[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging - BUILD
In this CL we are just editing the build and bzl files to add dependencies.
This is done to prevent merge conflict and constantly having to re-make the make files using generate_projects.sh for each set of changes.
Closes#36606
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36606 from tanvi-jagtap:build_test_core_tsi_and_misc 708a724c46
PiperOrigin-RevId: 633518709
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
These changes have been made using string replacement and regex.
Will not be replacing all instances of CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only ones which are doable using very simple regex with least chance of failure will be replaced.
Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36442
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36442 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_xds_tsi_address_utils 5c10771ac1
PiperOrigin-RevId: 628081981
grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
These changes have been made using string replacement
Will not be replacing all instances of CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only ones which are doable using very simple regex with least chance of failure will be replaced.
Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36368
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36368 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_test_02 0072bd8854
PiperOrigin-RevId: 626114257
There were some failures in the Crl Directory related tests after https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36031
This came down to https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36031 adding some CRLs with bad qualities (invalid content/signatures, overriding issuer names) to the `test_creds/crl_data/crls` directory, which is used in the directory reloading tests. The tests began failing on some platforms because they were picking up these bad crls which were failing various checks, but the test was designed to assume that `test_creds/crl_data/crls` was a valid and good directory.
This PR moves the bad CRLs to their own directory to prevent this accidental mash-up of test data. It also adds debug logging to our custom verification stack.
Closes#36122
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36122 from gtcooke94:crl_fix 508dd1370d
PiperOrigin-RevId: 616280898
This PR changes how CRLs are handled purely internally. After discussing with davidben@, there are various problems with the `X509_STORE_set_get_crl` API and we shouldn't use it. This change keeps the behavior and external API the same, but instead of bulk pushing CRL information into OpenSSL, we instead iterate through the built chain and check each certificate for revocation, as well as doing the CRL validation ourselves.
Closes#36031
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36031 from gtcooke94:CrlInternalRefactor 5f4c816648
PiperOrigin-RevId: 615139682
This PR adds the Authority Key Identifier to CertificateInfo. This value _can be_ important in finding the right CRLs to use if there are Issuer name overlaps or a more complicated CA setup with multiple signing keys.
We should observe no behavior change in our `CrlProvider` implementations, this is just adding an important field for users who implement it themselves.
Closes#35931
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35931 from gtcooke94:AkidCheck dd048a53b6
PiperOrigin-RevId: 611143198
…p and add some verification helpers (#35641)"
This reverts commit 310770d61d.
It breaks all portability tests.
```
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test suite.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from CrlUtils
[ RUN ] CrlUtils.HasCrlSignBitExists
/[var/local/git/grpc/test/core/tsi/ssl_transport_security_utils_test.cc:566](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/var/local/git/grpc/test/core/tsi/ssl_transport_security_utils_test.cc?l=566): Failure
Value of: HasCrlSignBit(root_ca_)
Actual: false
Expected: true
[ FAILED ] CrlUtils.HasCrlSignBitExists (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from CrlUtils (0 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test suite ran. (0 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 0 tests.
[ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below:
[ FAILED ] CrlUtils.HasCrlSignBitExists
```
Closes#35962
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35962 from drfloob:revert-310770d61d3b25d358d877a074bebf6ae85549d0 e6a2f03309
PiperOrigin-RevId: 609075479
This PR does 2 distinct things, I can unbundle them if desired
1) Add functions in `ssl_transport_security_utils` and associated tests that will eventually be used for additional Crl validation (the logic of actually doing this will be in a future PR), so other than the tests these fns are currently unused.
2) Remove the use of `X509_NAME_oneline` - it is not a guaranteed stable way to get the issuer name for lookups. Instead, use the DER encoding via `i2d_X509_NAME` - the results in a non-human readable string that is stable for lookup, and necessitated some change to the CrlProvider test code that previously used a human readable string for this value.
Neither should result in behavior changes.
Closes#35641
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35641 from gtcooke94:CrlRefactor 2b6f63717c
PiperOrigin-RevId: 607701254
The basic APIs for the CRL Reloading features.
