1.536 1.523 1.01
Mish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 6.077 2.476 2.45
Mish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU_FP16 5.990 2.496 2.40
Selu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 11.351 1.976 5.74
Selu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU_FP16 11.533 1.985 5.81
Swish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 4.687 1.890 2.48
Swish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU_FP16 4.715 1.873 2.52
```
#### Intel i7-12700K
```
Geometric mean (ms)
Name of Test activations activations.patch activations.patch
vs
activations
(x-factor)
Celu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 17.106 3.560 4.81
Elu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 5.064 3.478 1.46
Gelu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 0.036 0.035 1.04
HardSwish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 2.914 2.893 1.01
Mish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 3.820 3.529 1.08
Selu::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 10.799 3.593 3.01
Swish::Layer_Elementwise::OCV/CPU 3.651 3.473 1.05
```
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Upgrade RISC-V Vector intrinsic and cleanup the obsolete RVV backend. #25883
This patch upgrade RISC-V Vector intrinsic from `v0.10` to `v0.12`/`v1.0`:
- Update cmake check and options;
- Upgrade RVV implement for Universal Intrinsic;
- Upgrade RVV optimized DNN kernel.
- Cleanup the obsolete RVV backend (`intrin_rvv.hpp`) and compatable header file.
With this patch, RVV backend require Clang 17+ or GCC 14+ (which means `__riscv_v_intrinsic >= 12000`, see https://godbolt.org/z/es7ncETE3)
This patch is test with Clang 17.0.6 (require extra `-DWITH_PNG=OFF` due to ICE), Clang 18.1.8 and GCC 14.1.0 on QEMU and k230 (with `--gtest_filter="*hal_*"`).
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add a check for src == dst in ocl warpTransform #25898
As mentioned in #25853, when doing WarpAffine with Mat and UMat respectively, if you force the use of the in-place operation (so that src and dst are passed the same variables), Mat produces the correct results, but UMat produces unexpected results.
Obviously in-place operations are not possible with this transformation. When Mat performs the operation, if dst and src are the same variable, the function inherently makes a copy of src without telling the user.
74b50c7af0/modules/imgproc/src/imgwarp.cpp (L2831-L2834)
So I did the same check in UMat, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate, should we just do a copy operation without telling the user (even if the user thinks he's doing an in-place operation), or should we throw an exception to indicate that we shouldn't pass in two same variables here?
The possible reason for this problem is that there is a create function here, so it gives the developer the false impression that this create function has allocated new memory for dst, however it does not.
74b50c7af0/modules/imgproc/src/imgwarp.cpp (L2607-L2609)
Because by the time the check is done here, the function has returned back.
74b50c7af0/modules/core/src/umatrix.cpp (L668-L675)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add tutorial on using Orbbec 3D cameras (UVC) #25907
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
code clean #25931
Align code and remove redundant CMake code
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Support OpenGL GTK3 New API #25822Fixes#20001
GSoC2024 Project
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
calib3d: fix Rodrigues CV_32F and CV_64F type mismatch in projectPoints #25824Fixes#25318
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added flag to GaussianBlur for faster but not bit-exact implementation #25792
Rationale:
Current implementation of GaussianBlur is almost always bit-exact. It helps to get predictable results according platforms, but prohibits most of approximations and optimization tricks.
The patch converts `borderType` parameter to more generic `flags` and introduces `GAUSS_ALLOW_APPROXIMATIONS` flag to allow not bit-exact implementation. With the flag IPP and generic HAL implementation are called first. The flag naming and location is a subject for discussion.
Replaces https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/22073
Possibly related issue: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24135
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Mark cv::Mat(Mat&&) as noexcept #25899
This fixes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25065
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Handling I32/I64 data types in G-API ONNX back-end #25817
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Alexander Smorkalov
Kumataro
Alexander Lyulkov
武士风度的牛
Vincent Rabaud
Alexander Smorkalov
Rostislav Vasilikhin
cudawarped
Alexander Alekhin
Yuantao Feng
HAN Liutong
_Ayaka
eplankin
Andy-SAKN
zihaomu
Yang Chao
Richard Barnes
Corentin Noël
Yoshiki Obinata
j3knk
lamiayous
richard28039
Suleyman TURKMEN