Meson is not warning if you join paths with / but you are requesting a
version older than 0.49.0; fix this before adding more features to the
division operator.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The current node is useful to pass as location kwarg to mlog.warning().
The node is not passed to InterpreterObject method arguments, and it's
easier to have it on the object than passing it through argument
everywhere.
When dependency(), find_library(), find_program(), or
python.find_installation() return a not-found object and disabler is
true, they return a Disabler object instead.
Instead of just printing the message in the exception, if it's
a MesonException, also print the file and the line number. If it's an
unknown exception, print the entire traceback so that we can pin-point
what the Meson bug causing it is.
We now pass the current subproject to every FeatureNew and
FeatureDeprecated call. This requires a bunch of rework to:
1. Ensure that we have access to the subproject in the list of
arguments when used as a decorator (see _get_callee_args).
2. Pass the subproject to .use() when it's called manually.
3. We also can't do feature checks for new features in
meson_options.txt because that's parsed before we know the
meson_version from project()
* Use _get_callee_args to unwrap function call arguments, needed for
module functions.
* Move some FeatureNewKwargs from build.py to interpreter.py
* Print a summary for featurenew only if conflicts were found. The
summary now only prints conflicting features.
* Report and store featurenew/featuredeprecated only once
* Fix version comparison: use le/ge and resize arrays to not fail on
'0.47.0>=0.47'
Closes https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/3660
For now dicts are immutable, and do not expose any methods,
they however support "native" syntax such as [] lookup,
and foreach iterating, and can be printed.
This can help future generations avoid mistakes like this:
edb1c66239
To avoid breaking builds, this is currently just an error. After
sufficient time has passed this can hopefully become a hard error,
similarly to the already-existing `permittedKwargs` warnings.
Since PR #2884, this is failing with an exception
Keep the behaviour we have had since PR #1810 (0.41.0), that ordering
comparisons of different types fail with an InterpreterException.
Also warn about equality comparisons of different types, which will one day
become an error, as per PR #2884.