Some user reported an issue that symbols from CoreFoundation are missing
when install grpc/grpc-tools inside Conda:
* https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/33714
* https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/34135
This PR adds the `-framework CoreFoundation` flag so no workarounds are
required from user.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Reverts grpc/grpc#34667
The change was reverted because it failed to import to g3, after some
changes, now it's safe to reapply those changes.
Tested by importing this PR internally, it passed presubmit:
cl/573836270
The basic APIs for the CRL Reloading features.
This adds external types to represent CRL Providers, CRLs, and
CertificateInfo.
Internally we will use `CrlImpl` - this layer is needed to hide OpenSSL
details from the user.
GRFC - https://github.com/grpc/proposal/pull/382
Things Done
* Add external API for `CrlProvider`, `Crl`, `CertInfo` (`CertInfo` is
used during CRL lookup rather than passing the entire certificate).
* Add code paths in `ssl_transport_security` to utilize CRL providers
* Add `StaticCrlProvider`
* Refactor `crl_ssl_transport_security_test.cc` so it is more extensible
and can be used with providers
We're not running any test at all from `run_test.py` because of the way
we filter test cases:
1d136fd05f/src/python/grpcio_tests/tests/_runner.py (L137)
* `testcase_filter` is read from a json file (like [this
one](https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/python/grpcio_tests/tests/tests.json))
and test name is similar to `unit._metadata_test.MetadataTest`.
* `case.id()` is loaded by `iterate_suite_cases` and will always have a
prefix of `tests`, an example of case id will be:
`tests.unit._metadata_test.MetadataTest`.
Because of the prefix, none of the test case will be matched thus we're
not running any of the tests.
This PR fixes the prefix issue and all the regressions comes from not
running tests using `run_test.py`.
#### Other Changes
* Added couple of `__init__.py` file since it's required to load tests.
* Added `py_status_code` to Aio rpc state.
* `code()` is expecting to return a python gRPC code but current
`status_code` is a Cython code.
* Added `libsqlite3-dev` to our dockers because it's required for
`coverage==7.2.0`.
* Renamed csds and admin test because test case file have to end with
`_test`:
1d136fd05f/src/python/grpcio_tests/tests/_loader.py (L26)
* Removed gevent test from `run_test.py` because Bazel gevent tests
should be good enough for us.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Expand our fuzzing capabilities by allowing fuzzers to choose the bits
that go into random number distribution generators.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Changes -
* CsmObservability doesn't need `SetTargetSelector`. Removed it.
* Added missing plumbing of `ServiceMeshLabelsInjector` in
`CsmObservability` to actually do the metadata exchange.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
### Background
* `distutils` is deprecated with removal planned for Python 3.12
([pep-0632](https://peps.python.org/pep-0632/)), thus we're trying to
replace all distutils usage with setuptools.
* Please note that user still have access to `distutils` if setuptools
is installed and `SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS` is set to `local` (The
default in setuptools, more details can be found [in this
discussion](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/2806#issuecomment-1193336591)).
### How we decide the replacement
* We're following setuptools [Porting from Distutils
guide](https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/deprecated/distutils-legacy.html#porting-from-distutils)
when deciding the replacement.
#### Replacement not mentioned in the guide
* Replaced `distutils.utils.get_platform()` with
`sysconfig.get_platform()`.
* Based on the [answer
here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71664875/what-is-the-replacement-for-distutils-util-get-platform),
and also checked the document that `sysconfig.get_platform()` is good
enough for our use cases.
* Replaced `DistutilsOptionError` with `OptionError`.
* `setuptools.error` is exporting it as `OptionError` [in the
code](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/blob/v59.6.0/setuptools/errors.py).
* Upgrade `setuptools` in `test_packages.sh` and changed the version
ping to `59.6.0` in `build_artifact_python.bat`.
* `distutils.errors.*` is not fully re-exported until `59.0.0` (See
[this issue](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/2698) for more
details).
### Changes not included in this PR
* We're patching some compiler related functions provided by distutils
in our code
([example](ee4efc31c1/src/python/grpcio/_spawn_patch.py (L30))),
but since `setuptools` doesn't have similar interface (See [this issue
for more details](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/2806)), we
don't have a clear path to replace them yet.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
A new metadata type `x-envoy-peer-metadata` is being introduced. We
don't have a better way to do this at the moment compared to just adding
it in `metadata_batch.h`.
