[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
Will not be replacing CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only a few - which fit into single - line regex will be changed. This would be small in number just to reduce the load later.
Replacing CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc could be done using Cider-V once these changes are submitted if we want to clean up later. Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36267
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36267 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_grpc_assert_02 3aed626101
PiperOrigin-RevId: 623469007
* Update include
* Clean up `grpc_empty_slice()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_malloc()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_unref()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_ref()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_split_tail()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_split_head()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_sub()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_buffer_add()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_buffer_add_indexed()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_buffer_pop()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_from_static_buffer()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_from_copied_buffer()`
* Clean up `grpc_metadata_array_init()`
* Clean up `grpc_metadata_array_destroy()`
* Clean up `gpr_inf_future()`
* Clean up `gpr_time_0()`
* Clean up `grpc_byte_buffer_copy()`
* Clean up `grpc_byte_buffer_destroy()`
* Clean up `grpc_byte_buffer_length()`
* Clean up `grpc_byte_buffer_reader_init()`
* Clean up `grpc_byte_buffer_reader_destroy()`
* Clean up `grpc_byte_buffer_reader_next()`
* Clean up `grpc_byte_buffer_reader_peek()`
* Clean up `grpc_raw_byte_buffer_create()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_new_with_user_data()`
* Clean up `grpc_slice_new_with_len()`
* Clean up `grpc_call_start_batch()`
* Clean up `grpc_call_cancel_with_status()`
* Clean up `grpc_call_failed_before_recv_message()`
* Clean up `grpc_call_ref()`
* Clean up `grpc_call_unref()`
* Clean up `grpc_call_error_to_string()`
* Fix typos
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* Refactor end2end tests to exercise each EventEngine
* fix incorrect bazel_only exclusions
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* microbenchmark fix
* sanitize, fix iOS flub
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* iOS fix
* reviewer feedback
* first pass at excluding EventEngine test expansion
Also caught a few cases where we should not test pollers, but should
test all engines. And two cases where we likely shouldn't be testing
either product.
* end2end fuzzers to be fuzzed differently via EventEngine.
* sanitize
* reviewer feedback
* remove misleading comment
* reviewer feedback: comments
* EE test_init needs to play with our build system
* fix golden file test runner
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
Based on a handful of https://abseil.io/tips, it's generally advised to
only fully-qualify namespaces when in a `using` statement, or when it's
otherwise required for compilation. In all other cases, the general
recommendation is to not fully-qualify.
This change fixes most `grpc.*` namespace uses. There are potential
challenges in trying to make blanket changes to non-gRPC namespace uses,
such as `::testing`, since there is also a `grpc::testing` namespace.
Based on a handful of https://abseil.io/tips, it's generally advised to
only fully-qualify namespaces when in a `using` statement, or when it's
otherwise required for compilation. In all other cases, the general
recommendation is to not fully-qualify.
This change fixes most `grpc.*` namespace uses. There are potential
challenges in trying to make blanket changes to non-gRPC namespace uses,
such as `::testing`, since there is also a `grpc::testing` namespace.
grpc_byte_buffer_reader_next() copies and references the slice. This
is not always necessary since the caller will not use the slice
after destroying the byte buffer.
A prominent example is the protobuf parser, which
calls grpc_byte_buffer_reader_next() and immediately unrefs the slice
after the call. This ref() and unref() calls can be very expensive
in the hot path.
This commit introduces grpc_byte_buffer_reader_peek() which
essentialy return a pointer to the slice in the buffer, i.e.,
no copies, and no refs.
QPS of 1MiB 1 Channel callback benchmark increases by 5%.
More importantly insructions per cycle is increased by 10%.
Also add tests and benchmarks for byte_buffer_reader_peek()
This commit reaplies 509e77a5a3
grpc_byte_buffer_reader_next() copies and references the slice. This
is not always necessary since the caller will not use the slice
after destroying the byte buffer.
A prominent example is the protobuf parser, which
calls grpc_byte_buffer_reader_next() and immediately unrefs the slice
after the call. This ref() and unref() calls can be very expensive
in the hot path.
This commit introduces grpc_byte_buffer_reader_peek() which
essentialy return a pointer to the slice in the buffer, i.e.,
no copies, and no refs.
QPS of 1MiB 1 Channel callback benchmark increases by 5%.
More importantly insructions per cycle is increased by 10%.
Also add tests and benchmarks for byte_buffer_reader_peek()
Tanvi Jagtap
Yijie Ma
Cheng-Yu Chung
AJ Heller
Craig Tiller
Esun Kim
Vijay Pai
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
ncteisen
Mark D. Roth
Yash Tibrewal
Jan Tattermusch
David Garcia Quintas
Yang Gao
Jorge Canizales