We've got a few situations coming up with promises that will want a "broadcast new value to everywhere" situation.
Closes#35552
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35552 from ctiller:obs 30fd697ae3
PiperOrigin-RevId: 599609399
Remove the old `switch` library - this used to be an implementation detail of `Seq`, `TrySeq` - but has become unused.
Add a new user facing primitive `Switch` that fills a similar role to `switch` in C++ - selecting a promise to execute based on a primitive discriminator - much like `If` allows selection based on a boolean discriminator now.
A future change will optimize this to actually lower the `Switch` into an actual `switch` statement, but for right now I want to get the functionality in.
Closes#35424
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35424 from ctiller:switchy 5308a914c6
PiperOrigin-RevId: 595140965
`AllOk` runs a set of promises concurrently, and like `TryJoin` waits for them all to succeed or one to fail.
Unlike `TryJoin` it returns a single unified status of the composition, so cannot handle member promises that might return `StatusOr` or the like.
Closes#35304
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35304 from ctiller:all-review 30f5f809c6
PiperOrigin-RevId: 591031189
Add a variant of `Spawn` that returns a promise that can be awaited by another activity.
This allows us to simply implement complex cross-activity synchronization.
(necessary building block for #34740)
Also adds an inter-activity latch as a building block to test this work.
Closes#34744
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/34744 from ctiller:ninteen-ninety-nine 19074b255f
PiperOrigin-RevId: 582450643
`StatusFlag` acts like a status, but is just a boolean (we don't want to
accidentally treat a boolean as something that indicates failure in case
it's not)
Similarly `ValueOrFailure` looks like `StatusOr` but reduces the failure
space to one value.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Modeled after mutexes in the Rust ecosystem: the mutex owns the data
provided, and acquisition of the mutex returns a handle with which to
manipulate that data.
This fits in nicely with the execution environment we've established
whereby we may want to pass the lock from lambda to lambda for some
time.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Pipe-like type (has a send end, a receive end, and a closing mechanism)
for cross-activity transfers.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Our current implementation of Join, TryJoin leverage some complicated
template stuff to work, which makes them hard to maintain. I've been
thinking about ways to simplify that for some time and had something
like this in mind - using a code generator that's at least a little more
understandable to code generate most of the complexity into a file that
is checkable.
Concurrently - I have a cool optimization in mind - but it requires that
we can move promises after polling, which is a contract change. I'm
going to work through the set of primitives we have in the coming weeks
and change that contract to enable the optimization.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Our current implementation of `Seq`, `TrySeq` leverage some complicated
template stuff to work, which makes them hard to maintain. I've been
thinking about ways to simplify that for some time and had something
like this in mind - using a code generator that's at least a little more
understandable to code generate most of the complexity into a file that
is checkable.
Concurrently - I have a cool optimization in mind - but it requires that
we can move promises after polling, which is a contract change. I'm
going to work through the set of primitives we have in the coming weeks
and change that contract to enable the optimization.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
I have a cool optimization in mind for promises - but it requires that
we can move them after polling, which is a contract change. I'm going to
work through the set of primitives we have in the coming weeks and
change that contract to enable the optimization.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Makes some awkward fixes to compression filter, call, connected channel
to hold the semantics we have upheld now in tests.
Once the fixes described here
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/core/lib/channel/connected_channel.cc#L636
are in this gets a lot less ad-hoc, but that's likely going to be
post-landing promises client & server side.
We specifically need special handling for server side cancellation in
response to reads wrt the inproc transport - which doesn't track
cancellation thoroughly enough itself.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Avoids some compilation problems on older MSVC's, opens the door for
some future optimizations.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
* Refactor end2end tests to exercise each EventEngine
* fix incorrect bazel_only exclusions
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* microbenchmark fix
* sanitize, fix iOS flub
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* iOS fix
* reviewer feedback
* first pass at excluding EventEngine test expansion
Also caught a few cases where we should not test pollers, but should
test all engines. And two cases where we likely shouldn't be testing
either product.
* end2end fuzzers to be fuzzed differently via EventEngine.
* sanitize
* reviewer feedback
* remove misleading comment
* reviewer feedback: comments
* EE test_init needs to play with our build system
* fix golden file test runner
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
Craig Tiller
Yijie Ma
Yash Tibrewal
Cheng-Yu Chung
AJ Heller