This adds external types to represent CRL Providers, CRLs, and
CertificateInfo.
Internally we will use `CrlImpl` - this layer is needed to hide OpenSSL
details from the user.
GRFC - https://github.com/grpc/proposal/pull/382
Things Done
* Add external API for `CrlProvider`, `Crl`, `CertInfo` (`CertInfo` is
used during CRL lookup rather than passing the entire certificate).
* Add code paths in `ssl_transport_security` to utilize CRL providers
* Add `StaticCrlProvider`
* Refactor `crl_ssl_transport_security_test.cc` so it is more extensible
and can be used with providers
There is a bug in the SSL stack that was only partially fixed in #29176:
if more than 17kb is written to the BIO buffer, then everything over
17kb will be discarded, and the SSL handshake will fail with a bad
record mac error or hang if not enough bytes have arrived yet.
It's relatively uncommon to hit this bug, because the TLS handshake
messages need to be much larger than normal for you to have a chance of
hitting this bug. However, there was a separate bug in the SSL stack
(recently fixed in #33558) that causes the ServerHello produced by a
gRPC-C++ TLS server to grow linearly in size with the size of the trust
bundle; these 2 bugs combined to cause a large number of TLS handshake
failures for gRPC-C++ clients talking to gRPC-C++ servers when the
server had a large trust bundle.
This PR fixes the bug by ensuring that all bytes are successfully
written to the BIO buffer. An initial quick fix for this bug was planned
in #33611, but abandoned because we were worried about temporarily
doubling the memory footprint of all SSL channels.
The complexity in this PR is mostly in the test: it is fairly tricky to
force gRPC-C++'s SSL stack to generate a sufficiently large ServerHello
to trigger this bug.
This PR is a small code change with a lot of new test data.
[In OpenSSL, there are two flags that configure CRL checks. Coping
relevant
section:](https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_depth.html)
> - X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK enables CRL checking for the certificate chain
leaf certificate. An error occurs if a suitable CRL cannot be found.
> - X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL enables CRL checking for the entire
certificate chain.
We currently only set `X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK`, so we will only ever
check if the leaf certificate is revoked. We should check the whole
chain. I am open to making this a user configuration if we want to do it
that way, but we certainly need to be able to check the whole chain.
So, this PR contains the small code change in
`ssl_transport_security.cc` to use the `X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL` flag.
Then the rest of the changes are in tests. I've added all the necessary
files to have a chain built that looks as follows
`Root CA -> Revoked Intermediate CA -> Leaf Certificate`, and added a
test for this case as well.
You can verify that on master this new test will fail (i.e. the
handshake will succeed even though the intermediate CA is revoked) by
checking out this branch, running `git checkout master --
./src/core/tsi/ssl_transport_security.cc`, then running the test.
I also slightly reorganized test/core/tsi/test_creds/ so that the CRLs
are in their own directory, which is the way our API intends to accept
CRLs.
* Add info about ca cert used to verify chain.
The tsi_peer object will now contain the subject of the root/ca cert
that was used to verify the peer's chain during a handshake.
* temp investigation
* Fix issues relating to overlapping CRL callback
* formatting on ssl_transport_security.cc
* Swap ca_cert naming
* Use preverify_ok instead of numbers
* Continue some renaming, addressing pr comments
* Removed early return if peer property setting fails
* Continue renaming
* clang-tidy
* Fix clang problem
* clang fixes
* Add null check in tests
* More PR changes. Behavior change to include root cert extract when TSI_REQUEST_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE_AND_VERIFY
* Add intermediate ca, leaf cert, and test with them
* clang-tidy
* Basic formatting
* Add new keys to build for export
* Add new cert files to test BUILD
* build file style fix
* changes for chain test
* clang-format
* build clean
* Add $ to lines of code in README
* Add directive about X509_STORE_CTX_get0_chain
* formatting
* Fix all lint errors in repo.
* Use strict buildifier by default
* Whoops. That file does not exist
* Attempt fix to buildifier invocation
* Add missing copyright