This new directory combines code from the following locations:
- src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/resolver
- src/core/lib/resolver
Closes#35804
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35804 from markdroth:client_channel_resolver_reorg2 30660e6b00
PiperOrigin-RevId: 604665835
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This is a big rewrite of global config.
It does a few things, all somewhat intertwined:
1. centralize the list of configuration we have to a yaml file that can
be parsed, and code generated from it
2. add an initialization and a reset stage so that config vars can be
centrally accessed very quickly without the need for caching them
3. makes the syntax more C++ like (less macros!)
4. (optionally) adds absl flags to the OSS build
This first round of changes is intended to keep the system where it is
without major changes. We pick up absl flags to match internal code and
remove one point of deviation - but importantly continue to read from
the environment variables. In doing so we don't force absl flags on our
customers - it's possible to configure grpc without the flags - but
instead allow users that do use absl flags to configure grpc using that
mechanism. Importantly this lets internal customers configure grpc the
same everywhere.
Future changes along this path will be two-fold:
1. Move documentation generation into the code generation step, so that
within the source of truth yaml file we can find all documentation and
data about a configuration knob - eliminating the chance of forgetting
to document something in all the right places.
2. Provide fuzzing over configurations. Currently most config variables
get stashed in static constants across the codebase. To fuzz over these
we'd need a way to reset those cached values between fuzzing rounds,
something that is terrifically difficult right now, but with these
changes should simply be a reset on `ConfigVars`.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
* service config API: use absl::Status instead of grpc_error
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* add missing build deps
* attempt to work around build breakage on older compilers
* trying the work-around in more spots
* more work-arounds
* more workarounds
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* work around another compiler problem
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
Co-authored-by: markdroth <markdroth@users.noreply.github.com>
* Refactor end2end tests to exercise each EventEngine
* fix incorrect bazel_only exclusions
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* microbenchmark fix
* sanitize, fix iOS flub
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* iOS fix
* reviewer feedback
* first pass at excluding EventEngine test expansion
Also caught a few cases where we should not test pollers, but should
test all engines. And two cases where we likely shouldn't be testing
either product.
* end2end fuzzers to be fuzzed differently via EventEngine.
* sanitize
* reviewer feedback
* remove misleading comment
* reviewer feedback: comments
* EE test_init needs to play with our build system
* fix golden file test runner
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
* Initial structure for RLS
* Adding and building the proto to parse the Any proto for the plugins
* re-org
* Parsing the plugin
* Parsing more into json
* Parsed proto to json
* small cleanup
* Adding prefix
* Added new rls_experimental policy
* build files
* Fixing according to code review comments
* code review comments
* Adding sym changes
* adding action name check
* fixing code review comments.
* fixing unused var error
* clean up
* fixing code review comments
* fixing code review comments
* fixing according to code review comments.
* Remove unnecessary include
* small fix
* generate more, hard-code less
* Moving to using absl::variant
* absl::string_view and absl::variant of vector of std::string are not
playing nice together.
* fixed variant
* Using absl::variant now
* Checkint used plugins
* Refactor Parsing code and separating out Parsing of the plugin
* Fixing code review comments
* code review comments
* fixing code review comments.
* Addressing code review comments
* First end-to-end test
* generated build files
* commit generated files via tools/codegen/core/gen_upb_api.sh
* Fixing rls policy parsing tests
* Restore checks for the test server
* Refactor rls_server
* added keys to rls request
* fixing small logic error
* Complete the test using all the keys
* Separating out RLS test and rls_server thread
* sanity errors
* generated build files
* Complete the rest of the tests and sanity cleanup
* fixing code review comments: using upb_JsonEncode now!
* fixing code review comments
* fixing code review comments
* Fixing code review comments
* misisng fix
* simplifying tests
* simplify tests 2
* Linking in the correct proto for rls_config
* restore metadata check
* Add disable test
* Fixing RLS test and removing environment var that is no longer necessary
* Fixing "Wrong type" type of tests after json parsing change to accept
STRING for number
* adding json_encode.h/c to src/upb/gen_build_yaml.py and generate
necessary files.
* Fixing un-used var error
* fixing sanity errors
* Fixing the upb encoding buffer
* Fixing code review comments.
* Adding nack test for unkonwn plugin proto
* Last bit of code review comments
* fixing unused variable
Based on a handful of https://abseil.io/tips, it's generally advised to
only fully-qualify namespaces when in a `using` statement, or when it's
otherwise required for compilation. In all other cases, the general
recommendation is to not fully-qualify.
This change fixes most `grpc.*` namespace uses. There are potential
challenges in trying to make blanket changes to non-gRPC namespace uses,
such as `::testing`, since there is also a `grpc::testing` namespace.
Based on a handful of https://abseil.io/tips, it's generally advised to
only fully-qualify namespaces when in a `using` statement, or when it's
otherwise required for compilation. In all other cases, the general
recommendation is to not fully-qualify.
This change fixes most `grpc.*` namespace uses. There are potential
challenges in trying to make blanket changes to non-gRPC namespace uses,
such as `::testing`, since there is also a `grpc::testing` namespace.