parent
9aa865dcc6
commit
3a27e8fb97
2 changed files with 371 additions and 2 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,368 @@ |
||||
<chapter id="shaping-concepts"> |
||||
<title>Shaping concepts</title> |
||||
<section id="text-shaping-concepts"> |
||||
<title>Text shaping</title> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Text shaping is the process of transforming a sequence of Unicode |
||||
codepoints that represent individual characters (letters, |
||||
diacritics, tone marks, numbers, symbols, etc.) into the |
||||
orthographically and linguistically correct two-dimensional layout |
||||
of glyph shapes taken from a specified font. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
For some writing systems (or <emphasis>scripts</emphasis>) and |
||||
languages, the process is simple, requiring the shaper to do |
||||
little more than advance the horizontal position forward by the |
||||
correct amount for each successive glyph. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
But, for <emphasis>complex scripts</emphasis>, any combination of |
||||
several shaping operations may be required, and the rules for how |
||||
and when they are applied vary from script to script. HarfBuzz and |
||||
other shaping engines implement these rules. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The exact rules and necessary operations for a particular script |
||||
constitute a shaping <emphasis>model</emphasis>. OpenType |
||||
specifies a set of shaping models that covers all of |
||||
Unicode. Other shaping models are available, however, including |
||||
Graphite and Apple Advanced Typography (AAT). |
||||
</para> |
||||
</section> |
||||
|
||||
<section id="complex-scripts"> |
||||
<title>Complex scripts</title> |
||||
<para> |
||||
In text-shaping terminology, scripts are generally classified as |
||||
either <emphasis>complex</emphasis> or <emphasis>non-complex</emphasis>. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Complex scripts are those for which transforming the input |
||||
sequence into the final layout requires some combination of |
||||
operations—such as context-dependent substitutions, |
||||
context-dependent mark positioning, glyph-to-glyph joining, |
||||
glyph reordering, or glyph stacking. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
In some complex scripts, the shaping rules require that a text |
||||
run be divided into syllables before the operations can be |
||||
applied. Other complex scripts may apply shaping operations over |
||||
entire words or over the entire text run, with no subdivision |
||||
required. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Non-complex scripts, by definition, do not require these |
||||
operations. However, correctly shaping a text run in a |
||||
non-complex script may still involve Unicode normalization, |
||||
ligature substitutions, mark positioning, kerning, and applying |
||||
other font features. The key difference is that a text run in a |
||||
non-complex script can be processed sequentially and in the same |
||||
order as the input sequence of Unicode codepoints, without |
||||
requiring an analysis stage. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</section> |
||||
|
||||
<section id="shaping-operations"> |
||||
<title>Shaping operations</title> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Shaping a complex-script text run involves transforming the |
||||
input sequence of Unicode codepoints with some combination of |
||||
operations that is specified in the shaping model for the |
||||
script. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The specific conditions that trigger a given operation for a |
||||
text run varies from script to script, as do the order that the |
||||
operations are performed in and which codepoints are |
||||
affected. However, the same general set of shaping operations is |
||||
common to all of the complex-script shaping models. |
||||
</para> |
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist> |
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
A <emphasis>reordering</emphasis> operation moves a glyph |
||||
from its original ("logical") position in the sequence to |
||||
some other ("visual") position. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The shaping model for a given complex script might involve |
||||
more than one reordering step. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
A <emphasis>joining</emphasis> operation replaces a glyph |
||||
with an alternate form that is designed to connect with one |
||||
or more of the adjacent glyphs in the sequence. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
A contextual <emphasis>substitution</emphasis> operation |
||||
replaces either a single glyph or a subsequence of several |
||||
glyphs with an alternate glyph. This substitution is |
||||
performed when the original glyph or subsequence of glyphs |
||||
occurs in a specified position with respect to the |
