[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging - gpr_log
In this CL we are migrating from gRPCs own gpr logging mechanism to absl logging mechanism. The intention is to deprecate gpr_log in the future.
We have the following mapping
1. gpr_log(GPR_INFO,...) -> LOG(INFO)
2. gpr_log(GPR_ERROR,...) -> LOG(ERROR)
3. gpr_log(GPR_DEBUG,...) -> VLOG(2)
Reviewers need to check :
1. If the above mapping is correct.
2. The content of the log is as before.
gpr_log format strings did not use string_view or std::string . absl LOG accepts these. So there will be some elimination of string_view and std::string related conversions. This is expected.
Closes#36678
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36678 from tanvi-jagtap:test_cpp_gpr_log 81b8f4179f
PiperOrigin-RevId: 636410944
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
Will not be replacing CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only a few - which fit into single - line regex will be changed. This would be small in number just to reduce the load later.
Replacing CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc could be done using Cider-V once these changes are submitted if we want to clean up later. Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36224
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36224 from tanvi-jagtap:assert_end2end_general 0b0e940f5d
PiperOrigin-RevId: 623410297
* Refactor end2end tests to exercise each EventEngine
* fix incorrect bazel_only exclusions
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* microbenchmark fix
* sanitize, fix iOS flub
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* iOS fix
* reviewer feedback
* first pass at excluding EventEngine test expansion
Also caught a few cases where we should not test pollers, but should
test all engines. And two cases where we likely shouldn't be testing
either product.
* end2end fuzzers to be fuzzed differently via EventEngine.
* sanitize
* reviewer feedback
* remove misleading comment
* reviewer feedback: comments
* EE test_init needs to play with our build system
* fix golden file test runner
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
Based on a handful of https://abseil.io/tips, it's generally advised to
only fully-qualify namespaces when in a `using` statement, or when it's
otherwise required for compilation. In all other cases, the general
recommendation is to not fully-qualify.
This change fixes most `grpc.*` namespace uses. There are potential
challenges in trying to make blanket changes to non-gRPC namespace uses,
such as `::testing`, since there is also a `grpc::testing` namespace.
Based on a handful of https://abseil.io/tips, it's generally advised to
only fully-qualify namespaces when in a `using` statement, or when it's
otherwise required for compilation. In all other cases, the general
recommendation is to not fully-qualify.
This change fixes most `grpc.*` namespace uses. There are potential
challenges in trying to make blanket changes to non-gRPC namespace uses,
such as `::testing`, since there is also a `grpc::testing` namespace.
In some cases, depending on the direction of the wind, and the phase of the moon, gtest can interfere with protobuf badly with macros cross-pollution between the two projects. Moving the gtest inclusion at the end makes the problem go away.
- make the directory structure match the package structure
- sanitize the package structure (test --> testing)
- add auto-detection of proto file dependencies
Tanvi Jagtap
Mark D. Roth
Craig Tiller
Yijie Ma
Esun Kim
AJ Heller
Vijay Pai
Nicolas "Pixel" Noble
yang-g
David Garcia Quintas
Jan Tattermusch
Dan Zhang
murgatroid99
Sree Kuchibhotla
Julien Boeuf