# API style guidelines Generally follow guidance at https://cloud.google.com/apis/design/, in particular for proto3 as described at: * https://cloud.google.com/apis/design/proto3 * https://cloud.google.com/apis/design/naming_convention * https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/style In addition, the following conventions should be followed: * For protos that are [frozen](https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/configuration/overview/v2_overview#status), the following guidelines are followed: * Fields should not be renumbered or have their types changed. This is standard proto development procedure. * If fields are deleted, the following syntax should be put in their place: ```proto reserved ; ``` E.g., ```proto reserved 15; ``` * Renaming of fields or package namespaces for a proto must not occur. This is inherently dangerous, since: * Fields renames break wire compatibility. This is stricter than standard proto development procedure in the sense that it does not break binary wire format. However, it **does** break loading of YAML/JSON into protos as well as text protos. Since we consider YAML/JSON to be first class inputs, we must not change field names. * For service definitions, the gRPC endpoint URL is inferred from package namespace, so this will break client/server communication. * For a message embedded in an `Any` object, the type URL, which the package namespace is a part of, may be used by Envoy or other API consuming code. Currently, this applies to the top-level resources embedded in `DiscoveryResponse` objects, e.g. `Cluster`, `Listener`, etc. * Consuming code will break and require source change to match the changes. * Non-frozen fields should be tagged with `[#not-implemented-hide:]`, `[#not-implemented-warn:]`, `[#proto-status: draft]` or `[#proto-status: experimental]`. * Every proto directory should have a `README.md` describing its content. See for example [envoy.service](envoy/service/README.md). * The data plane APIs are primarily intended for machine generation and consumption. It is expected that the management server is responsible for mapping higher level configuration concepts to concrete API concepts. Similarly, static configuration fragments may be generated by tools and UIs, etc. The APIs and tools used to generate xDS configuration are beyond the scope of the definitions in this repository. * Use [wrapped scalar types](https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master/src/google/protobuf/wrappers.proto) where there is a real need for the field to have a default value that does not match the proto3 defaults (0/false/""). This should not be done for fields where the proto3 defaults make sense. All things being equal, pick appropriate logic, e.g. enable vs. disable for a `bool` field, such that the proto3 defaults work, but only where this doesn't result in API gymnastics. * Always use plural field names for `repeated` fields, such as `filters`. * Always use upper camel case names for message types and enum types without embedded acronyms, such as `HttpRequest`. * Prefer `oneof` selections to boolean overloads of fields, for example, prefer: ```proto oneof path_secifier { string simple_path = 1; string regex_path = 2; } ``` to ```proto string path = 1; bool path_is_regex = 2; ``` This is more efficient, extendable and self-describing. * To represent percentage values, use the Percent message type defined in [api/base.proto](api/base.proto). * For enum types, if one of the enum values is used for most cases, make it the first enum value with `0` numeric value. Otherwise, define the first enum value like `TYPE_NAME_UNSPECIFIED = 0`, and treat it as an error. This design pattern forces developers to explicitly choose the correct enum value for their use case, and avoid misunderstanding of the default behavior. * Proto fields should be sorted logically, not by field number. For large protos, place a comment at the top that specifies the next free field number. E.g., ``` // [#comment:next free field: 28] ``` ## Package organization API definitions are layered hierarchically in packages from top-to-bottom: - `envoy.service` contains gRPC definitions of supporting services; - `envoy.config` contains definitions for service configuration, filter configuration, and bootstrap; - `envoy.api.v2` contains definitions for EDS, CDS, RDS, LDS, and top-level resources such as `Cluster`; - `envoy.api.v2.endpoint`, `envoy.api.v2.cluster`, `envoy.api.v2.route`, `envoy.api.v2.listener`, `envoy.api.v2.ratelimit` define sub-messages of the top-level resources; - `envoy.api.v2.core` and `envoy.api.v2.auth` hold core definitions consumed throughout the API. Dependencies are enforced from top-to-bottom using visibility constraints in the build system to prevent circular dependency formation. Package group `//envoy/api/v2:friends` selects consumers of the core API package (services and configs) and is the default visibility for the core API packages. The default visibility for services and configs should be `//docs` (proto documentation tool).