-Weverything is not a good match for behavior of other compilers at warning level 3. Align flags with what Meson passes to GCC instead. The warnings generated are often conflicting with what the user most probably wants. E.g.: * -Wc++98-compat does not make sense when building code that uses -std= to set a later standard. * -Wpadding warns when compiler pads classes and structs for better performance, probably something the user wants. These warnings, and maybe a couple of others, can of course be disabled by Meson with -Wno-* but it is not future proof (other warnings that makes sense to disable by default may be added which means Meson will probably have to pass different flags depending on the Clang version). It is also problematic to compile many system and library headers with -Weverything. For instance: * stdio.h and sigaction.h on Linux makes use of recursive macros (-Wdisabled-macro-expansion). * Many library headers make use of deprecated functionality (-Wdeprecated). * Many library (e.g. GTK+ and Qt) headers trigger Clang's Doxygen warnings (-Wdocumentation-unknown-command and -Wdocumentation). There are a couple of more warnings that need to be disabled when building files that use GTK+ and Qt. GTest is also problematic. Maybe it would make sense to add a higher level, where -Weverything would be passed to Clang, that aligns with the original intent of -Weverything. See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121029/067071.html . GCC does not have a similar flag though. I do not know about other compilers (MSVC etc).pull/401/head
parent
2cbe876f71
commit
a179d07fd1
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Loading…
Reference in new issue