* docs/PROBLEMS: Mention rendering differences on different

platforms.
Suggested and worded by Jason Owen <jason.a.owen@gmail.com>.

ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-02-24  Werner Lemberg  <wl@gnu.org>
+
+	* docs/PROBLEMS: Mention rendering differences on different
+	platforms.
+	Suggested and worded by Jason Owen <jason.a.owen@gmail.com>.
+
 2011-02-24  Werner Lemberg  <wl@gnu.org>
 
 	[autofit] Comment out unused code.

docs/PROBLEMS

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Running Problems
 -----
 
 Of course,  there might be  bugs in FreeType,  but some fonts based on
-the  PostScript  format can't  behandled indeed.  The  reason  is that
+the  PostScript  format can't  be handled indeed.  The reason  is that
 FreeType  doesn't contain a full  PostScript  interpreter  but applies
 pattern matching instead.  In case a font doesn't follow the  standard
 structure of the given font format, FreeType fails.  A typical example
@@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ It might be  possible to patch  FreeType in  some situations,  though.
 Please report failing fonts so that we investigate the problem and set
 up a list of such problematic fonts.
 
+
+* Why do identical FreeType  versions render differently  on different
+  platforms?
+
+-----
+
+Different distributions compile FreeType with different options.   The
+developer  version of  a  distribution's  FreeType  package,  which is
+needed to compile  your program  against FreeType,  includes the  file
+ftoption.h.  Compare  each platform's  copy of ftoption.h to  find the
+differences.
+
+
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------