It appears that LIB/LINK default to the host architecture if they can't
guess it from the first object. With the MSVC toolchain, resource files
are (usually) compiled to an arch-neutral .res format. Always
explicitly provide a '/MACHINE:' argument to avoid it guessing
incorrectly when cross-compiling.
The documentation states: "In other cases you can get multi-line
statements by ending the line with a \." but that seems to never have
worked.
Closes: #4720
Building a cross compiler (`build == host != target`) is not cross
compiling. As such, it doesn't make sense to handle it under
`is_cross_build`.
(N.B. Building a standard library for a cross compiler would require
cross compiling, but Meson has support to do such a thing as part of a
compiler build currently.)
Previously, the configuration worked fine, but the compiler raised an
error. Now, we explicitly check for the existence of files and print a
useful error message if they do not exist.
This seems to be related to deleting the current working directory.
Simply deleting all of the trees inside the build directory instead
seems to fix it. This only appears with some combination of generated
targets, running the test case against say "1 trivial" doesn't show the
bug.
See this mesa bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109071
It is possible that the subproject has been downloaded already, in that
case there is no reason to not use it. If the subproject has not been
downlaoded already it will fail do_subproject().
The code our projects care about verifying coverage for mostly lives in
the source_root with the exception of the generated source files in
build_root. This change cleans up the output so we don't have prefixed
paths on our source files anymore.
This would normally be exposed by the ExternalProgramHolder, but wasn't
due to the implementation of the PythonInstallation module. Because of
that I've duplicated the method so that we can add the FeatureNew
decorator.
Fixes#4070
Into a generic interpreter object. This isn't a module, it's an object
returned by a module, it also happens to be a special case of an
ExternalProgram, which is a normal interpreter object. Let's treat it
like one.
Since `_process_libs` appends the lib's dependencies this list already,
the final return value of `_process_libs` will end up after its
dependencies, which is the wrong way around. (The lib must come first,
then its dependencies)
The easiest solution is to simply pre-pend the return value of
`_process_libs` rather than appending it, so that its dependencies come
after the library itself.
Closes#4091.
Daniel Mensinger
mensinda
Jon Turney
Xavier Claessens
John Ericson
John Ericson
Jussi Pakkanen
guruDanny67
Nicolas Schneider
Dylan Baker
Thibault Saunier
William A. Kennington III
Niklas Haas