In order to get file level move annotation, import has to be before options.
Signed-off-by: Lizan Zhou <lizan@tetrate.io>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 062c895f499382ae61dead16db2a7e78b9146525
Instead of formatting options heuristically, which will erase new annotations without changing protoxform, use proto descriptor to format options, and enforce its order as well.
Risk Level: Low
Testing: CI
Docs Changes: N/A
Release Notes: N/A
Signed-off-by: Lizan Zhou <lizan@tetrate.io>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ dfe687d49574ef7eb1bf84867bf571e805a2bf97
This patch moves away from the paradigm of sed-style upgrading of every v2
package to v3alpha. Instead, an additional type analysis phase is
performed prior to protoxform by a protoc plugin known as the "type
whisperer".
The type whisperer produces structured type dependency information for
each .proto. The tools/type_whisperer/typedb_gen.py tool then knits
these together to provide an API-wide type dependency graph. This is
then used to determine which types need upgrading (either they have
breaking changes or transitively depend on types with such changes).
Only packages with upgraded types now undergo the v2 -> v3alpha
transition.
The API type database is checked into
source/common/config/api_type_db.pb. This may seem a strange location,
but in the future we will include the type database as a build artifact
for the Envoy binary, as it will be used by the reflection-based version
converter to find the type upgrade path for input proto.
Risk level: Low (the v3alpha protos are not used yet).
Testing: fix_format, manual inspection of diffs, bazel test //test/...,
docs build.
Part of #8082Fixes#8490
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ ad57b58cfbb256af41a467260dce2a8013b7a7fa
Fixes#7982
Defines a package level proto library and its associated internal go_proto_library.
Deletes all existing api_go_proto_library, api_go_grpc_library, and go_package annotations in protos (they are not required and pollute the sources).
I deliberately avoided touching anything under udpa since it's being moved to another repository.
Risk Level: low
Testing: build completes
Signed-off-by: Kuat Yessenov <kuat@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ d504fde0ffd97017d1ddff8caa9a3b46bba9ae48
* api: add proto options for java
* add ci for checking proto options
Signed-off-by: Penn (Dapeng) Zhang <zdapeng@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 02659d411332e9f20d229f482931c15304ea17fd
This enables generating generic service stubs for all the data-plane-api
proto services when generating Java classes with protoc.
This is generally not needed when implementing a gRPC server but in our case we're implementing
it behind our legacy protobuf RPC framework which rely on these stubs. As far as I know the only negative
with enabling these is generating some potentially unnecessary Java classes.
Signed-off-by: Snow Pettersen <snowp@squareup.com>
There are several main changes in this PR:
Create envoy.api.v2.core packages to break circular dependencies from xDS on to subpackages on to base protos.
Create individual packages for each filter and add independent versioning to each filter.
Add visibility constraints to prevent formation of dependency cycles.
Add gogoproto annotations to improve go code generation.
After moving xDS service definitions and top-level resource protos back to envoy.core.api.v2, cycles were created, since the second-level definitions depend on base protobuf definitions, and are in turn included from xDS; however xDS and base definitions are in the same package.
The solution is to split the base protos into another package, envoy.api.v2.core. That eliminates dependency cycles (validated using go-control-plane).
Added a few gogoproto annotations to improve golang code generation.
Signed-off-by: Kuat Yessenov <kuat@google.com>
In support of https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/issues/2200 and some
Google internal needs, we are planning on adding support to Envoy to
allow a configuration (or possibly build) driven decision on whether to
using the existing Envoy in-built Grpc::AsyncClient or
the Google C++ gRPC client library (https://grpc.io/grpc/cpp/index.html).
To move in this direction, the idea is we have the xDS ApiConfigSources,
rate limit service config and other filter configurations point at a
GrpcService object. This can be configured to use an Envoy cluster,
where Grpc::AsyncClient will orchestrate communication, or to contain
the config needed to establish a channel in Google C++ gRPC client
library.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
data-plane-api(CircleCI)
Snow Pettersen
Kuat
ramaraochavali
htuch
alyssawilk