Stop generating v4alpha protos as it won't land in foreseeable future.
This fixes go-control-plane sync because of it fails to generate contrib API correctly.
Risk Level: Medium
Testing: CI
Docs Changes: N/A
Release Notes: N/A
Platform Specific Features: N/A
Signed-off-by: Lizan Zhou <lizan@tetrate.io>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ e453c6c613206da749e3ff645e2d92f534535f3e
* config/router/tcp_proxy/options: v2 API, boosting and --boostrap-verison CLI removal.
This PR cleans up a bunch of v2 tech debt, including version conversion and API oracle
code:
* Remove all non-trivial field references to hidden_envoy_deprecated_*. These were primarily
in tcp_proxy and router.
* Remove boosting, hidden type annotation and the API type oracle. We are now only v3 for
both resource and transport API version.
* Remove --boostrap-version flag (all boostraps already must be v3).
Risk level: High (It's possible there were some runtime guarded or not dependencies on
boosting).
Testing: Validated test functional coverage when removing hidden_envoy_deprecated_* field tests.
Releasing notes: TODO
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ d142c9d55ae9aab34e9924aa25f20bd27635e060
Follow-up to #17375 where it was agreed that protolock is not actively maintained enough to depend on. This PR "migrates" the tests from that PR to use buf instead, and also cleans some of the code per a few of the review comments. Still a few outstanding points:
- buf build on the envoy/api folder requires several protobuf dependencies such as udpa to be available to buf to consume. Suggested solution by buf is to point buf's config to necessary BSR modules that the buf team is hosting.
- These lines are commented out in this PR as I had some trouble automating it for the tests, and it is not necessary for the tests to pass
- May introduce issues if buf is not pointing to the same version of modules that bazel builds for envoy. May need to introduce some way to couple them, or (ideally) find a way to run the breaking change detector without building the dependencies
- Currently bazel is using a binary release of buf (for linux). Goal is to move to building it from source in the near future
- It may be in our interest to expand the list of API-breaking-change rules (buf provides an extensive list of rules we could adopt)
Risk Level: Low
Testing: Tests that evaluate buf against "allowed" and "breaking" protobuf API changes. Currently 4 tests are skipped - 3 of them are PGV-related (we need to communicate our desired PGV rules to the buf team so they may add them in the near future). The 4th is a test I had originally written to evaluate protolock but may not apply to buf ("forcing" a breaking change) - refer to comments
Docs Changes:
Release Notes:
Platform Specific Features: buf binary imported by bazel is linux-only. Hopefully the ["manual"] tags attribute prevents any issues for non-linux users
Signed-off-by: Yaseen Alkhafaji <yaseena@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ c74cebb3cc7dfb26488f7cac8eb9258cf9a7588e
Enables `LOAD_BALANCING_POLICY_CONFIG` enum value in `LbPolicy` and supports typed load balancers specified in `load_balancing_policy`. Continues work done by Charlie Getzen <charliegetzenlc@gmail.com> in #15827.
Custom load balancers specified by `load_balancing_policy` are created as implementations of `ThreadAwareLoadBalancer`. Thread-local load balancers can be implemented as thread-aware load balancers that contain no logic at the thread-aware level, i.e. the purpose of the thread-aware LB is solely to contain the factory used to instantiate the thread-local LBs. (In the future it might be appropriate to provide a construct that abstracts away thread-aware aspects of `ThreadAwareLoadBalancer` for LBs that don't need to be thread-aware.)
A cluster that uses `LOAD_BALANCING_POLICY_CONFIG` may not also set a subset LB configuration. If the load balancer type makes use of subsetting, it should include a subset configuration in its own configuration message. Future work on load balancing extensions should include moving the subset LB to use load balancing extensions.
Similarly, a cluster that uses `LOAD_BALANCING_POLICY_CONFIG` may not set the `CommonLbConfig`, and it is not passed into load balancer creation (mostly owing to its dubious applicability as a top level configuration message to hierarchical load balancing policy). If the load balancer type makes use of the `CommonLbConfig`, it should include a `CommonLbConfig` in the configuration message for the load balancing policy.
Considerations for migration of existing load balancers:
- pieces of the `ThreadAwareLoadBalancerBase` implementation are specific to the built-in hashing load balancers and should be moved into a base class specifically for hashing load balancers. As it stands, custom load balancing policies are required to implement a `createLoadBalancer()` method even if the architecture of the LB policy does not require a hashing load balancer. I think we would also benefit from disentangling `ThreadAwareLoadBalancerBase` from `LoadBalancerBase`, as the former never actually does any host picking.
- as we convert existing thread-local load balancers to thread-aware load balancers, new local LBs will be re-created upon membership changes. We should provide a mechanism allowing load balancers to control whether this rebuild should occur, e.g. a callback that calls `create()` for thread-aware LBs by default, which can be overridden to do nothing for thread-local LBs.
