[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging - gpr_log
In this CL we are migrating from gRPCs own gpr logging mechanism to absl logging mechanism. The intention is to deprecate gpr_log in the future.
We have the following mapping
1. gpr_log(GPR_INFO,...) -> LOG(INFO)
2. gpr_log(GPR_ERROR,...) -> LOG(ERROR)
3. gpr_log(GPR_DEBUG,...) -> VLOG(2)
Reviewers need to check :
1. If the above mapping is correct.
2. The content of the log is as before.
gpr_log format strings did not use string_view or std::string . absl LOG accepts these. So there will be some elimination of string_view and std::string related conversions. This is expected.
Closes#36550
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36550 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_test_cpp_e2e_xds d242076993
PiperOrigin-RevId: 632024853
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
Will not be replacing CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only a few - which fit into single - line regex will be changed. This would be small in number just to reduce the load later.
Replacing CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc could be done using Cider-V once these changes are submitted if we want to clean up later. Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36268
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36268 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_grpc_assert_end2end_xds d9d072c772
PiperOrigin-RevId: 623360481
Relands #34785, which was reverted in #34818.
The first commit is the revert. The second commit removes the gtest
dependency from the xds_server library, which should address the
testonly problem internally.
This should address one of the failures we're seeing in #34224.
The test failure is caused by the changes in timing triggering a race
condition. In the code at head, we delay sending out the subscription
for the first CDS watch until we've already seen the other two CDS
watches, because the previous send_message op has not yet completed, and
by the time it does, we've seen all 3 watches, so we can send a
subscription for all 3 at the same time. With the WorkSerializer change,
the send_message op is complete by the time we see the first CDS watch,
so we subscribe to only that resource, and then later add the other two.
The result is that we'll NACK twice with two different messages, the
first one including only the error about the first resource, and the
second one including all three.
I suspect this same race condition would have been triggered eventually
by the EventEngine migration anyway; the current test basically depends
on the single-thread timing of the iomgr approach. So I'm addressing it
by replacing the e2e test with a unit test that covers the same cases
without the timing issue.
This bug occurred when the same xDS server was configured twice in the
same bootstrap config, once in an authority and again as the top-level
server. In that case, we were incorrectly failing to de-dup them and
were creating a separate channel for the LRS stream than the one that
already existed for the ADS stream. We fix this by canonicalizing the
server keys the same way in both cases.
As a separate follow-up item, I will work on trying to find a better way
to key these maps that does not suffer from this kind of fragility.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
* Fix XdsClient for multiple watchers on the same resource
* xds_end2end_test: Don't use XdsCredentials for XdsRbacNackTests
* Use separate response states for EDS and RDS resources
* Reviewer comments
* Reviewer comments
* Reviewer comments
* Remove blank link
* Reviewer comments
Tanvi Jagtap
Mark D. Roth
Eugene Ostroukhov
Yousuk Seung
Craig Tiller
apolcyn
Yash Tibrewal