Will be used during this transition time to run 5-pipe style filters somewhat more natively. Once everything is getting closer to 5-pipes, we'll drop this method and have the channel stack understand how to create an interception-map that can be reused per-call, instead of creating the interception-map every time a call is created.
Closes#35200
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35200 from ctiller:cg-channel-filter-api 2fc11dd273
PiperOrigin-RevId: 587940947
Changes to fake resolver:
- Add `WaitForReresolutionRequest()` method to fake resolver response
generator to allow tests to tell when re-resolution has been requested.
- Change fake resolver response generator API to have only one mechanism
for injecting results, regardless of whether the result is an error or
whether it's triggered by a re-resolution.
Changes to grpclb_end2end_test:
- Change balancer interface such that instead of setting a list of
responses with fixed delays, the test can control exactly when each
response is set.
- Change balancer impl to always send the initial LB response, as
expected by the grpclb protocol.
- Change balancer impl to always read load reports, even if load
reporting is not expected to be enabled. (The latter case will still
cause the test to fail.) Reads are done in a different thread than
writes.
- Allow each test to directly control how many backends and balancers
are started and the client load reporting interval, so that (a) we don't
waste resources starting servers we don't need and (b) there is no need
to arbitrarily split tests across different test classes.
- Add timeouts to `WaitForAllBackends()` functionality, so that tests
will fail with a useful error rather than timing out.
- Improved ergonomics of various helper functions in the test framework.
In the process of making these changes, I found a couple of bugs:
- A bug in pick_first, which I fixed in #34885.
- A bug in grpclb, in which we were using the wrong condition to decide
whether to propagate a re-resolution request from the child policy,
which I've fixed in this PR. (This bug probably originated way back in
#18344.)
This should address a lot of the flakes seen in grpclb_e2e_test
recently.
Ditch the old priority scheme for ordering filters, instead explicitly
mark up before/after constraints.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Instead of fixing a target size for writes, try to adapt it a little to
observed bandwidth.
The initial algorithm tries to get large writes within 100-1000ms
maximum delay - this range probably wants to be tuned, but let's see.
The hope here is that on slow connections we can not back buffer so much
and so when we need to send a ping-ack it's possible without great
delay.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Fix b/304114403
- adds a new experimental tracer useful for diagnosing ping timeout
failures in unit tests
- adds a pair of experimental tracers for fuzzing event engine
- fix the behavior of FuzzingEventEngine so that a RunAfter(0, ...) runs
in the same tick
- up the rate of sends (reduce the send delay) so we guarantee to be
able to send 200kb/sec in fuzzed e2e unit tests
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Experiment 1: On RST_STREAM: reduce MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS for one round
trip.
Experiment 2: If a settings frame is outstanding with a lower
MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS than is configured, and we receive a new incoming
stream that would exceed the new cap, randomly reject it.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix chttp2 too_many_pings test to use only one of IPv4 or IPv6,
depending on test environment.
Also fix dumb reversed conditional bug in some other tests that was
accidentally introduced in #34426.
Looks like we've got a thread race on shutdown with some of these
tests... adding a barrier at the head of tests that require precise
transport counts in order to stabilize.
Isolate ping callback tracking to its own file.
Also takes the opportunity to simplify keepalive code by applying the
ping timeout to all pings.
Adds an experiment to allow multiple pings outstanding too (this was
originally an accidental behavior change of the work, but one that I
think may be useful going forward).
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
More changes as part of the dualstack design:
- Change resolver and LB policy APIs to support multiple addresses per
endpoint. Specifically, replace `ServerAddress` with
`EndpointAddresses`, which encodes more than one address. Per-address
channel args are retained at the same level, so they are now
per-endpoint. For now, `EndpointAddress` provides a single-address ctor
and a single-address accessor for backward compatibility, so
`ServerAdress` is an alias for `EndpointAddresses`; eventually, this
alias and the single-address methods will be removed.
- Add an `EndpointAddressSet` class, which represents an unordered set
of addresses to be used as a map key. This will be used in a number of
LB policies that need to store per-endpoint state.
- Change the LB policy API's `ChannelControlHelper::CreateSubchannel()`
method to take the address and per-endpoint channel args as separate
parameters, so that we don't need to construct a legacy `ServerAddress`
object as we create a new subchannel for each address in the endpoint.