||||
surrounding sequence. For example, one substitution might be |
||||
performed only when the target glyph is the first glyph in |
||||
the sequence, while another substitution is performed only |
||||
when a different target glyph occurs immediately after a |
||||
particular string pattern. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The shaping model for a given complex script might involve |
||||
multiple contextual-substitution operations, each applying |
||||
to different target glyphs and patterns, and which are |
||||
performed in separate steps. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
A contextual <emphasis>positioning</emphasis> operation |
||||
moves the horizontal and/or vertical position of a |
||||
glyph. This positioning move is performed when the glyph |
||||
occurs in a specified position with respect to the |
||||
surrounding sequence. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Many contextual positioning operations are used to place |
||||
<emphasis>mark</emphasis> glyphs (such as diacritics, vowel |
||||
signs, and tone markers) with respect to |
||||
<emphasis>base</emphasis> glyphs. However, some complex |
||||
scripts may use contextual positioning operations to |
||||
correctly place base glyphs as well, such as |
||||
when the script uses <emphasis>stacking</emphasis> characters. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist> |
||||
</section> |
||||
|
||||
<section id="unicode-character-categories"> |
||||
<title>Unicode character categories</title> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Shaping models are typically specified with respect to how |
||||
scripts are defined in the Unicode standard. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Every codepoint in the Unicode Character Database (UCD) is |
||||
assigned a <emphasis>Unicode General Category</emphasis> (UGC), |
||||
which provides the most fundamental information about the |
||||
codepoint: whether the codepoint represents a |
||||
<emphasis>Letter</emphasis>, a <emphasis>Mark</emphasis>, a |
||||
<emphasis>Number</emphasis>, <emphasis>Punctuation</emphasis>, a |
||||
<emphasis>Symbol</emphasis>, a <emphasis>Separator</emphasis>, |
||||
or something else (<emphasis>Other</emphasis>). |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
These UGC properties are "Major" categories. Each codepoint is |
||||
further assigned to a "minor" category within its Major |
||||
category, such as "Letter, uppercase" (<literal>Lu</literal>) or |
||||
"Letter, modifier" (<literal>Lm</literal>). |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Shaping models are concerned primarily with Letter and Mark |
||||
codepoints. The minor categories of Mark codepoints are |
||||
particularly important for shaping. Marks can be nonspacing |
||||
(<literal>Mn</literal>), spacing combining |
||||
(<literal>Mc</literal>), or enclosing (<literal>Me</literal>). |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
In addition to the UGC property, codepoints in the Indic and |
||||
Southeast Asian scripts are also assigned |
||||
<emphasis>Unicode Indic Syllabic Category</emphasis> (UISC) and |
||||
<emphasis>Unicode Indic Positional Category</emphasis> (UIPC) |
||||
property that provides more detailed information needed for |
||||
shaping. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The UISC property sub-categorizes Letters and Marks according to |
||||
common script-shaping behaviors. For example, UISC distinguishes |
||||
between consonant letters, vowel letters, and vowel marks. The |
||||
UIPC property sub-categorizes Mark codepoints by the visual |
||||
position that they occupy (above, below, right, left, or in |
||||
multiple positions). |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Some complex scripts require that the text run be split into |
||||
syllables, and what constitutes a valid syllable in these |
||||
scripts is specified in regular expressions of the Letter and |
||||
Mark codepoints that take the UISC and UIPC properties into account. |
||||
</para> |
||||
|
||||
</section> |
||||
|
||||
<section id="text-runs"> |
||||
<title>Text runs</title> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Real-world text usually contains codepoints from a mixture of |
||||
different Unicode scripts (including punctuation, numbers, symbols, |
||||
white-space characters, and other codepoints that do not belong |
||||
to any script). Real-world text may also be marked up with |
||||
formatting that changes font properties (including the font, |
||||
font style, and font size). |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
For shaping purposes, all real-world text streams must be first |
||||
segmented into runs that have a uniform set of properties. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
In particular, shaping models always assume that every codepoint |
||||
in a text run has the same <emphasis>direction</emphasis>, |
