[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging - BUILD
In this CL we are just editing the build and bzl files to add dependencies.
This is done to prevent merge conflict and constantly having to re-make the make files using generate_projects.sh for each set of changes.
Closes#36604
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36604 from tanvi-jagtap:build_test_core_misc_01 8995ba4914
PiperOrigin-RevId: 633519619
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK.
These changes have been made using string replacement and regex.
Will not be replacing all instances of CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only ones which are doable using very simple regex with least chance of failure will be replaced.
Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36457
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36457 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_misc_test 978d0411b8
PiperOrigin-RevId: 628949744
Introduce the interception chain type.
Also introduces the real call-v3 call spine based atop CallFilters.
Closes#36414
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36414 from ctiller:interception-chain 90c8e96973
PiperOrigin-RevId: 627784183
We've got a few situations coming up with promises that will want a "broadcast new value to everywhere" situation.
Closes#35552
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35552 from ctiller:obs 30fd697ae3
PiperOrigin-RevId: 599609399
Remove the old `switch` library - this used to be an implementation detail of `Seq`, `TrySeq` - but has become unused.
Add a new user facing primitive `Switch` that fills a similar role to `switch` in C++ - selecting a promise to execute based on a primitive discriminator - much like `If` allows selection based on a boolean discriminator now.
A future change will optimize this to actually lower the `Switch` into an actual `switch` statement, but for right now I want to get the functionality in.
Closes#35424
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35424 from ctiller:switchy 5308a914c6
PiperOrigin-RevId: 595140965
`AllOk` runs a set of promises concurrently, and like `TryJoin` waits for them all to succeed or one to fail.
Unlike `TryJoin` it returns a single unified status of the composition, so cannot handle member promises that might return `StatusOr` or the like.
Closes#35304
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/35304 from ctiller:all-review 30f5f809c6
PiperOrigin-RevId: 591031189
Add a variant of `Spawn` that returns a promise that can be awaited by another activity.
This allows us to simply implement complex cross-activity synchronization.
(necessary building block for #34740)
Also adds an inter-activity latch as a building block to test this work.
Closes#34744
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/34744 from ctiller:ninteen-ninety-nine 19074b255f
PiperOrigin-RevId: 582450643
`StatusFlag` acts like a status, but is just a boolean (we don't want to
accidentally treat a boolean as something that indicates failure in case
it's not)
Similarly `ValueOrFailure` looks like `StatusOr` but reduces the failure
space to one value.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Modeled after mutexes in the Rust ecosystem: the mutex owns the data
provided, and acquisition of the mutex returns a handle with which to
manipulate that data.
This fits in nicely with the execution environment we've established
whereby we may want to pass the lock from lambda to lambda for some
time.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Pipe-like type (has a send end, a receive end, and a closing mechanism)
for cross-activity transfers.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Our current implementation of Join, TryJoin leverage some complicated
template stuff to work, which makes them hard to maintain. I've been
thinking about ways to simplify that for some time and had something
like this in mind - using a code generator that's at least a little more
understandable to code generate most of the complexity into a file that
is checkable.
Concurrently - I have a cool optimization in mind - but it requires that
we can move promises after polling, which is a contract change. I'm
going to work through the set of primitives we have in the coming weeks
and change that contract to enable the optimization.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Our current implementation of `Seq`, `TrySeq` leverage some complicated
template stuff to work, which makes them hard to maintain. I've been
thinking about ways to simplify that for some time and had something
like this in mind - using a code generator that's at least a little more
understandable to code generate most of the complexity into a file that
is checkable.
Concurrently - I have a cool optimization in mind - but it requires that
we can move promises after polling, which is a contract change. I'm
going to work through the set of primitives we have in the coming weeks
and change that contract to enable the optimization.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
I have a cool optimization in mind for promises - but it requires that
we can move them after polling, which is a contract change. I'm going to
work through the set of primitives we have in the coming weeks and
change that contract to enable the optimization.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Makes some awkward fixes to compression filter, call, connected channel
to hold the semantics we have upheld now in tests.
Once the fixes described here
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/core/lib/channel/connected_channel.cc#L636
are in this gets a lot less ad-hoc, but that's likely going to be
post-landing promises client & server side.
We specifically need special handling for server side cancellation in
response to reads wrt the inproc transport - which doesn't track
cancellation thoroughly enough itself.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Avoids some compilation problems on older MSVC's, opens the door for
some future optimizations.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Tanvi Jagtap
Mark D. Roth
Craig Tiller
Yijie Ma
Yash Tibrewal
Cheng-Yu Chung
AJ Heller