Also updated the script that is used to generate tests.With fonttools,
we now do instancing first and then subsetting.
With different order of subsetting and instancing operations on the same
VF file, fonttools seems to generate 2 different font files with different
glyph set.
1. do subsetting and then instancing: this seems result in a larger glyph
set in the font file. Lookups are collected from both retained features
and all possible alternate featurevariations, this leads to a larger
glyph set after glyph closurei. And instancer doesn't redo glyph
closure, it does lookups pruning only.
2. do instancing and then subsetting: lookups are collected from
features that are replaced already and possible alternate feature
variations
Most of time the files are identical, so instead of comparing the TTX
dump we can check sha256 hashes of the files first and if they match, we
don’t have to check the TTX dumps at all, making the subset tests orders
of magnitude faster.
time meson test --suite=subset down from:
real 0m19.418s
user 0m38.171s
sys 0m3.587s
to:
real 0m3.102s
user 0m8.622s
sys 0m1.701s
The expected files have been replaced by hb-subset output so they are
bit-identical where FontTools output might not.
The generate-expected-outputs.py now compares the hb-subset output with
fontttols subset and errors of they don’t match.
Speed-up subset tests by saving TTX dump of expected output instead of
generating it each time the tests are run.
Cuts down meson test --suite=subset on my system from:
real 0m38.977s
user 1m12.024s
sys 0m10.547s
to:
real 0m22.291s
user 0m44.548s
sys 0m9.221s
Part of https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/3089
Currently hb-subset always desubroutinizes CFF fonts.
Note that even with this option fonttools won't generate the expected subset CFF fonts. They were manually created & tweaked to match hb-subset output.
Garret Rieger
Qunxin Liu
Khaled Hosny
Khaled Hosny
Ebrahim Byagowi
ckitagawa
Michiharu Ariza
cclauss