Risk Level: low
Testing: brought up a cluster with a custom load balancer specified by `load_balancing_policy`; new unit tests included
Docs Changes: n/a
Release Notes: Enable load balancing policy extensions
Platform Specific Features: n/a
Fixes#5598
Signed-off-by: Eugene Chan <eugenechan@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ e31bc1edec3bb80760a1442869cc442d123e9adc
Add a configuration option to use the value of an upstream-supplied
response header as the content length to allow streaming responses.
Risk Level: Low
Testing: Integration test for happy path and unit tests
Docs Changes: Inline documentation on new proto field
Release Notes: One line mention in version history doc
Platform Specific Features: N/A
Fixes#12957
Signed-off-by: Garrett Bourg <bourg@squareup.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ a63ab5436579b171bc85da8f3aa77a0c701d7f73
Mixing extensions with previously existing knobs leads to undefined behavior,
so this removes the deprecation around xff_num_trusted_hops and ensures that
it's not mixed with extensions.
Note that a unit test already exists for the original bug report, where
use_remote_address is used with xff_num_trusted_hops > 0. However it uses
the XFF extension instead of the old knob. Given this is now forbidden,
there's no need for additional tests wrt that config combination.
Fixes#17554.
Signed-off-by: Raul Gutierrez Segales <rgs@pinterest.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 57c172f8c3595b5f1e4b9ec9d56b7c8d7ec19c90
This is the last PR in the series dedicated to adding mirroring support.
It adds:
* the ShadowWriter which is used by the Router filter to mirror requests
* a ShadowRouter which is a RequestOwner that reuses the existing UpstreamRequest
There's still room for more code sharing and better interfaces, but that
can happen in future iterations.
Signed-off-by: Raul Gutierrez Segales <rgs@pinterest.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 7a93615ec1077bbb3b20ada1fc8a440751da1c9f
In order to unblock a dependency between route_components.proto and the matcher tree, move the alpha Matcher to
its own package. To provide an upgrade path for users using this, we'll keep the old copy around for a single deprecation
cycle.
Risk Level: Low
Testing: n/a
Docs Changes: n/a
Release Notes: Deprecation note
Signed-off-by: Snow Pettersen <snowp@lyft.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 40ed33327c23a9e4e88aec448694eb1d03098efd
This PR addresses several issues:
1. MetadataFormatter base class takes a pointer to a function to access specific type of metadata. All other methods operating on internals of metadata structure are moved to base class. This simplified adding new types of metadata.
2. new type of access_log METADATA tag is introduced to handle all types of metadata. It is implemented as formatter extension. It handles existing tags DYNAMIC_METADATA and CLUSTER_METADATA, so two ways of accessing dynamic and cluster metadata are allowed now. Maybe we should obsolete DYNAMIC_METADATA and CLUSTER_METADATA in the future?
3. Adds handler for ROUTE metadata. See issue #3006.
Follow up to #16121
Risk Level: Low
Testing: Unit tests.
Docs Changes: Yes.
Release Notes: Yes.
Platform Specific Features: No
Signed-off-by: Christoph Pakulski <christoph@tetrate.io>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 43b597e719230c8266998394301c5d0b3c862688
Implement the final unimplemented processing mode, which sends the
body in a single chunk if the entire body can be processed without
exceeding the buffer limit, or sends a chunk containing only the
part of the body that fits within the limit otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Brail <gregbrail@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ b6e72028c4be08e3e9926af970c10566d40d2841
When these fields were originally added, we didn't fully understand how the `CertificateValidationContext` configuration worked. A `CertificateProvider` cannot provide a full `CertificateValidationContext` proto; it provides only the CA certs (i.e., the `trusted_ca` field within the `CertificateValidationContext` proto). So this PR makes the following changes:
- Duplicates the `CertificateProvider` and `CertificateProviderInstance` messages from `CommonTlsContext` as `CertificateProviderPlugin` and `CertificateProviderPluginInstance` outside of `CommonTlsContext` (in common.proto instead of tls.proto). (Note that this also paves the way for reusing these messages for SPIFFE validation in the future.)
- Adds new `CertificateProviderPlugin` and `CertificateProviderPluginInstance` fields to `CertificateValidationContext`, as an alternative to the existing `trusted_ca` field. (Added annotations to make this a `oneof` in the future.)
- In `CommonTlsContext`, I have deprecated the `validation_context_certificate_provider` and `validation_context_certificate_provider_instance` fields both in the `validation_context_type` oneof and in `CombinedValidationContext`.
- In `CommonTlsContext`, I have replaced the `tls_certificate_certificate_provider` and `tls_certificate_certificate_provider_instance` fields with new fields that use the new messages outside of `CommonTlsContext`.
