<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Earlier, we were simply using a 64 bit random number, but the spec
actually calls for UUIDv4.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This allows us to replace `absl::optional<TaskHandle>` with checks
against the invalid handle.
This PR also replaces the differently-named invalid handle instances
with a uniform way of accessing static invalid instances across all
handle types, which aids a bit in testing.
Add an event manager that spawns threads just as much as it possibly
can... to expose TSAN to the myriad thread ordering problems in our code
base.
Next steps for this will be to add a new test mode for tsan + thready
event engine + a few other doodads to increase threads in the system
(party.cc in particular has a good place for a hook).
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
(part of removing support for VS2017)
Also see https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/32649
Also see https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/32615
The switch to grpc-win2019 windows workers has already happened:
(cl/517400022).
Once this PR lands, I'll backport to 1.53.x branch as well (since that
release removes the VS2017 support).
This PR is a small code change with a lot of new test data.
[In OpenSSL, there are two flags that configure CRL checks. Coping
relevant
section:](https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_depth.html)
> - X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK enables CRL checking for the certificate chain
leaf certificate. An error occurs if a suitable CRL cannot be found.
> - X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL enables CRL checking for the entire
certificate chain.
We currently only set `X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK`, so we will only ever
check if the leaf certificate is revoked. We should check the whole
chain. I am open to making this a user configuration if we want to do it
that way, but we certainly need to be able to check the whole chain.
So, this PR contains the small code change in
`ssl_transport_security.cc` to use the `X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL` flag.
Then the rest of the changes are in tests. I've added all the necessary
files to have a chain built that looks as follows
`Root CA -> Revoked Intermediate CA -> Leaf Certificate`, and added a
test for this case as well.
You can verify that on master this new test will fail (i.e. the
handshake will succeed even though the intermediate CA is revoked) by
checking out this branch, running `git checkout master --
./src/core/tsi/ssl_transport_security.cc`, then running the test.
I also slightly reorganized test/core/tsi/test_creds/ so that the CRLs
are in their own directory, which is the way our API intends to accept
CRLs.
Fixing TSAN data races of the kind -
https://source.cloud.google.com/results/invocations/c3f02253-0d0b-44e6-917d-07e4bc0d3d62/targets/%2F%2Ftest%2Fcpp%2Fperformance:writes_per_rpc_test@poller%3Dpoll/log
I think the original issue was the non-atomic load in
writes_per_rpc_test.cc but also making the change to use barriers
instead of relaxed atomics (probably unimportant but I'll prefer safety
in the absence of otherwise comments).
Could probably also use std::atomic but feeling a bit lazy to make the
changes throughout.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This PR adds the view `grpc.io/client/api_latency` for GCP Observability
which aims to collect the end-to-end time taken by a call.
Changes made to support this -
1) A global interceptor factory registration is created for stats
plugins.
2) OpenCensus plugin now provides a new interceptor that's responsible
for collecting the new latency.
3) Gcp Observability registers this plugin.
4) A new OpenCensus measurement and view is created for api latency.
Note that this is internal as of now, since it's not clear if it should
be exposed as public experimental API. Leaving that decision for the
future.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This PR adds annotations to client attempt spans and server spans on
messages of the form -
* `Send message: 1026 bytes`
* `Send compressed message: 31 bytes` (if message was compressed)
* `Received message: 31 bytes`
* `Received decompressed message: 1026 bytes` (if message needed to be
decompressed)
Note that the compressed and decompressed annotations are not present if
compression/decompression was not performed.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Initial PR to establish a bazel dependency on
https://github.com/google/fuzztest, with which I'm planning on basing a
hardening program.
Casting a relatively wide net with reviewers: I'm genuinely interested
in feedback building up the docs, and general ergonomics of this change.
I've located relevant files in the `fuzztest/...` directory. The tests
only build with the `--config fuzztest` bazel argument for now (because
of needing C++17), so locating them separately keeps `bazel test
test/...` working as it does today. In a few years time, when we adopt
C++17, we'll be able to rationalize the test directories a little bit.
