<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
We just found out that our current Bazel setup does not support Python
3.11.
Thus PR updates some dependencies to allow using Bazel in Python 3.11.
Cython:
* Cython [backported Python 3.11 support change to
0.29x](https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/4500), but it appears
that the Cython version we are using in Bazel does not include the fix,
so we're using the latest stable version instead.
Gevent:
* The first version of gevent that supports [Python 3.11 is
22.08.0](https://github.com/gevent/gevent/issues/1903#issuecomment-1303227507).
#### Testing
* Tested locally using Python 3.11 virtual environment, was able to
reproduce the issue and verified that those changes were able to fix it.
This is a hack to get around an issue on Apple devices caused by the
PosixEventEngine's `poll` poller not supporting fork. This PR disables
the EventEngine poller entirely in Python builds. It will therefore
prevent the release of the EventEngine generally, and prevent any
testing of EventEngine integration with gRPC Python, until the `poll`
poller is fixed.
Change was created by the release automation script. See go/grpc-release
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Yash Tibrewal <yashkt@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Esun Kim <veblush@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark D. Roth <roth@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Yousuk Seung <ysseung@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Craig Tiller <ctiller@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Belleville <rbellevi@google.com>
Co-authored-by: gnossen <gnossen@users.noreply.github.com>
The PR does the following:
* Splits the single experiments.yaml file into two files:
experiments.yaml and rollouts.yaml.
* The experiments.yaml will now only include experiment definitions. The
default values of the experiments must now be specified in rollouts.yaml
* Removes the 'release' default value because it is not used.
* Adds an additional_constraints character string to ExperimentMetadata.
* Introduces a hook in src/core/lib/experiments/config.h to allow
registering arbitrary experiment constraint validation callbacks. These
callbacks would take an ExperimentMetadata object as input and return
the correct value to use for an experiment subject to additional
constraints.
We defaulted this on 5 months ago, and it seems to be working... let's
remove the experiment bit!
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
I have not been able to reproduce the non-empty pool @ shutdown bug in
around 200k runs of various kinds. Now that experiments are marked flaky
by default, any similar failures should not block PR submission, and
this will give me good signal if the bugs reproduce more frequently in
the CI environment.
I have a fix in theory, but I don't think it should be necessary. If the
bug reproduces, I'll try the fix.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit 1624542ea4, relanding
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/32956
Because of some proto dependency and build problems internally, I've
removed the ServiceConfig proto fuzzing component. These build issues
can hopefully be resolved soon, and then we can re-add the deleted
implementation from commit
[b078c9c](b078c9c015)
in this PR.
#thistimeforsure
a863532c62 adds some debug to help track
which batches get leaked by a transport
3203e75ec5 makes connected_channel respect
the high level intent of cancellation better (and fixes the last reason
we needed to turn these tests off)
aaf5fa036b re-enables testing of c++ e2e
tests with server based promise calls
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This will change behavior for tests that have experiments enabled on
them to always have the flaky bit on.
In doing so, we'll get the usual failure reporting we do in the internal
chat bot, but allow PRs to pass even if an experiment isn't 100% passing
yet - reducing friction slightly for landing bigger experiments.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
This PR implements a work-stealing thread pool for use inside
EventEngine implementations. Because of historical risks here, I've
guarded the new implementation behind an experiment flag:
`GRPC_EXPERIMENTS=work_stealing`. Current default behavior is the
original thread pool implementation.
Benchmarks look very promising:
```
bazel test \
--test_timeout=300 \
--config=opt -c opt \
--test_output=streamed \
--test_arg='--benchmark_format=csv' \
--test_arg='--benchmark_min_time=0.15' \
--test_arg='--benchmark_filter=_FanOut' \
--test_arg='--benchmark_repetitions=15' \
--test_arg='--benchmark_report_aggregates_only=true' \
test/cpp/microbenchmarks:bm_thread_pool
```
2023-05-04: `bm_thread_pool` benchmark results on my local machine (64
core ThreadRipper PRO 3995WX, 256GB memory), comparing this PR to
master:
2023-05-04: `bm_thread_pool` benchmark results in the Linux RBE
environment (unsure of machine configuration, likely small), comparing
this PR to master.
---------
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Makes some awkward fixes to compression filter, call, connected channel
to hold the semantics we have upheld now in tests.
Once the fixes described here
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/core/lib/channel/connected_channel.cc#L636
are in this gets a lot less ad-hoc, but that's likely going to be
post-landing promises client & server side.
We specifically need special handling for server side cancellation in
response to reads wrt the inproc transport - which doesn't track
cancellation thoroughly enough itself.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Oops I missed important changes from
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/32712. And it turned out that there
are two problems that I couldn't fix at this point.
