There are two problems, one is that it assumes -flto is the argument
to do LTO/WPO, which isn't true of ICC and MSVC (and presumably)
others. It's also incorrect because it assumes that the compiler and
linker will always be the same, which isn't necessarily true. You
could combine GCC with Apple's linker, or clang with link.exe, which
use different arguments.
Error example:
Code:
#include <locale.h>
int main () {
/* If it's not defined as a macro, try to use as a symbol */
#ifndef LC_MESSAGES
LC_MESSAGES;
#endif
}
Compiler stdout:
Compiler stderr:
In file included from /usr/include/locale.h:25,
from /tmp/tmpep_i4iwg/testfile.c:2:
/usr/include/features.h:382:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
382 | # warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
| ^~~~~~~
/tmp/tmpep_i4iwg/testfile.c: In function 'main':
/tmp/tmpep_i4iwg/testfile.c:8:9: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
8 | }
| ^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
There is a pretty big error in here, trying to return a tuple
comperhension: (a for a in []) is not a tuple, it's a generator. This
has profound type annotations: generators don't support most tuple or
list methods, and they can only be iterated once. Beyond that tuples are
meant for heterogenous types, ie, position matters for types. I've
converted the output to a list in all cases.
The compilers module is rather large and confusing, with spaghetti
dependencies going every which way. I'm planning to start breaking out
the internal representations into a mixins submodule, for things that
shouldn't be required outside of the compilers module itself.
Dylan Baker
Martin Liska