We'll need to add some kokoro jobs (maybe with this PR?) to execute the
relevant tests.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix incompatibilities identified when running adhoc runs on the new
custom win2019 image.
After merging this, it should be possible to switch to the new image
without breaking any tests.
- for most fixes I added a comment that explains why they're necessary.
- the new image won't have VS2015 installed, so I'm switching the protoc
artifact build to VS2017
This PR will need to be backported to older release branches to ensure
the windows tests continue working on those branches as well (IMHO I
haven't made any changes that would be difficult to backport and I tried
to keeps the diff as small as possible to avoid issues when
backporting).
After we switch to the new image (and all the windows tests are green),
we can incrementally move the builds that are still using VS2017 to
VS2019.
This is a big rewrite of global config.
It does a few things, all somewhat intertwined:
1. centralize the list of configuration we have to a yaml file that can
be parsed, and code generated from it
2. add an initialization and a reset stage so that config vars can be
centrally accessed very quickly without the need for caching them
3. makes the syntax more C++ like (less macros!)
4. (optionally) adds absl flags to the OSS build
This first round of changes is intended to keep the system where it is
without major changes. We pick up absl flags to match internal code and
remove one point of deviation - but importantly continue to read from
the environment variables. In doing so we don't force absl flags on our
customers - it's possible to configure grpc without the flags - but
instead allow users that do use absl flags to configure grpc using that
mechanism. Importantly this lets internal customers configure grpc the
same everywhere.
Future changes along this path will be two-fold:
1. Move documentation generation into the code generation step, so that
within the source of truth yaml file we can find all documentation and
data about a configuration knob - eliminating the chance of forgetting
to document something in all the right places.
2. Provide fuzzing over configurations. Currently most config variables
get stashed in static constants across the codebase. To fuzz over these
we'd need a way to reset those cached values between fuzzing rounds,
something that is terrifically difficult right now, but with these
changes should simply be a reset on `ConfigVars`.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Looking for something else I made some test additions, code tweaks to
make `Poll<>` better.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
We currently take named metrics recorded per-request only. Instead we
should merge field-wise.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
1. Make channel creation lazy. This allows test cases to update the
configuration before the connection is made.
2. Pass load reports tracker when creating the policy. This way other
test cases do not see any changes to ChannelArguments.
Using grpc_core::CoreConfiguration::RunWithSpecialConfiguration was
considered but did not work as it removes other builders setup prior to
starting the test cases.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This change mostly aims to get OpenCensus to use the new
ServerCallTracer interface. Note that the interfaces nor the code are in
their final states. There are a bunch of moving pieces, but I thought
this might be a nice mid-step to check-in and make sure that our
internal traces can also work with these changes.
Overall changes -
1) call_tracer.h shows what the hierarchy of new call tracer interfaces
looks like. Open to renaming suggestions.
2) Moved most of the common interface between `CallAttemptTracer` and
`ServerCallTracer` into a common `CallTracerInterface`. We should be
able to eventually move `RecordReceivedTrailingMetadata` and `RecordEnd`
as well to these common interfaces, but it requires some additional
work.
3) The compression filter is now responsible for recording the recv and
send messages for both the subchannel call and the server, and adds in
ability to record compressed and decompressed messages as well.
4) The OpenCensus server filter now uses the new `ServerCallTracer`
interface, and so doesn't need to be a filter anymore.
5) A new ServerCallTracerFilter was added. Ideally, we should be able to
move it to the current connected filter, but it is in a bit of an
interesting state right now, so I would prefer making those changes in a
separate PR with Craig's eyes on it.
6) A new context element `GRPC_CONTEXT_CALL_TRACER_ANNOTATION_INTERFACE`
was created that replaces the old `GRPC_CONTEXT_CALL_TRACER`, and the
new `GRPC_CONTEXT_CALL_TRACER` is mainly to pass the `CallAttemptTracer`
down the stack. This should go away in the new promise-based world.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
- - -
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg"
height="34" align="absmiddle"
alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/grpc/grpc/32618)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
It is reported in https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/32356 that there
is a race on vptr for `UnimplementedAsyncRequest` which would cause
crashes for multi-threaded server if clients send unimplemented RPC
request to the server.
