|
|
@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ d2 = dependency(d) |
|
|
|
d3 = (d == d2) |
|
|
|
d3 = (d == d2) |
|
|
|
d4 = d + 0 |
|
|
|
d4 = d + 0 |
|
|
|
d5 = d2 or true |
|
|
|
d5 = d2 or true |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
set_variable('d6', disabler()) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
has_not_changed = false |
|
|
|
has_not_changed = false |
|
|
|
if is_disabler(d) |
|
|
|
if is_disabler(d) |
|
|
@ -23,12 +24,14 @@ assert(is_disabler(d2), 'Function laundered disabler was not identified correctl |
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(d3), 'Disabler comparison should yield disabler.') |
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(d3), 'Disabler comparison should yield disabler.') |
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(d4), 'Disabler addition should yield disabler.') |
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(d4), 'Disabler addition should yield disabler.') |
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(d5), 'Disabler logic op should yield disabler.') |
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(d5), 'Disabler logic op should yield disabler.') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(d6), 'set_variable with a disabler should set variable to disabler.') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(d, 'Disabler did not cause this to be skipped.') |
|
|
|
assert(d, 'Disabler did not cause this to be skipped.') |
|
|
|
assert(d2, 'Function laundered disabler did not cause this to be skipped.') |
|
|
|
assert(d2, 'Function laundered disabler did not cause this to be skipped.') |
|
|
|
assert(d3, 'Disabler comparison should yield disabler and thus this would not be called.') |
|
|
|
assert(d3, 'Disabler comparison should yield disabler and thus this would not be called.') |
|
|
|
assert(d4, 'Disabler addition should yield disabler and thus this would not be called.') |
|
|
|
assert(d4, 'Disabler addition should yield disabler and thus this would not be called.') |
|
|
|
assert(d5, 'Disabler logic op should yield disabler and thus this would not be called.') |
|
|
|
assert(d5, 'Disabler logic op should yield disabler and thus this would not be called.') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(d6, 'set_variable with a disabler did not cause this to be skipped.') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
number = 0 |
|
|
|
number = 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -80,6 +83,31 @@ else |
|
|
|
endif |
|
|
|
endif |
|
|
|
assert(has_not_changed, 'App has changed.') |
|
|
|
assert(has_not_changed, 'App has changed.') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(not is_disabler(is_variable('d6')), 'is_variable should not return a disabler') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(is_variable('d6'), 'is_variable for a disabler should return true') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if_is_not_disabled = false |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if is_variable('d6') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if_is_not_disabled = true |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
else |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if_is_not_disabled = true |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
endif |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(if_is_not_disabled, 'Disabler in is_variable should not skip blocks') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_d = get_variable('d6') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(get_d), 'get_variable should yield a disabler') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_fallback_d = get_variable('nonexistant', disabler()) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(get_fallback_d), 'get_variable fallback should yield a disabler') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var_true = true |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_no_fallback_d = get_variable('var_true', disabler()) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(not is_disabler(get_no_fallback_d), 'get_variable should not fallback to disabler') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(get_no_fallback_d, 'get_variable should yield true') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(get_variable(disabler())), 'get_variable should yield a disabler') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(is_disabler(get_variable(disabler(), var_true)), 'get_variable should yield a disabler') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if_is_disabled = true |
|
|
|
if_is_disabled = true |
|
|
|
if disabler() |
|
|
|
if disabler() |
|
|
|
if_is_disabled = false |
|
|
|
if_is_disabled = false |
|
|
|