Instead of fixing a target size for writes, try to adapt it a little to
observed bandwidth.
The initial algorithm tries to get large writes within 100-1000ms
maximum delay - this range probably wants to be tuned, but let's see.
The hope here is that on slow connections we can not back buffer so much
and so when we need to send a ping-ack it's possible without great
delay.
The `TickForDuration()` method was using `grpc_core::Timestamp::Now()`
to get the current time, but that was not in sync with the `now_` value
inside the Fuzzing EE itself, with the result that after two subsequent
250ms increments, timers were not being properly fired. I've added a
test that demonstrates this failure without the fix.
Experiment 1: On RST_STREAM: reduce MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS for one round
trip.
Experiment 2: If a settings frame is outstanding with a lower
MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS than is configured, and we receive a new incoming
stream that would exceed the new cap, randomly reject it.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This is the initial change of chaotic-good client transport read path,
which is a following PR of the client transport write path at #33876.
There's a pending work of handling endpoint failures in the transport.
It will be added after we have the inter-activity pipe with close
function.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
- Fixes support for the same address being present more than once in the
address list, which was accidentally broken in #34244.
- Change the call attribute to encode the hash as an integer instead of
a string.
Isolate ping callback tracking to its own file.
Also takes the opportunity to simplify keepalive code by applying the
ping timeout to all pings.
Adds an experiment to allow multiple pings outstanding too (this was
originally an accidental behavior change of the work, but one that I
think may be useful going forward).
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
More changes as part of the dualstack design:
- Change resolver and LB policy APIs to support multiple addresses per
endpoint. Specifically, replace `ServerAddress` with
`EndpointAddresses`, which encodes more than one address. Per-address
channel args are retained at the same level, so they are now
per-endpoint. For now, `EndpointAddress` provides a single-address ctor
and a single-address accessor for backward compatibility, so
`ServerAdress` is an alias for `EndpointAddresses`; eventually, this
alias and the single-address methods will be removed.
- Add an `EndpointAddressSet` class, which represents an unordered set
of addresses to be used as a map key. This will be used in a number of
LB policies that need to store per-endpoint state.
- Change the LB policy API's `ChannelControlHelper::CreateSubchannel()`
method to take the address and per-endpoint channel args as separate
parameters, so that we don't need to construct a legacy `ServerAddress`
object as we create a new subchannel for each address in the endpoint.
- Change pick_first to flatten the address list.
- Change ring_hash to use `EndpointAddressSet` as the key for its
endpoint map, and to use the first address of the endpoint as the hash
key.
- Change WRR to use `EndpointAddressSet` as the key for its endpoint
weight map.
Note that support for multiple addresses per endpoint is guarded in RR
by the existing `round_robin_delegate_to_pick_fist` experiment and in
WRR by the existing `wrr_delegate_to_pick_first` experiment.
This PR does *not* include support for multiple addresses per endpoint
for the outlier_detection or xds_override_host LB policies; those will
come in subsequent PRs.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Expand our fuzzing capabilities by allowing fuzzers to choose the bits
that go into random number distribution generators.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This has been stable for a bit, everywhere that the EventEngine is
enabled. Going forward, I think the event_engine_{client|listener}
experiments can probably be used to regulate thread-pool-specific
issues.
---------
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
Most recent attempt was #34320, reverted in #34335.
The first commit here is a pure revert. The second commit fixes the
outlier_detection unit test to pass both with and without the
experiment.
This is a follow up to https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/34103
That pull request explicitly aimed to introduce shared library builds
for Windows (DLLs) while effecting zero material change to the existing
build pipelines. That aspiration meant that the grpc++_unsecure library
had to be effectively excluded from the build (because including it
would have also included a dependency on openssl, which makes no sense
given its purpose)
This PR addresses that by:
* Extracting the single function in grpc_tls_certificate_provider with a
dependency on openssl into a separate compilation unit
* Including that new .cc file into the grpc library
* Including grpc_tls_certificate_provider and one other source file into
grpc_unsecure for the Windows DLL build only.
* Reinstating the grpc++_unsecure library which is a prerequisite for
many tests.
* Regenerating all files affected by the changes in Bazel BUILD that
introduce the new source file.
This change does affect the operation of other build pipelines - I have
confirmed that it does not break the Linux Bazel build.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Towards https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/33032,
Reopen after botched force-push in #33175 that then got "merged" and
cannot be reopened anymore.
More context in that PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Isuru Fernando <isuruf@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Chamberlin <david.chamberlin@ln.email.gs.com>
PanCakes to the rescue!
We noticed that our 'sanity' test was going to fail, but we think we can
fix that automatically, so we put together this PR to do just that!
If you'd like to opt-out of these PR's, add yourself to NO_AUTOFIX_USERS
in .github/workflows/pr-auto-fix.yaml
Co-authored-by: sergiitk <sergiitk@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Mark D. Roth <roth@google.com>
Co-authored-by: markdroth <markdroth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Pipe-like type (has a send end, a receive end, and a closing mechanism)
for cross-activity transfers.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Building out a new framing layer for chttp2.
The central idea here is to have the framing layer be solely responsible
for serialization of frames, and their deserialization - the framing
layer can reject frames that have invalid syntax - but the enacting of
what that frame means is left to a higher layer.
This class will become foundational for the promise conversion of chttp2
- by eliminating action from the parsing of frames we can reuse this
sensitive code.
Right now the new layer is inactive - there's a test that exercises it
relatively well, and not much more. In the next PRs I'll add an
experiments to enable using this layer or the existing code in the
writing and reading paths.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This is the initial implementation of the chaotic-good client transport
write path. There will be a follow-up PR to fulfill the read path.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Craig Tiller
Eugene Ostroukhov
Mark D. Roth
nanahpang
Richard Belleville
AJ Heller
Gregory Cooke
David Chamberlin
h-vetinari
github-actions[bot]
Esun Kim