The cause is that the server requests a call for
`UnimplementedAsyncRequest` in its base class `GenericAsyncRequest` when
the `vptr` still points to the base class's `vtable`. If the call went
in and another server thread picks up the tag before the `vptr` points
back to the derived class's `vtable`, it would call the wrong virtual
function and also this is a data race. This fix makes the request of the
call inside the derived class's constructor.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
First step in the modernization of our RBE stack (see
go/rbe-tech-debt-notes).
- Get rid of the deprecated rbe_autoconfig and start using
[rbe_configs_gen](https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel-toolchains#rbe_configs_gen---cli-tool-to-generate-configs)
+ check in the generated toolchain configs.
- Switch from marketplace.gcr.io/google/rbe-ubuntu16-04 to
marketplace.gcr.io/google/rbe-ubuntu18-04 (this image is still not owned
by us, but at least it's newer and demonstrates how a switch to a newer
docker image is done).
- provide script for generating the linux RBE toolchain configs.
- cleanup RBE configuration in the bazelrc files used for remote build
This check only works if all handshake RPCs have an OK status, and it's
racey e.g. if the client is cancelling handshake RPCs (being when an RPC
is cancelled, termination of the RPC at the client is asynchronous from
termination at the server, so the client can resume the queue before the
server RPC completes).
With iomgr, this test is effectively rate limited by ExecCtx and the
single thread running pollset_work, which results in thousands of tiny
writes happening before every read. A small set of _synchronous_ 8k
reads then dominate the read-side of the test. This is an efficient
balance.
With the Windows EventEngine, the fully asynchronous, multi-threaded
reads and writes end up alternating roughly 1:1, meaning that a read
callback is executed for every tiny handful of bytes, tens of thousands
of times. Compared to the Posix EventEngine, without things like TCP_INQ
and/or recvmsg's timeout, I don't know of any great signal for how much
data can safely be received in a batch (e.g., we don't want to wait for
data that will never come, and we don't want to run callbacks for 2
bytes over and over again if we have KB in the pipe).
I believe the Windows EventEngine is WAI. I can significantly improve
this test performance by artificially slowing the reader down (adding a
>= 1ms sleep), but I believe that improves this use case to the
detriment of all others.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
To support TPC feature for BYOID (3PI), we need to remove the validation
the pattern of impersonation endpoints, sts endpoints and token info
endpoints since they are different in TPC regions.
A security review is already passed at b/261634871
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
PR #32215 added the verified root cert subject to the lower level
`tsi_peer`. This PR is a companion to that and completes the feature by
bubbling the information up to the `TsiCustomVerificationCheckRequest`
which is part of the user facing API for implementing custom
verification callbacks.
Discovered via `bazel test
--test_env=GRPC_EXPERIMENTS=event_engine_client
//test/core/iomgr:endpoint_pair_test`. CI experiments can be enabled
generally on Windows once a few fixes and improvements are completed.
There are potentially surprising deployment bugs that can cause `EMFILE`
to be hit. For example, file descriptor limits can be easily reached if
- the round robin LB policy is used
- the load balancer hands out an assignment with a lot of backends
- using debian's default 1024 file descriptor limit.
To make such problems more apparent, we can pay special attention to
this error and log ERROR when it happens.
Related: b/265199104
Third try for #32466.
This adds an interop client / server for GCP Observability integration
testing.
Everything is new here with no refactor. Plan is to get this in first
before trying to refactor out the flags.
Avoids some compilation problems on older MSVC's, opens the door for
some future optimizations.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Craig Tiller
Yash Tibrewal
AJ Heller
Jan Tattermusch
Gregory Cooke
Carl Lundin
Yousuk Seung
Eugene Ostroukhov
Mark D. Roth
Mike Kruskal
apolcyn
Yijie Ma
Jin
Stanley Cheung