The GSM Observability plugin uses this metadata to send topology
information to peers in the form of serialized and base64 encoded
`google::protobuf::Struct`. The individual keys being used inside the
struct are subject to change.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Update from gtcooke94:
This PR adds support to build gRPC and it's tests with OpenSSL3. There were some
hiccups with tests as the tests with openssl haven't been built or exercised in a
few months, so they needed some work to fix.
Right now I expect all test files to pass except the following:
- h2_ssl_cert_test
- ssl_transport_security_utils_test
I confirmed locally that these tests fail with OpenSSL 1.1.1 as well,
thus we are at least not introducing regressions. Thus, I've added compiler directives around these tests so they only build when using BoringSSL.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gregory Cooke <gregorycooke@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Esun Kim <veblush@google.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
The types `google::api::expr::v1alpha1` are available in
`"@com_google_googleapis//google/api/expr/v1alpha1:expr_proto"` and not
`"google_type_expr_upb"`
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Not adding CMake support yet
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This PR:
- Fixes the xds-protos Python package, which was broken when the `udpa`
submodule was removed
- This required re-adding the protoc-gen-validate submodule
- Adds non-Bazel tests for xds-protos and all of its dependent packages
- Versions xds-protos the same way as the rest of the Python packages
- Fixes Python 3.11 support in `run_tests.py`, which is necessary for
the testing mentioned above
CC @sergiitk You won't be able to consume this in the interop tests
until it makes it into a release. I'm thinking I'll want to backport
this to the 1.57.x branch to make that happen faster.
CC @drfloob to inform him about the likely backport.
PanCakes to the rescue!
We noticed that our 'sanity' test was going to fail, but we think we can
fix that automatically, so we put together this PR to do just that!
If you'd like to opt-out of these PR's, add yourself to NO_AUTOFIX_USERS
in .github/workflows/pr-auto-fix.yaml
Co-authored-by: Vignesh2208 <Vignesh2208@users.noreply.github.com>
This (or something like it) is necessary for the automated protobuf
upgrade script, to ensure we don't commit a redundant third_party tree
to the repo. Here is an example of the protobuf upgrade without this
fix: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33625
One alternative could be adding the filepaths to `.gitignore`.
Spun off from https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/33695
Note that the plugin is still under `grpc::internal` namespace and not
under `experimental` intentionally.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This was done manually due to a problem with
`tools/distrib/python/make_grpcio_tools.py`. ~I fixed it in this PR
(depends on cl/547979185), so there is a fair chance this upgrade will
work normally for the next release.~ The fix may be problematic for
upgrading protobuf on older release branches, so the improvement will be
worked on separately. CC @jtattermusch
This also updates the UPB dep to the latest commit on the 23.x branch.
Adds a test for the experiments codegen. It updates the codegen to parse
test_experiments.yaml and test_experiments_rollouts.yaml files and
generate test_experiments.h and test_experiments.cc files along with an
experiments_test.cc file. The experiments test verifies the returned
value of IsExperimentEnabled with the expected value.
Add bazel dependency on opentelemetry-cpp.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
We should probably cap this so that our customers have a chance of
cloning the repository.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
- Switched from yapf to black
- Reconfigure isort for black
- Resolve black/pylint idiosyncrasies
Note: I used `--experimental-string-processing` because black was
producing "implicit string concatenation", similar to what described
here: https://github.com/psf/black/issues/1837. While currently this
feature is experimental, it will be enabled by default:
https://github.com/psf/black/issues/2188. After running black with the
new string processing so that the generated code merges these `"hello" "
world"` strings concatenations, then I removed
`--experimental-string-processing` for stability, and regenerated the
code again.
To the reviewer: don't even try to open "Files Changed" tab 😄 It's
better to review commit-by-commit, and ignore `run black and isort`.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
It's completely legitimate to have a zero in a filename/include guard.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Craig Tiller
AJ Heller
Yash Tibrewal
Esun Kim
Gregory Cooke
Xuan Wang
apolcyn
Richard Belleville
Eugene Ostroukhov
jrandolf
Yijie Ma
Vignesh Babu
github-actions[bot]
Mark D. Roth
Sergii Tkachenko