- Windows Bazel RBE Linker Error: This may be caused by how new Bazel 6
invokes build tools chain but it's not clear. I put workaround to use
Bazel 5 by using `OVERRIDE_BAZEL_VERSION=5.4.1`
- Rule `rules_pods` to fetch CronetFramework from CocoaPod has
incompatibility with sort of built-in apple toolchain.
(https://github.com/bazel-xcode/PodToBUILD/issues/232): I couldn't find
a workaround to fix this so I ended up disabling all tests depending
this target.
The PR also creates a separate BUILD target for:
- chttp2 context list
- iomgr buffer_list
- iomgr internal errqueue
This would allow the context list to be included as standalone
dependencies for EventEngine implementations.
The very non-trivial upgrade of third_party/protobuf to 22.x
This PR strives to be as small as possible and many changes that were
compatible with protobuf 21.x and didn't have to be merged atomically
with the upgrade were already merged.
Due to the complexity of the upgrade, this PR wasn't created
automatically by a tool, but manually. Subsequent upgraded of
third_party/protobuf with our OSS release script should work again once
this change is merged.
This is best reviewed commit-by-commit, I tried to group changes in
logical areas.
Notable changes:
- the upgrade of third_party/protobuf submodule, the bazel protobuf
dependency itself
- upgrade of UPB dependency to 22.x (in the past, we used to always
upgrade upb to "main", but upb now has release branch as well). UPB
needs to be upgraded atomically with protobuf since there's a de-facto
circular dependency (new protobuf depends on new upb, which depends on
new protobuf for codegen).
- some protobuf and upb bazel rules are now aliases, so `
extract_metadata_from_bazel_xml.py` and `gen_upb_api_from_bazel_xml.py`
had to be modified to be able to follow aliases and reach the actual
aliased targets.
- some protobuf public headers were renamed, so especially
`src/compiler` needed to be updated to use the new headers.
- protobuf and upb now both depend on utf8_range project, so since we
bundle upb with grpc in some languages, we now have to bundle utf8_range
as well (hence changes in build for python, PHP, objC, cmake etc).
- protoc now depends on absl and utf8_range (previously protobuf had
absl dependency, but not for the codegen part), so python's
make_grpcio_tools.py required partial rewrite to be able to handle those
dependencies in the grpcio_tools build.
- many updates and fixes required for C++ distribtests (currently they
all pass, but we'll probably need to follow up, make protobuf's and
grpc's handling of dependencies more aligned and revisit the
distribtests)
- bunch of other changes mostly due to overhaul of protobuf's and upb's
internal build layout.
TODOs:
- [DONE] make sure IWYU and clang_tidy_code pass
- create a list of followups (e.g. work to reenable the few tests I had
to disable and to remove workaround I had to use)
- [DONE in cl/523706129] figure out problem(s) with internal import
---------
Co-authored-by: Craig Tiller <ctiller@google.com>
This enables the EventEngine experiments in end2end tests, excluding the
ResourceQuota tests which have known failures.
Some Windows tests are hanging, so they will be enabled later.
---------
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Expand server promises to run with C++ end2end tests.
Across connected_channel/call/batch_builder/pipe/transport:
- fix a bug where read errors weren't propagated from transport to call
so that we can populate failed_before_recv_message for the c++ bindings
- ensure those errors are not, however, used to populate the returned
call status
Add a new latch call arg to lazily propagate the bound CQ for a server
call (and client call, but here it's used degenerately - it's always
populated). This allows server calls to be properly bound to
pollsets.(1)/(2)
In call.cc:
- move some profiling code from FilterStackCall to Call, and then use it
in PromiseBasedCall (this should be cleaned up with tracing work)
- implement GetServerAuthority
In server.cc:
- use an RAII pattern on `MatchResult` to avoid a bug whereby a tag
could be dropped if we cancel a request after it's been matched but
before it's published
- fix deadline export to ServerContext
In resource_quota_server.cc:
- fix some long standing flakes (that were finally obvious with the new
test code) - it's legal here to have client calls not arrive at the
server due to resource starvation, work through that (includes adding
expectations during a `Step` call, which required some small tweaks to
cq_verifier)
In the C++ end2end_test.cc:
- strengthen a flaky test so it passes consistently (it's likely we'll
revisit this with the fuzzing efforts to strengthen it into an actually
robust test)
(1) It's time to remove this concept
(2) Surprisingly the only test that *reliably* demonstrates this not
being done is time_change_test
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit 7bd9267f32.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Update to
5501a1a255
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
AJ Heller
Yousuk Seung
Xuan Wang
Vignesh Babu
Yijie Ma
Craig Tiller
Esun Kim
Yash Tibrewal
Jan Tattermusch
Luwei Ge
Mark D. Roth
Stanley Cheung
