This adds a new GKE benchmark job, which runs the set of "dashboard"
scenarios for every gRPC experiment configured in the script. Results
are published to BigQuery at
`e2e_benchmarks.ci_cxx_experiment_results_${N}core.${experiment}`
See https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33907 for the scenario config.
Scenarios for language `node` specify the server language as `node`
(instead of leaving it blank), so a flag must be added to
`--allow_server_language=node`.
Scenarios for language `node_purejs` differ in name and in scenario
settings, but otherwise run on identical clients and servers. This
change treats `node_purejs` as `node` for the purpose of generating load
test configurations.
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33699 incorrectly changed the legacy
builds to not just use the test driver from the master, but also to
build from it. This PR fixes the issue, and also updates the python job
to work use the driver from master.
follow up from #33590
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
We are seeing `g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program
cc1plus` on PHP distribtest builds. In case it's an OOM, let's try
reducing the build parallelism to see if it helps.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Makes the changes necessary to run the new PSM interop framework on
Ubuntu 22.04:
- Install dependencies via apt: `kubectl`,
`google-cloud-sdk-gke-gcloud-auth-plugin` (previously were
pre-provisioned or available as part of gcloud distribution)
- Use venv instead of pyenv
- Use python 3.10 instead of python3 .9
Other changes:
- Do not update gcloud components - the one provisioned is relatively
recent, and expected to be updated as new base images are released
- Unpin pip from `21.0.1`. Not sure if we're OK about using the latest
one `venv --upgrade-deps`, or if we should just pin it to something more
recent (currently it resolves to `pip 22.0.2` and `setuptools 68.0.0`)
ref b/274944592, cl/547690787
`cmake_ninja_vs2019` and `default` are using the same
`cmake_ninja_vs2019` so having two tests are waste so this is removing
`cmake_ninja_vs2019` leaving `default` which does `cmake_ninja_vs2019`.
This change can cut the space consumption by half and with 250GB disc,
- Pre-test: 267,770,322,944 bytes free
- Post-test: 134,499,295,232 bytes free
This test mode tries to create threads wherever it legally can to
maximize the chances of TSAN finding errors in our codebase.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Yash Tibrewal <yashkt@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Stanley Cheung <stanleycheung@google.com>
Co-authored-by: AJ Heller <hork@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Yijie Ma <yijiem.main@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: apolcyn <apolcyn@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Tattermusch <jtattermusch@google.com>
Resolve `TESTING_VERSION` to `dev-VERSION` when the job is initiated by
a user, and not the CI. Override this behavior with setting
`FORCE_TESTING_VERSION`.
This solves the problem with the manual job runs executed against a WIP
branch (f.e. a PR) overriding the tag of the CI-built image we use for
daily testing.
The `dev` and `dev-VERSION` "magic" values supported by the
`--testing_version` flag:
- `dev` and `dev-master` and treated as `master`: all
`config.version_gte` checks resolve to `True`.
- `dev-VERSION` is treated as `VERSION`: `dev-v1.55.x` is treated as
simply `v1.55.x`. We do this so that when manually running jobs for old
branches the feature skip check still works, and unsupported tests are
skipped.
This changes will take care of all langs/branches, no backports needed.
ref b/256845629
The job run time was creeping to the 2h timeout. Let's bump it to 3h.
Note that this is `master` branch, so it also includes the build time
every time we commit to grpc/grpc.
ref b/280784903
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Oops I missed important changes from
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/32712. And it turned out that there
are two problems that I couldn't fix at this point.
- Windows Bazel RBE Linker Error: This may be caused by how new Bazel 6
invokes build tools chain but it's not clear. I put workaround to use
Bazel 5 by using `OVERRIDE_BAZEL_VERSION=5.4.1`
- Rule `rules_pods` to fetch CronetFramework from CocoaPod has
incompatibility with sort of built-in apple toolchain.
