* A modest split of `:gpr` for mpscq support
A full split of the `gpr` target into 25 separate targets is building,
but there are some hurdles to get over with respect to ODR violations
and public API support for the gpr library.
This PR splits off a small chunk of that work.
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
* [chttp2] Tune initial window size/max frame size setting
- Only choose frame sizes and initial window sizes that are powers of two - as a more predictable function to avoid flapping.
- If window size drops below 1kb then snap to 0 to avoid frantically changing a value that needn't be
- Allow the initial window size to drop to zero (we have fuzzing in place that says this is safe)
* copy/paste fix
* fix build
* fix
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* fix announce bug
* cleanup
* put this change under an experiment
* more tests
* fix build
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
* client_channel: rewrite illegal status codes from control plane
* rewrite illegal status codes for call creds
* move fail_lb policy out of retry_lb_fail test so it can be reused
* test resolver and LB policy status rewrites
* add test for ConfigSelector status rewriting
* attempt to add client_auth filter unit test
* fix client_auth_filter test
* cleanup test
* fix build
* fix some memory leaks
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* Update client_auth_filter_test.cc
* fix build
* code review comments
* clang-tidy
Co-authored-by: markdroth <markdroth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Craig Tiller <ctiller@google.com>
We spotted this during review of #30569. Not wanting to make a behavior change there I left it as is, but the test advertises TLSv1.3 so it seems likely this should be changed.
* [cleanup] Remove profiling timers
- nobody has used this system in years
- if we needed it, we'd probably rewrite it at this point to be something more modern
- let's remove it until that need arises
* fix
* fixes
We have many tests that create 100 threads or more, and mounting evidence that
this is harmful to our CI environment.
When the original code for many of these tests was written we ran our tests
under run_tests, which had explicit handling for tracking the number of threads
each test needed and making sure that we weren't over subscribing the test
runner. Bazel has no such facility (and the facility in run_tests has since
been removed) and so we need to adjust.
This PR adjusts down a single test and is part of a series so that we can
review and roll back easily if required.
We have many tests that create 100 threads or more, and mounting evidence that
this is harmful to our CI environment.
When the original code for many of these tests was written we ran our tests
under run_tests, which had explicit handling for tracking the number of threads
each test needed and making sure that we weren't over subscribing the test
runner. Bazel has no such facility (and the facility in run_tests has since
been removed) and so we need to adjust.
This PR adjusts down a single test and is part of a series so that we can
review and roll back easily if required.
We have many tests that create 100 threads or more, and mounting evidence that
this is harmful to our CI environment.
When the original code for many of these tests was written we ran our tests
under run_tests, which had explicit handling for tracking the number of threads
each test needed and making sure that we weren't over subscribing the test
runner. Bazel has no such facility (and the facility in run_tests has since
been removed) and so we need to adjust.
This PR adjusts down a single test and is part of a series so that we can
review and roll back easily if required.
We have many tests that create 100 threads or more, and mounting evidence that
this is harmful to our CI environment.
When the original code for many of these tests was written we ran our tests
under run_tests, which had explicit handling for tracking the number of threads
each test needed and making sure that we weren't over subscribing the test
runner. Bazel has no such facility (and the facility in run_tests has since
been removed) and so we need to adjust.
This PR adjusts down a single test and is part of a series so that we can
review and roll back easily if required.
* [fixit] Scale down large tests
We have many tests that create 100 threads or more, and mounting evidence that
this is harmful to our CI environment.
When the original code for many of these tests was written we ran our tests
under run_tests, which had explicit handling for tracking the number of threads
each test needed and making sure that we weren't over subscribing the test
runner. Bazel has no such facility (and the facility in run_tests has since
been removed) and so we need to adjust.
This PR adjusts down a single test and is part of a series so that we can
review and roll back easily if required.
* mark up cpu usage
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
We have many tests that create 100 threads or more, and mounting evidence that
this is harmful to our CI environment.
When the original code for many of these tests was written we ran our tests
under run_tests, which had explicit handling for tracking the number of threads
each test needed and making sure that we weren't over subscribing the test
runner. Bazel has no such facility (and the facility in run_tests has since
been removed) and so we need to adjust.
This PR adjusts down a single test and is part of a series so that we can
review and roll back easily if required.
We have many tests that create 100 threads or more, and mounting evidence that
this is harmful to our CI environment.
When the original code for many of these tests was written we ran our tests
under run_tests, which had explicit handling for tracking the number of threads
each test needed and making sure that we weren't over subscribing the test
runner. Bazel has no such facility (and the facility in run_tests has since
been removed) and so we need to adjust.
This PR adjusts down a single test and is part of a series so that we can
review and roll back easily if required.