Change was created by the release automation script. See go/grpc-release.
Closes#36892
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36892 from XuanWang-Amos:bump_dev_version_202406112301 9b2898d716
PiperOrigin-RevId: 643027546
All TraceFlags are now configured in `src/core/lib/debug/trace_flags.yaml`. The format is:
```
my_flag:
default: false # the default value; default=false
description: Some Description
debug_only: false # debug_only flags only work in debug builds; default=false
internal: false # internal flags will not show up in documentation; default=false
```
To regenerate the trace flag source code, run `tools/codegen/core/gen_trace_flags.py` (requires mako). This script is also run when sanity checking.
This PR also adds two new features:
### Glob-based flag configuration
Trace flag configuration now supports `?` (single wildcard character) and `*` (one or more wildcard characters). For example, using `GRPC_TRACE='event_engine*'` will enable all flags that match that glob. It expands to:
* event_engine
* event_engine_client_channel_resolver
* event_engine_dns
* event_engine_endpoint
* event_engine_endpoint_data
* event_engine_poller
### A cleaner trace-logging macro in abseil logging format
If your goal is only to add log statements when the `fault_injection_filter` trace flag is enabled, you can use the macro:
```
GRPC_TRACE_LOG(fault_injection, INFO) << "Filtered:" << 42;
```
When the trace flag is enabled, the the log will show something like this:
```
I0000 00:00:1715733657.430042 16 file.cc:174] Filtered:42
```
----
Note: just like with the gpr_log to abseil logging conversion, the pre-existing trace logging usages can be replaced with the new tracing macro across multiple PRs.
Closes#36576
PiperOrigin-RevId: 641295215
Change was created by the release automation script. See go/grpc-release.
Closes#36544
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36544 from yashykt:bump_dev_version_202405061956 69ee5c869e
PiperOrigin-RevId: 631187829
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36333
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36333 from yijiem:bump_dev_version_202404101721 0a7cc5b4b7
PiperOrigin-RevId: 623878150
Change was created by the release automation script. See go/grpc-release.
Closes#35899
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35899 from eugeneo:bump_dev_version_202402131133 73950425c9
PiperOrigin-RevId: 606777850
Change was created by the release automation script. See go/grpc-release.
Closes#35580
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35580 from stanley-cheung:bump_dev_version_202401171835 b363888ca5
PiperOrigin-RevId: 599267642
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This adds a new channel argument `GRPC_ARG_DSCP` which allows users to
create classified gRPC streams with a
Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) marking on the IP frames.
The channel argument is handled on both clients and servers, but
currently only on posix based systems.
Fixes#17225
**Background**:
In addition to what is already described is #17225, when gRPC is used in
telco systems there is often a need to classify streams of importance.
There can be multiple hops between two endpoints (e.g. between 2 telecom
operators) and some streams that are more important than others (e.g.
emergency call related or similar). By marking the IP packets using DSCP
the aware routers can make a sound decision of the prioritization.
This PR propose to use DSCP as the configuration value since its common
for both IPv4/IPv6, an alternative would be to use a config name that
includes TOS and Traffic Class.
There might be more needed regarding documentation and end2end testing,
but there I need some advice.
**References**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2474https://www.iana.org/assignments/dscp-registry/dscp-registry.xhtml
<!--
Your pull request will be routed to the following person by default for
triaging.
If you know who should review your pull request, please remove the
mentioning below.
-->
@yashykt