(https://github.com/bazel-xcode/PodToBUILD/issues/232): I couldn't find
a workaround to fix this so I ended up disabling all tests depending
this target.
It already started hitting the limit resulting in continuous failure.
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/32603 is believed to contribute to
this time increase but let's bump it first and visit this issue later.
The very non-trivial upgrade of third_party/protobuf to 22.x
This PR strives to be as small as possible and many changes that were
compatible with protobuf 21.x and didn't have to be merged atomically
with the upgrade were already merged.
Due to the complexity of the upgrade, this PR wasn't created
automatically by a tool, but manually. Subsequent upgraded of
third_party/protobuf with our OSS release script should work again once
this change is merged.
This is best reviewed commit-by-commit, I tried to group changes in
logical areas.
Notable changes:
- the upgrade of third_party/protobuf submodule, the bazel protobuf
dependency itself
- upgrade of UPB dependency to 22.x (in the past, we used to always
upgrade upb to "main", but upb now has release branch as well). UPB
needs to be upgraded atomically with protobuf since there's a de-facto
circular dependency (new protobuf depends on new upb, which depends on
new protobuf for codegen).
- some protobuf and upb bazel rules are now aliases, so `
extract_metadata_from_bazel_xml.py` and `gen_upb_api_from_bazel_xml.py`
had to be modified to be able to follow aliases and reach the actual
aliased targets.
- some protobuf public headers were renamed, so especially
`src/compiler` needed to be updated to use the new headers.
- protobuf and upb now both depend on utf8_range project, so since we
bundle upb with grpc in some languages, we now have to bundle utf8_range
as well (hence changes in build for python, PHP, objC, cmake etc).
- protoc now depends on absl and utf8_range (previously protobuf had
absl dependency, but not for the codegen part), so python's
make_grpcio_tools.py required partial rewrite to be able to handle those
dependencies in the grpcio_tools build.
- many updates and fixes required for C++ distribtests (currently they
all pass, but we'll probably need to follow up, make protobuf's and
grpc's handling of dependencies more aligned and revisit the
distribtests)
- bunch of other changes mostly due to overhaul of protobuf's and upb's
internal build layout.
TODOs:
- [DONE] make sure IWYU and clang_tidy_code pass
- create a list of followups (e.g. work to reenable the few tests I had
to disable and to remove workaround I had to use)
- [DONE in cl/523706129] figure out problem(s) with internal import
---------
Co-authored-by: Craig Tiller <ctiller@google.com>
Fix incompatibilities identified when running adhoc runs on the new
custom win2019 image.
After merging this, it should be possible to switch to the new image
without breaking any tests.
- for most fixes I added a comment that explains why they're necessary.
- the new image won't have VS2015 installed, so I'm switching the protoc
artifact build to VS2017
This PR will need to be backported to older release branches to ensure
the windows tests continue working on those branches as well (IMHO I
haven't made any changes that would be difficult to backport and I tried
to keeps the diff as small as possible to avoid issues when
backporting).
After we switch to the new image (and all the windows tests are green),
we can incrementally move the builds that are still using VS2017 to
VS2019.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Make remaining objC jobs compatible with kokoro monterey workers and
prepare for boringssl upgrade.
The changes here are taken from https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/32357,
but they should be merged in a separate PR
(we need the changes to be able to upgrade to monterey anyway and
there's no reason to make the boringssl upgrade PR more complicated by
bundling more fixes into it).
I've checked that the grpc_basictests_objc_examples and
grpc_ios_binary_size are green if switched to monterey.
Unfortunately it's hard to make grpc_basictests_objc_examples pass on
both monterey and mojave, so I suggest merging this PR at the same time
as CL to upgrade the kokoro jobs to monterey.
- that way both PR and continuous runs will remain green
- older branches would need a backport anyway
---------
Co-authored-by: Hannah Shi <hannahshisfb@gmail.com>
PHP7 build is failing, removing from CI while investigating the failure.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->