The Intel compiler is strange. On Linux and macOS it's called ICC, and
it tries to mostly behave like gcc/clang. On Windows it's called ICL,
and tries to behave like MSVC. This makes the code that's used to
implement ICC support useless for supporting ICL, because their command
line interfaces are completely different.
This restrictuion exists for MSVC and clang-cl, but not for ICL which
actually does support C++11 as a distinct standard. This commmit pulls
that behavior out into a mixin class for ClangClCPPCompiler and
VisualStudioCPPCompiler, as well as moving the MSVC specific
functionality into the VisualStudioCPPCompiler class.
Currently C++ inherits C, which can lead to diamond problems. By pulling
the code out into a standalone mixin class that the C, C++, ObjC, and
Objc++ compilers can inherit and override as necessary we remove one
source of diamonding. I've chosen to split this out into it's own file
as the CLikeCompiler class is over 1000 lines by itself. This also
breaks the VisualStudio derived classes inheriting from each other, to
avoid the same C -> CPP inheritance problems. This is all one giant
patch because there just isn't a clean way to separate this.
I've done the same for Fortran since it effectively inherits the
CCompiler (I say effectively because was it actually did was gross
beyond explanation), it's probably not correct, but it seems to work for
now. There really is a lot of layering violation going on in the
Compilers, and a really good scrubbing would do this code a lot of good.
Mypy know what to do with these and isn't confused, but some versions of
python 3.5 (at least 3.5.2) can't handle these annotations. By making
them strings the python interpreter wont try to evaluate them.
Fixes#5326
When we create a dependency as part of another dependency (say Threads),
we want to pass down most of the methods (like required). Currently
however, there is the possibility that we can pass down invalid keyword
arguments, such as 'method'. This new method is meant to work around
that my simplifying and centralizing how we pass these dependencies
down.
For consistency, it can be useful to have an explicit empty test suite list
for a test:
test('test-name', binary, suite: [])
This currently passes meson but fails when running meson tests:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mesonbuild/mesonmain.py", line 122, in run
return options.run_func(options)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mesonbuild/mtest.py", line 1005, in run
return th.doit()
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mesonbuild/mtest.py", line 756, in doit
self.run_tests(tests)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mesonbuild/mtest.py", line 896, in run_tests
visible_name = self.get_pretty_suite(test)
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/mesonbuild/mtest.py", line 875, in get_pretty_suite
rv = TestHarness.split_suite_string(test.suite[0])[0]
IndexError: list index out of range
Fix it by simply checking for the test suite to be a valid list we can pass on
Fixes#5340
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Some things, like `method[...](...)` or `x: ... = ...` python 3.5
doesn't support, so I made a comment instead with the intention that it
can someday be made into a real annotation.
Dylan Baker
Daniel Mensinger
nicole mazzuca
Simon Ney
myd7349
Daniel Eklöf
Clouds
Jon Turney
Ross Burton
Martin Hostettler
Michael Hirsch, Ph.D
Peter Hutterer
Jussi Pakkanen
John Ericson
Michael Olbrich
TheQwertiest