[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging - gpr_log
In this CL we are migrating from gRPCs own gpr logging mechanism to absl logging mechanism. The intention is to deprecate gpr_log in the future.
We have the following mapping
1. gpr_log(GPR_INFO,...) -> LOG(INFO)
2. gpr_log(GPR_ERROR,...) -> LOG(ERROR)
3. gpr_log(GPR_DEBUG,...) -> VLOG(2)
Reviewers need to check :
1. If the above mapping is correct.
2. The content of the log is as before.
gpr_log format strings did not use string_view or std::string . absl LOG accepts these. So there will be some elimination of string_view and std::string related conversions. This is expected.
Closes#36608
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36608 from tanvi-jagtap:regex_test_core_misc e6b9481dac
PiperOrigin-RevId: 634246311
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging - BUILD
In this CL we are just editing the build and bzl files to add dependencies.
This is done to prevent merge conflict and constantly having to re-make the make files using generate_projects.sh for each set of changes.
Closes#36606
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36606 from tanvi-jagtap:build_test_core_tsi_and_misc 708a724c46
PiperOrigin-RevId: 633518709
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
These changes have been made using string replacement and regex.
Will not be replacing all instances of CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only ones which are doable using very simple regex with least chance of failure will be replaced.
Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36442
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36442 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_xds_tsi_address_utils 5c10771ac1
PiperOrigin-RevId: 628081981
The logic is straightforward: attempt to read the
`GRPC_ALTS_MAX_CONCURRENT_HANDSHAKES` environment variable and, if it
set to an integer, instantiate the handshake queues based on this
integer.
Based on go/grpc-alts-concurrent-handshake-cap.
This check only works if all handshake RPCs have an OK status, and it's
racey e.g. if the client is cancelling handshake RPCs (being when an RPC
is cancelled, termination of the RPC at the client is asynchronous from
termination at the server, so the client can resume the queue before the
server RPC completes).
* weighted_target and RLS: delegate to child picker on error
* security handshaker: include security connector type in error message
* update test
* fix sanity
* fix crash
* TSI: return handshaker error message for inclusion in RPC failure status
* remove TODO
* remove unnecessary code
* fix test
* fix tsan bug
* document parameter
* Refactor end2end tests to exercise each EventEngine
* fix incorrect bazel_only exclusions
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* microbenchmark fix
* sanitize, fix iOS flub
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* iOS fix
* reviewer feedback
* first pass at excluding EventEngine test expansion
Also caught a few cases where we should not test pollers, but should
test all engines. And two cases where we likely shouldn't be testing
either product.
* end2end fuzzers to be fuzzed differently via EventEngine.
* sanitize
* reviewer feedback
* remove misleading comment
* reviewer feedback: comments
* EE test_init needs to play with our build system
* fix golden file test runner
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
Tanvi Jagtap
Mark D. Roth
AJ Heller
Craig Tiller
ericsalo
Matthew Stevenson
apolcyn
Peter Foley
Yijie Ma
Cheng-Yu Chung
Esun Kim
yihuaz
Ashitha Santhosh
Jan Tattermusch
yang-g