- Change pick_first to flatten the address list.
- Change ring_hash to use `EndpointAddressSet` as the key for its
endpoint map, and to use the first address of the endpoint as the hash
key.
- Change WRR to use `EndpointAddressSet` as the key for its endpoint
weight map.
Note that support for multiple addresses per endpoint is guarded in RR
by the existing `round_robin_delegate_to_pick_fist` experiment and in
WRR by the existing `wrr_delegate_to_pick_first` experiment.
This PR does *not* include support for multiple addresses per endpoint
for the outlier_detection or xds_override_host LB policies; those will
come in subsequent PRs.
Expand our fuzzing capabilities by allowing fuzzers to choose the bits
that go into random number distribution generators.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
In certain situations the current flow control algorithm can result in
sending one flow control update write for every write sent (known
situation: rollout of promise based server calls with qps_test).
Fix things up so that the updates are only sent when truly needed, and
then fix the fallout (turns out our fuzzer had some bugs)
I've placed actual logic changes behind an experiment so that it can be
incrementally & safely rolled out.
Building out a new framing layer for chttp2.
The central idea here is to have the framing layer be solely responsible
for serialization of frames, and their deserialization - the framing
layer can reject frames that have invalid syntax - but the enacting of
what that frame means is left to a higher layer.
This class will become foundational for the promise conversion of chttp2
- by eliminating action from the parsing of frames we can reuse this
sensitive code.
Right now the new layer is inactive - there's a test that exercises it
relatively well, and not much more. In the next PRs I'll add an
experiments to enable using this layer or the existing code in the
writing and reading paths.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Need the ability to override server-side keepalive permit without calls
default without affecting client-side settings.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Why: Cleanup for chttp2_transport ahead of promise conversion - lots of
logic has become interleaved throughout chttp2, so some effort to
isolate logic out is warranted ahead of that conversion.
What: Split configuration and policy tracking for each of ping rate
throttling and abuse detection into their own modules. Add tests for
them.
Incidentally: Split channel args into their own header so that we can
split the policy stuff into separate build targets.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
In real services most of our time ends up in the `Read1()` function,
which populates one byte into the bit buffer.
Change this to read in as many as possible bytes at a time into that
buffer.
Additionally, generate all possible (to some depth) parser geometries,
and add a benchmark for them. Run that benchmark and select the best
geometry for decoding base64 strings (since this is the main use-case).
(gives about a 30% speed boost parsing base64 then huffman encoded
random binary strings)
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Most of the time parsing succeeds, and only rarely do we see an error.
This change reduces the parse memento size from 120 bytes to 56 bytes.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Along with an experiment this time
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This reverts commit e107ff5e99.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Noticed some inconsistencies in our keepalive configuration -
* Earlier, even if keepalive pings were disabled, we would be scheduling
keepalive pings at an interval of INT_MAX ms.
* We were not using `g_default_client_keepalive_permit_without_calls` /
`g_default_server_keepalive_permit_without_calls`. They are both false
by default but they can be overridden in
`grpc_chttp2_config_default_keepalive_args`.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
The PR also creates a separate BUILD target for:
- chttp2 context list
- iomgr buffer_list
- iomgr internal errqueue
This would allow the context list to be included as standalone
dependencies for EventEngine implementations.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
(hopefully last try)
Add new channel arg GRPC_ARG_ABSOLUTE_MAX_METADATA_SIZE as hard limit
for metadata. Change GRPC_ARG_MAX_METADATA_SIZE to be a soft limit.
Behavior is as follows:
Hard limit
(1) if hard limit is explicitly set, this will be used.
(2) if hard limit is not explicitly set, maximum of default and soft
limit * 1.25 (if soft limit is set) will be used.
Soft limit
(1) if soft limit is explicitly set, this will be used.
(2) if soft limit is not explicitly set, maximum of default and hard
limit * 0.8 (if hard limit is set) will be used.
Requests between soft and hard limit will be rejected randomly, requests
above hard limit will be rejected.
Previously we triggered a flow control update when `announced <
target/2`, but if `target==1` then we fail to send a flow control update
(announced is never less than 1/2==0) and break our forward progress
guarantees.
b/259780449 internally.
Craig Tiller
Mark D. Roth
Alisha Nanda
Yijie Ma
Yash Tibrewal
Esun Kim
Vignesh Babu