The $CI environment variable may be generally set by Github or Gitlab
actions, and is not a reliable indicator of whether we are running "CI".
It could also, for an absolutely random example that didn't *just
happen*, be Alpine Linux's attempt to enable the Meson testsuite in
their packaging, which... uses Gitlab CI.
In this case, we do want to perform normal skipping on not-found
requirements. Instead of checking for $CI, check for $MESON_CI_JOBNAME
as we already use that in all of our own CI jobs for various reasons.
This makes it easier for linux distros to package Meson without
accumulating hacks like "run the testsuite using `env -u CI`".
Now cygwin seems to have completed a migration of the default python to
3.9, so that is where the devel package is at.
Back out the changes from commit 3304a38496
and update the pip/wheel packages as appropriate.
For a long time now, this has done 3 different things, only one of which
is mypy. But they are labeled:
- LintMypy / lint
(runs pylint)
- LintMypy / custom_lint
(runs a custom script)
- LintMypy / mypy
(actually runs mypy)
This reduces the usable length of the label which isn't all that long to
begin with, is actively misleading, and even when you know what is going
on, it becomes harder to tell at a glance what failed. Change it to be
more unambiguous.
multiple versions of python are packaged by cygwin, and the default
python is auto-selected as the latest one via a Debian-like alternatives
system.
This recently broke because dblatex is built against 3.9, causing it to
be installed too and resulting in multiple (inconsistent) versions of
python being installed, and `python3` pointing to the one we don't have
devel packages for and isn't even the default version.
Fix this by pointing back to the intended python.
Previously the meson test case would only test boost-python on linux.
With the #7909 it is now possible to use boost-python on macOS/homebrew.
This enables the boost-python test on both linux and macOS.
It also uses python.extension_module() instead of shared_library to make the
python extension module.
code coverage may be interesting to some people as an informational
update, but it's really fragile and sometimes obscure, and overall we
would really like to NOT have most PRs reporting a red X in the CI
overview, when all project/unittests succeeded but codecov decides that
by some inscrutbale metric, coverage by % has dropped.
Elegant refactorings are penalized, because removing lines of code or
rewriting them to be more compact, means the overall percentage of
covered code is "less", even though no uncovered code got added.
Even worse, the coverage reports often erroneously complain that a PR
has "added lines #L<num> - L<num> were not covered by tests" even though
github helpfully points out they are "Unchanged files with check
annotations". Or more generally, codecov claims that coverage has
dropped in code which the PR can't touch.
The whole thing is just too much of a source of trouble. So, configure
codecov to consider all PRs as successful no matter what. It is still
welcome to leave informational comments, though.
Set MESON_CI_JOBNAME for all CI jobs which run project tests.
(Note that ${{ github.job }} is the literal job.id used in the yaml, not
any name given to the job with job.id.name, and so is the same for all
matrix entries, and thus not suitable for our purposes there).
Remove hard-coded framework test skip logic in skippable(), instead
annotate test.json with environments in which skip is expected.
(Mainly this is done with by testing the value of MESON_CI_JOBNAME now
set for linux jobs)
Split out checking of file format as a separate GitHub workflow, rather
than running it as part of the project tests for every platform and
toolchain combination in CI, so that this test is not effected by the
changed paths constraints which are applied to the project tests.
The 'build images' workflow runs on a schedule, so will run (and fail)
weekly in every fork.
Don't try to push to docker if docker credentials aren't in repository
secrets.
(A test for that has to be written rather indirectly due to
https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/520)
* CI: Don't run cross-only test when other workflows are changed
* CI: Move Cygwin test run from Azure Pipelines to GitHub workflow
Also review installed package list, dropping detritus from 42792554, not
removed in f5ed85d7.
Some changes:
* Set HOME to /root, since github mounts its own HOME and 'wine'
(because of permissions) and 'dub' (can't find packages) don't
like that.
* Remove the seccomp option, doesn't seem to be needed.
Fixes a test when using pkgconf instead of pkg-config.
The .pc file in the pkgconfig-gen test requires it and pkgconf seems be
stricter here and fails to validate.
Add '--cross-only' option to run_tests.py, so we can arrange not to run
tests in the 'native' suite when only a cross-compiler is available, as
they can't succeed.
Eli Schwartz
Stone Tickle
Dylan Baker
Christian Clauss
Daniel Mensinger
Xavier Claessens
Kevin Meagher
Jon Turney
Nirbheek Chauhan
Christoph Reiter
Jussi Pakkanen
Michael Hirsch