||||
<emphasis>script</emphasis> tag, and |
||||
<emphasis>language</emphasis> tag. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</section> |
||||
|
||||
<section id="opentype-shaping-models"> |
||||
<title>OpenType shaping models</title> |
||||
<para> |
||||
OpenType provides shaping models for the following scripts: |
||||
</para> |
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist> |
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>default</emphasis> shaping model handles all |
||||
non-complex scripts, and may also be used as a fallback for |
||||
handling unrecognized scripts. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Indic</emphasis> shaping model handles the Indic |
||||
scripts Bengali, Devanagari, Gujarati, Gurmukhi, Kannada, |
||||
Malayalam, Oriya, Tamil, Telugu, and Sinhala. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The Indic shaping model was revised significantly in |
||||
2005. To denote the change, a new set of <emphasis>script |
||||
tags</emphasis> was assigned for Bengali, Devanagari, |
||||
Gujarati, Gurmukhi, Kannada, Malayalam, Oriya, Tamil, and |
||||
Telugu. For the sake of clarity, the term "Indic2" is |
||||
sometimes used to refer to the current, revised shaping |
||||
model. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Arabic</emphasis> shaping model supports |
||||
Arabic, Mongolian, N'Ko, Syriac, and several other connected |
||||
or cursive scripts. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Thai/Lao</emphasis> shaping model supports |
||||
the Thai and Lao scripts. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Khmer</emphasis> shaping model supports the |
||||
Khmer script. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Myanmar</emphasis> shaping model supports the |
||||
Myanmar (or Burmese) script. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Tibetan</emphasis> shaping model supports the |
||||
Tibetan script. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Hangul</emphasis> shaping model supports the |
||||
Hangul script. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Hebrew</emphasis> shaping model supports the |
||||
Hebrew script. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
The <emphasis>Universal Shaping Engine</emphasis> (USE) |
||||
shaping model supports complex scripts not covered by one of |
||||
the above, script-specific shaping models, including |
||||
Javanese, Balinese, Buginese, Batak, Chakma, Lepcha, Modi, |
||||
Phags-pa, Tagalog, Siddham, Sundanese, Tai Le, Tai Tham, Tai |
||||
Viet, and many others. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
<listitem> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Text runs that do not fall under one of the above shaping |
||||
models may still require processing by a shaping engine. Of |
||||
particular note is <emphasis>Emoji</emphasis> shaping, which |
||||
may involve variation-selector sequences and glyph |
||||
substitution. Emoji shaping is handled by the default |
||||
shaping model. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</listitem> |
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist> |
||||
|
||||
</section> |
||||
|
||||
<section id="graphite-shaping"> |
||||
<title>Graphite shaping</title> |
||||
<para> |
||||
In contrast to OpenType shaping, Graphite shaping does not |
||||
specify a predefined set of shaping models or a set of supported |
||||
scripts. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Instead, each Graphite font contains a complete set of rules that |
||||
implement the required shaping model for the intended |
||||
script. These rules include finite-state machines to match |
||||
sequences of codepoints to the shaping operations to perform. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Graphite shaping can perform the same shaping operations used in |
||||
OpenType shaping, as well as other functions that have not been |
||||
defined for OpenType shaping. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</section> |
||||
|
||||
<section id="aat-shaping"> |
||||
<title>AAT shaping</title> |
||||
<para> |
||||
In contrast to OpenType shaping, AAT shaping does not specify a |
||||
predefined set of shaping models or a set of supported scripts. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Instead, each AAT font includes a complete set of rules that |
||||
implement the desired shaping model for the intended |
||||
script. These rules include finite-state machines to match glyph |
||||
sequences and the shaping operations to perform. |
||||
</para> |
||||
<para> |
||||
Notably, AAT shaping rules are expressed for glyphs in the font, |
||||
not for Unicode codepoints. AAT shaping can perform the same |
||||
shaping operations used in OpenType shaping, as well as other |
||||
functions that have not been defined for OpenType shaping. |
||||
</para> |
||||
</section> |
||||
</chapter> |
Loading…
Reference in new issue