<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Mark D. Roth <roth@google.com>
Co-authored-by: markdroth <markdroth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
A set of simplifications to make this code easier to reason about:
- Replace `SockToPolledFdMap` with `std::map`
- Make the c-ares `close` callback do nothing. Instead, let the ares
wrapper code destroy polled fds as it normally does, and let everything
that hasn't been registered for I/O get destroyed in the
`GrpcPolledFdFactoryWindows` dtor.
- Get rid of `GrpcPolledFdWindowsWrapper`
- Move `socket_notify_on_write` to the `RegisterForOnWriteableLocked`
method. This makes for a nice invariant that no async callback is
pending *unless* a `RegisterForOnWriteableLocked` or
`RegisterForOnReadableLocked` callback is pending.
Related: internal issue b/293321613
Building out a new framing layer for chttp2.
The central idea here is to have the framing layer be solely responsible
for serialization of frames, and their deserialization - the framing
layer can reject frames that have invalid syntax - but the enacting of
what that frame means is left to a higher layer.
This class will become foundational for the promise conversion of chttp2
- by eliminating action from the parsing of frames we can reuse this
sensitive code.
Right now the new layer is inactive - there's a test that exercises it
relatively well, and not much more. In the next PRs I'll add an
experiments to enable using this layer or the existing code in the
writing and reading paths.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
We added this as an exploratory measure for a customer that thought they
were using open census (this turned out to be emphatically false).
Remove it since it's probably not how we ultimately want to do this, and
wait for something better to come along.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR is mainly a set of improvements that allow the C++ Alarm to be
migrated away from legacy iomgr. It cannot be landed without significant
speedup, due to third-parties relying on a fast path for immediate timer
execution with deadlines <= now.
Previous EventEngine performance of bm_alarm, compared to baseline iomgr
timers: *0.014%*
This PR: *2.5%*
Regarding previous failures to land this change: The cloud libraries
team agreed to reduce the amount of stress in their alarm stress test
https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-cpp/pull/12378
The types `google::api::expr::v1alpha1` are available in
`"@com_google_googleapis//google/api/expr/v1alpha1:expr_proto"` and not
`"google_type_expr_upb"`
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Our current implementation of `Seq`, `TrySeq` leverage some complicated
template stuff to work, which makes them hard to maintain. I've been
thinking about ways to simplify that for some time and had something
like this in mind - using a code generator that's at least a little more
understandable to code generate most of the complexity into a file that
is checkable.
Concurrently - I have a cool optimization in mind - but it requires that
we can move promises after polling, which is a contract change. I'm
going to work through the set of primitives we have in the coming weeks
and change that contract to enable the optimization.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
I'm fairly certain that this path should be non-blocking (and making it
so makes the promise based code far more tractable).
This moves the blocking behavior into the blocking server_cc.cc function
that calls `grpc_server_shutdown_and_notify` instead of in that
non-blocking function.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Resolves a set of failures seen rolling out promises - we need to read
all of the incoming payload before doing request matching.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Why: Cleanup for chttp2_transport ahead of promise conversion - lots of
logic has become interleaved throughout chttp2, so some effort to
isolate logic out is warranted ahead of that conversion.
What: Split configuration and policy tracking for each of ping rate
throttling and abuse detection into their own modules. Add tests for
them.
Incidentally: Split channel args into their own header so that we can
split the policy stuff into separate build targets.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
In preparation for implementing the promise based version, separate out
the legacy call data from the filter.
There are two commits here, each representing one phase of this code
movement:
66676d398c moves `class RetryFilter` into
the header and the vtable name into that class, as this will be shared
code between the implementations
4c84f115ad then moves `class
RetryFilter::CallData` into `class RetryFilterLegacyCallData`, and moves
*that* into its own file
Doing so makes me less confused as to what I'm editing going forward.
No functionality should be affected.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
The address attribute interface was intended to provide a mechanism to
pass attributes separately from channel args, for values that do not
affect subchannel behavior and therefore do not need to be present in
the subchannel key, which does include channel args. However, the
mechanism as currently designed is fairly clunky and is probably not the
direction we will want to go in the long term.
Eventually, we will want some mechanism for registering channel args,
which would provide a cleaner way to indicate that a given channel arg
should not be used in the subchannel key, so that we don't need a
completely different mechanism. For now, this PR is just doing an
interim step, which is to establish a special channel arg key prefix to
indicate that an arg is not needed in the subchannel key.
