It works fine as-is with an empty list, and since that's easier to get
using our typed_kwargs, and thus is what we're passing, go ahead and
simplify the class to only take a list of strings.
It's supposed to emit an error message, but instead it did a traceback.
It used to be, if no install_dir was specified then it was simply not in
kwargs, but due to typed_kwargs it will now be there, but not have
viable contents, so the dict membership check got skipped.
Fixes#9522
This replaces the absolute hack of using
```
install_subdir('nonexisting', install_dir: 'share')
```
which requires you to make sure you don't accidentally or deliberately
have a completely different directory with the same name in your source
tree that is full of files you don't want installed. It also avoids
splitting the name in two and listing them in the wrong order.
You can also set the install mode of each directory component by listing
them one at a time in order, and in fact create nested structures at
all.
Fixes#1604
Properly fixes#2904
To be able to handle link_depends in backends that do not just operate on a
file basis like ninja, information about the targets, not just their output is
required.
All changes were created by running
"pyupgrade --py3-only"
and committing the results. Although this has been performed in the
past, newer versions of pyupgrade can automatically catch more
opportunities, notably list comprehensions can use generators instead,
in the following cases:
- unpacking into function arguments as function(*generator)
- unpacking into assignments of the form x, y = generator
- as the argument to some builtin functions such as min/max/sorted
Also catch a few creeping cases of new code added using older styles.
This does not convert the build side, or remove any of the checking it
does. We still need that for other callers of custom target. What we'll
do for those is add an internal interface that defaults things, then
we'll be able to have those callers do their own validation, and the
CustomTarget validation machinary can be removed.
Fixes#9096
In the comparison methods of Target. There are several problems with the
old implementation:
1. It's not idiomatic
2. It can match on things that It shouldn't (like a Compiler, which has
a `get_id() -> str` method, but not one that we should compare with
Targets
3. It confuses mypy, which doesn't handle hasattr
It would probably be better if CommandBase had an initializer so it
could set the depend_files and dependencies attributes itself, but this
will make mypy happier.
This should be done in all cases of language_stdlib_only_link_flags, but
I don't have access to all of the compilers to test it.
This is required in cases where object files created by gfortran are
linked using another compiler with a differen default search path, such
as gfortran and clang together.
This patch adds a new meson built-in option for cython, allowing it to
target C++ instead of C as the intermediate language. This can, of
course, be done on a per-target basis using the `override_options`
keyword argument, or for the entire project in the project function.
There are some things in this patch that are less than ideal. One of
them is that we have to add compilers in the build layer, but there
isn't a better place to do it because of per target override_options.
There's also some design differences between Meson and setuptools, in
that Meson only allows options on a per-target rather than a per-file
granularity.
Fixes#9015
I ran into one of these from LGTM, and it would be nice if pylint could
warn me as part of my local development process instead of waiting for
the CI to tell me.
This really is more of a struct than a dict, as the types are disjoint
and they are internally handled, (ie, not from user input). This cleans
some things up, in addition I spotted a bug in the ModuleState where the
dict with the version and license is passed to a field that expects just
the version string.
We have a lot of these. Some of them are harmless, if unidiomatic, such
as `if (condition)`, others are potentially dangerous `assert(...)`, as
`assert(condtion)` works as expected, but `assert(condition, message)`
will result in an assertion that never triggers, as what you're actually
asserting is `bool(tuple[2])`, which will always be true.
Again, this is not complete and is just enough for backend.py. Again,
typing these is complicated massively by the layering violations in the
Target classes and the interpreter.
This is not complete, it's just enough for backend/backend.py. A more
completely typing would be more difficult, especially whithout
untangling the layering violation between the build targets and the
interpreter.
Dylan Baker
Eli Schwartz
Jussi Pakkanen
Xavier Claessens
Christian Clauss
Andres Freund
Daniel Mensinger
Filipe Laíns