This PR also centralizes the client channel resolver selection. Resolver
selection is still done using the plugin system, but when the Ares and
native client channel resolvers go away, we can consider bootstrapping
this differently.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Implement listeners, connection, endpoints for `FuzzingEventEngine`.
Allows the fuzzer to select write sizes and delays, connection delays,
and port assignments.
I made a few modifications to the test suite to admit this event engine
to pass the client & server tests:
1. the test factories return shared_ptr<> to admit us to return the same
event engine for both the oracle and the implementation - necessary
because FuzzingEventEngine forms a closed world of addresses & ports.
2. removed the WaitForSingleOwner calls - these seem unnecessary, and we
don't ask our users to do this - tested existing linux tests 1000x
across debug, asan, tsan with this change
Additionally, the event engine overrides the global port picker logic so
that port assignments are made by the fuzzer too.
This PR is a step along a longer journey, and has some outstanding
brethren PR's, and some follow-up work:
* #32603 will convert all the core e2e tests into a more malleable form
* we'll then use #32667 to turn all of these into fuzzers
* finally we'll integrate this into that work and turn all core e2e
tests into fuzzers over timer & callback reorderings and io
size/spacings
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit 7bd9267f32.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
(hopefully last try)
Add new channel arg GRPC_ARG_ABSOLUTE_MAX_METADATA_SIZE as hard limit
for metadata. Change GRPC_ARG_MAX_METADATA_SIZE to be a soft limit.
Behavior is as follows:
Hard limit
(1) if hard limit is explicitly set, this will be used.
(2) if hard limit is not explicitly set, maximum of default and soft
limit * 1.25 (if soft limit is set) will be used.
Soft limit
(1) if soft limit is explicitly set, this will be used.
(2) if soft limit is not explicitly set, maximum of default and hard
limit * 0.8 (if hard limit is set) will be used.
Requests between soft and hard limit will be rejected randomly, requests
above hard limit will be rejected.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Earlier, we were simply using a 64 bit random number, but the spec
actually calls for UUIDv4.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This PR is a small code change with a lot of new test data.
[In OpenSSL, there are two flags that configure CRL checks. Coping
relevant
section:](https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_depth.html)
> - X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK enables CRL checking for the certificate chain
leaf certificate. An error occurs if a suitable CRL cannot be found.
> - X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL enables CRL checking for the entire
certificate chain.
We currently only set `X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK`, so we will only ever
check if the leaf certificate is revoked. We should check the whole
chain. I am open to making this a user configuration if we want to do it
that way, but we certainly need to be able to check the whole chain.
So, this PR contains the small code change in
`ssl_transport_security.cc` to use the `X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL` flag.
Then the rest of the changes are in tests. I've added all the necessary
files to have a chain built that looks as follows
`Root CA -> Revoked Intermediate CA -> Leaf Certificate`, and added a
test for this case as well.
You can verify that on master this new test will fail (i.e. the
handshake will succeed even though the intermediate CA is revoked) by
checking out this branch, running `git checkout master --
./src/core/tsi/ssl_transport_security.cc`, then running the test.
I also slightly reorganized test/core/tsi/test_creds/ so that the CRLs
are in their own directory, which is the way our API intends to accept
CRLs.
Fixing TSAN data races of the kind -
https://source.cloud.google.com/results/invocations/c3f02253-0d0b-44e6-917d-07e4bc0d3d62/targets/%2F%2Ftest%2Fcpp%2Fperformance:writes_per_rpc_test@poller%3Dpoll/log
I think the original issue was the non-atomic load in
writes_per_rpc_test.cc but also making the change to use barriers
instead of relaxed atomics (probably unimportant but I'll prefer safety
in the absence of otherwise comments).
Could probably also use std::atomic but feeling a bit lazy to make the
changes throughout.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This PR adds the view `grpc.io/client/api_latency` for GCP Observability
which aims to collect the end-to-end time taken by a call.
Changes made to support this -
1) A global interceptor factory registration is created for stats
plugins.
2) OpenCensus plugin now provides a new interceptor that's responsible
for collecting the new latency.
3) Gcp Observability registers this plugin.
4) A new OpenCensus measurement and view is created for api latency.