This change simplifies `EventEngine::DNSResolver`'s API based on the
proposal:
[go/event-engine-dns-resolver-api-changes](http://go/event-engine-dns-resolver-api-changes).
Note that this API change + the implementation described in
[go/event-engine-dns-resolver-implementation](http://go/event-engine-dns-resolver-implementation)
has already been tested against our main test suites and are passing
them.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Revert "Revert "[core] Add support for vsock transport"
(https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33276)"
This reverts commit
c5ade3011a.
And fix the issue which broke the python build.
@markdroth@drfloob please review this PR. Thank you very much.
---------
Co-authored-by: AJ Heller <hork@google.com>
The approach of doing a recursive function call to expand the if checks
for known metadata names was tripping up an optimization clang has to
collapse that if/then tree into an optimized tree search over the set of
known strings. By unrolling that loop (with a code generator) we start
to present a pattern that clang *can* recognize, and hopefully get some
more stable and faster code generation as a benefit.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This is another attempt to add support for vsock in grpc since previous
PRs(#24551, #21745) all closed without merging.
The VSOCK address family facilitates communication between
virtual machines and the host they are running on.
This patch will introduce new scheme: [vsock:cid:port] to
support VSOCK address family.
Fixes#32738.
---------
Signed-off-by: Yadong Qi <yadong.qi@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: AJ Heller <hork@google.com>
Co-authored-by: YadongQi <YadongQi@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts the changes made to ring_hash in #29872. The comment in the
picker code specifically says not to change these variables to an
unsigned type, but that's exactly what that PR did. I don't know if this
has actually been causing any problems, but given that we duplicated
this algorithm (and that comment) from elsewhere without doing a
detailed analysis of it, it seems prudent to stick with the types that
the original code suggested were important.
To avoid causing problems for ObjC, I have changed this such that
ring_hash is not built unless we are building with xDS support, which we
exclude on mobile. Currently, there is no way to use ring_hash without
xDS, although that might change in the future; if it does, we can deal
with any problems that arise at that point.
`tools/run_tests/sanity/check_absl_mutex.sh` was broken, a missing paren
crashed the script if run locally. It's unclear yet how our sanity
checks were not complaining about this, `run_tests.py` does not save the
log.
This check compares the host portion of the target name to the authority
header, but in common use cases (e.g. GCS) they may not coincide.
Additionally, this check does not happen in the Go and Java ALTS stacks.
This makes the JSON API visible as part of the C-core API, but in the
`experimental` namespace. It will be used as part of various
experimental APIs that we will be introducing in the near future, such
as the audit logging API.
Reverts grpc/grpc#32924. This breaks the build again, unfortunately.
From `test/core/event_engine/cf:cf_engine_test`:
```
error: module .../grpc/test/core/event_engine/cf:cf_engine_test does not depend on a module exporting 'grpc/support/port_platform.h'
```
@sampajano I recommend looking into CI tests to catch iOS problems
before merging. We can enable EventEngine experiments in the CI
generally once this PR lands, but this broken test is not one of those
experiments. A normal build should have caught this.
cc @HannahShiSFB
Reverts grpc/grpc#33002. Breaks internal builds:
`.../privacy_context:filters does not depend on a module exporting
'.../src/core/lib/channel/context.h'`
Change call attributes to be stored in a `ChunkedVector` instead of
`std::map<>`, so that the storage can be allocated on the arena. This
means that we're now doing a linear search instead of a map lookup, but
the total number of attributes is expected to be low enough that that
should be okay.
Also, we now hide the actual data structure inside of the
`ServiceConfigCallData` object, which required some changes to the
`ConfigSelector` API. Previously, the `ConfigSelector` would return a
`CallConfig` struct, and the client channel would then use the data in
that struct to populate the `ServiceConfigCallData`. This PR changes
that such that the client channel creates the `ServiceConfigCallData`
before invoking the `ConfigSelector`, and it passes the
`ServiceConfigCallData` into the `ConfigSelector` so that the
`ConfigSelector` can populate it directly.
Makes some awkward fixes to compression filter, call, connected channel
to hold the semantics we have upheld now in tests.
Once the fixes described here
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/core/lib/channel/connected_channel.cc#L636
are in this gets a lot less ad-hoc, but that's likely going to be
post-landing promises client & server side.
We specifically need special handling for server side cancellation in
response to reads wrt the inproc transport - which doesn't track
cancellation thoroughly enough itself.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Whilst the per cpu counters probably help single channel contention, we
think it's likely that they're a pessimization when taken fleetwide.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->