In certain situations the current flow control algorithm can result in
sending one flow control update write for every write sent (known
situation: rollout of promise based server calls with qps_test).
Fix things up so that the updates are only sent when truly needed, and
then fix the fallout (turns out our fuzzer had some bugs)
I've placed actual logic changes behind an experiment so that it can be
incrementally & safely rolled out.
Building out a new framing layer for chttp2.
The central idea here is to have the framing layer be solely responsible
for serialization of frames, and their deserialization - the framing
layer can reject frames that have invalid syntax - but the enacting of
what that frame means is left to a higher layer.
This class will become foundational for the promise conversion of chttp2
- by eliminating action from the parsing of frames we can reuse this
sensitive code.
Right now the new layer is inactive - there's a test that exercises it
relatively well, and not much more. In the next PRs I'll add an
experiments to enable using this layer or the existing code in the
writing and reading paths.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Need the ability to override server-side keepalive permit without calls
default without affecting client-side settings.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Why: Cleanup for chttp2_transport ahead of promise conversion - lots of
logic has become interleaved throughout chttp2, so some effort to
isolate logic out is warranted ahead of that conversion.
What: Split configuration and policy tracking for each of ping rate
throttling and abuse detection into their own modules. Add tests for
them.
Incidentally: Split channel args into their own header so that we can
split the policy stuff into separate build targets.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
In real services most of our time ends up in the `Read1()` function,
which populates one byte into the bit buffer.
Change this to read in as many as possible bytes at a time into that
buffer.
Additionally, generate all possible (to some depth) parser geometries,
and add a benchmark for them. Run that benchmark and select the best
geometry for decoding base64 strings (since this is the main use-case).
(gives about a 30% speed boost parsing base64 then huffman encoded
random binary strings)
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Most of the time parsing succeeds, and only rarely do we see an error.
This change reduces the parse memento size from 120 bytes to 56 bytes.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Along with an experiment this time
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This reverts commit e107ff5e99.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Noticed some inconsistencies in our keepalive configuration -
* Earlier, even if keepalive pings were disabled, we would be scheduling
keepalive pings at an interval of INT_MAX ms.
* We were not using `g_default_client_keepalive_permit_without_calls` /
`g_default_server_keepalive_permit_without_calls`. They are both false
by default but they can be overridden in
`grpc_chttp2_config_default_keepalive_args`.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
The PR also creates a separate BUILD target for:
- chttp2 context list
- iomgr buffer_list
- iomgr internal errqueue
This would allow the context list to be included as standalone
dependencies for EventEngine implementations.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
(hopefully last try)
Add new channel arg GRPC_ARG_ABSOLUTE_MAX_METADATA_SIZE as hard limit
for metadata. Change GRPC_ARG_MAX_METADATA_SIZE to be a soft limit.
Behavior is as follows:
Hard limit
(1) if hard limit is explicitly set, this will be used.
(2) if hard limit is not explicitly set, maximum of default and soft
limit * 1.25 (if soft limit is set) will be used.
Soft limit
(1) if soft limit is explicitly set, this will be used.
(2) if soft limit is not explicitly set, maximum of default and hard
limit * 0.8 (if hard limit is set) will be used.
Requests between soft and hard limit will be rejected randomly, requests
above hard limit will be rejected.
Previously we triggered a flow control update when `announced <
target/2`, but if `target==1` then we fail to send a flow control update
(announced is never less than 1/2==0) and break our forward progress
guarantees.
b/259780449 internally.
This is a big rewrite of global config.
It does a few things, all somewhat intertwined:
1. centralize the list of configuration we have to a yaml file that can
be parsed, and code generated from it
2. add an initialization and a reset stage so that config vars can be
centrally accessed very quickly without the need for caching them
3. makes the syntax more C++ like (less macros!)
4. (optionally) adds absl flags to the OSS build
This first round of changes is intended to keep the system where it is
without major changes. We pick up absl flags to match internal code and
remove one point of deviation - but importantly continue to read from
the environment variables. In doing so we don't force absl flags on our
customers - it's possible to configure grpc without the flags - but
instead allow users that do use absl flags to configure grpc using that
mechanism. Importantly this lets internal customers configure grpc the
same everywhere.
Future changes along this path will be two-fold:
1. Move documentation generation into the code generation step, so that
within the source of truth yaml file we can find all documentation and
data about a configuration knob - eliminating the chance of forgetting
to document something in all the right places.
2. Provide fuzzing over configurations. Currently most config variables
get stashed in static constants across the codebase. To fuzz over these
we'd need a way to reset those cached values between fuzzing rounds,
something that is terrifically difficult right now, but with these
changes should simply be a reset on `ConfigVars`.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Craig Tiller
Alisha Nanda
Yash Tibrewal
Esun Kim
Mark D. Roth
Vignesh Babu
Jan Tattermusch
Yijie Ma
Cheng-Yu Chung