Note that this is internal as of now, since it's not clear if it should
be exposed as public experimental API. Leaving that decision for the
future.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This PR adds annotations to client attempt spans and server spans on
messages of the form -
* `Send message: 1026 bytes`
* `Send compressed message: 31 bytes` (if message was compressed)
* `Received message: 31 bytes`
* `Received decompressed message: 1026 bytes` (if message needed to be
decompressed)
Note that the compressed and decompressed annotations are not present if
compression/decompression was not performed.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This is a big rewrite of global config.
It does a few things, all somewhat intertwined:
1. centralize the list of configuration we have to a yaml file that can
be parsed, and code generated from it
2. add an initialization and a reset stage so that config vars can be
centrally accessed very quickly without the need for caching them
3. makes the syntax more C++ like (less macros!)
4. (optionally) adds absl flags to the OSS build
This first round of changes is intended to keep the system where it is
without major changes. We pick up absl flags to match internal code and
remove one point of deviation - but importantly continue to read from
the environment variables. In doing so we don't force absl flags on our
customers - it's possible to configure grpc without the flags - but
instead allow users that do use absl flags to configure grpc using that
mechanism. Importantly this lets internal customers configure grpc the
same everywhere.
Future changes along this path will be two-fold:
1. Move documentation generation into the code generation step, so that
within the source of truth yaml file we can find all documentation and
data about a configuration knob - eliminating the chance of forgetting
to document something in all the right places.
2. Provide fuzzing over configurations. Currently most config variables
get stashed in static constants across the codebase. To fuzz over these
we'd need a way to reset those cached values between fuzzing rounds,
something that is terrifically difficult right now, but with these
changes should simply be a reset on `ConfigVars`.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
We currently take named metrics recorded per-request only. Instead we
should merge field-wise.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
1. Make channel creation lazy. This allows test cases to update the
configuration before the connection is made.
2. Pass load reports tracker when creating the policy. This way other
test cases do not see any changes to ChannelArguments.
Using grpc_core::CoreConfiguration::RunWithSpecialConfiguration was
considered but did not work as it removes other builders setup prior to
starting the test cases.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
It is reported in https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/32356 that there
is a race on vptr for `UnimplementedAsyncRequest` which would cause
crashes for multi-threaded server if clients send unimplemented RPC
request to the server.
The cause is that the server requests a call for
`UnimplementedAsyncRequest` in its base class `GenericAsyncRequest` when
the `vptr` still points to the base class's `vtable`. If the call went
in and another server thread picks up the tag before the `vptr` points
back to the derived class's `vtable`, it would call the wrong virtual
function and also this is a data race. This fix makes the request of the
call inside the derived class's constructor.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
PR #32215 added the verified root cert subject to the lower level
`tsi_peer`. This PR is a companion to that and completes the feature by
bubbling the information up to the `TsiCustomVerificationCheckRequest`
which is part of the user facing API for implementing custom
verification callbacks.
Third try for #32466.
This adds an interop client / server for GCP Observability integration
testing.
Everything is new here with no refactor. Plan is to get this in first
before trying to refactor out the flags.
Refactor C++ interop test client flags into the common
`client_helper.h/cc`. This is needed by the observability testing PR
#32466
We need the `ABSL_DECLARE_FLAG` in the header file so that we can share
that across different implementation.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This filter was originally written only for the C++ wrapped layer, but
we have plans to use this for Python (and maybe other wrapped languages
too in the future.)
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
For stats, the StackDriver/OpenCensus API allows setting the
MonitoredResource directly, so use that.
For tracing, there is no explicit MonitoredResource to use, so just
insert it into the attributes for a span.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This test is flaky only with iomgr, this fix will likely fix this.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
The `XdsFaultInjectionMaxFault` test has seen a few flakes since #32326
was merged. I believe the flakiness is caused by the fact that when a
large number of RPCs are queued up before the resolver result comes in,
those RPCs are now re-processed in parallel instead of sequentially,
which can cause us to delay more RPCs than we should due to the
`max_faults` setting. To fix this, we change the test to ensure that the
channel is connected (i.e., the resolver result has already been
returned) before we start sending a large number of concurrent RPCs.
Although this is the only test that I've seen flakes in, I've made this
same change consistently to all fault injection tests that are creating
a large number of concurrent RPCs, since the same flake could affect any
of them.
Eugene Ostroukhov
AJ Heller
Mark D. Roth
Yousuk Seung
apolcyn
Craig Tiller
Alisha Nanda
Esun Kim
Yash Tibrewal
Gregory Cooke
Jan Tattermusch
Mike Kruskal
Yijie Ma
Stanley Cheung