Risk Level: Low
Testing: N/A
Docs Changes: Included in PR
Release Notes: N/A
Platform Specific Features: N/A
Signed-off-by: Mark D. Roth <roth@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ b29d6543e7568a8a3e772c7909a1daa182acc670
use one destination port range rule to cover thousands of port rules in RBAC permissions, adding convenience for writing configuration and making matching quicker
Risk Level: Low
Testing: Unit
Docs Changes: N/A
Release Notes: Added
Platform Specific Features: N/A
Fixes#16039
Signed-off-by: Xie Zhihao <zhihao.xie@intel.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 0d2418e9f19d50197ed237dfe5497c715d3c99f0
Replace the confusing word with official defination
Signed-off-by: Le Yao <le.yao@intel.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 3a4baf64a5c300739b7ce47128c1e62fd2a38f33
Implement this mode, which allows an external processor to receive the body one chunk at a time and examine or modify the body while it is being processed.
Risk Level: Medium. The mode is only engaged if used. However an external processor must be coded carefully, particularly if it expects to stream both request and response bodies simultaneously, since each will proceed in its own ordering.
Testing: New unit and integration tests.
Docs Changes: Updated proto docs to reflect that the mode is now supported.
Release Notes: External processing servers may now use the STREAMED processing mode. In this mode, chunks of the body are forwarded to the external processing server when they arrive. Depending on how the upstream system is implemented, request body chunks may be delivered before or after the response headers, and request and response body chunks may be interleaved if the upstream system delivers them that way. An external processor should be carefully coded so that it does not assume that a particular ordering will be implemented.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Brail <gregbrail@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 271e67488b57bb600a1352c35aa9a7b8f1158441
#17110 the EnvoyMobileHttpConnectionManager but it turns out it's instantiated either as a standard network filter (needs a name) or as an API listener (which only accepted HttpConnectionManager)
Fixing both issues.
Risk Level: low
Testing: unit tests
Docs Changes: n/a
Release Notes: n/a
Part of envoyproxy/envoy-mobile#1540
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <alyssar@chromium.org>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 463eda2f3895fbb24c1fcd085a15d00d12a94079
1) Deprecate existing reuse_port field
2) Add new enable_reuse_port field which uses a WKT
3) Make the new default hot restart aware so the default is
not changed during hot restart.
4) Allow the default to be reverted using the
"envoy.reloadable_features.listener_reuse_port_default_enabled"
feature flag.
5) Change listener init so that almost all error handling occurs on
the main thread. This a) vastly simplifies error handling and
b) makes it so that we pre-create all sockets on the main thread
and can use them all during hot restart.
6) Change hot restart to pass reuse port sockets by socket/worker
index. This works around a race condition in which a draining
listener has a new connection on its accept queue, but it's
never accepted by the old process worker. It will be dropped.
By passing all sockets (even reuse port sockets) we make sure
the accept queue is fully processed.
Fixes https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/issues/15794
Risk Level: High, scary stuff involving hot restart and listener init
Testing: New and existing tests. It was very hard to get the tests to pass which gives me more confidence.
Docs Changes: N/A
Release Notes: Added
Platform Specific Features: N/A
Signed-off-by: Matt Klein <mklein@lyft.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ ba474ac375418d5529a30a9510a8ff5f0a5ada9a
Risk Level: low (config guarded code)
Testing: new unit tests
Docs Changes: n/a
Release Notes: intentionally not added
Platform Specific Features: n/a
Part of envoyproxy/envoy-mobile#1540
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Wilk <alyssar@chromium.org>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 8589ca86a4e937a57206b9be85d7faa9e8f0ca3d
Adding a core.v3.TypedExtensionConfig typed_dns_resolver_config for DNS resolver
in API definition. This configuration is to support DNS resolution as a first
class Envoy extension. This API change is the first step for that task.
This configuration is to replace above dns_resolution_config.
By default envoy supports c-ares DNS or apple DNS resolvers. This extension can be used
to configure other DNS resolver types.
This configuration is optional. In case it is missing, the default behavior is in place,
which means Envoy will either use c-ares DNS library or apple DNS library based on
the compiling flag. When this configuration is in place, Envoy will use the configured
DNS resolver carried in the extension typed_config field.
In case both typed_dns_resolver_config and dns_resolution_config are configured,
typed_dns_resolver_config take precedence.
Signed-off-by: Yanjun Xiang <yanjunxiang@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ b65b397652e5a627a9f3b0adcfe840d80dd57c03
Commit Message: jwt_authn: RemoteJwks to support RetryPolicy config #16319 ( only for background fetches failing )
Additional Description: following up on comments and code pruned from background jwks refresh mechanism from #16912
Risk Level: Low, default number of retries set to zero. truncated exponential backoff requires explicit configuration.
Testing: Only mock-based unit tests so far. Haven't been able to get it ( or the background jwks fetch option, for that matter ) built in [esp-v2](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/espv-2) so far.
Docs Changes:
Release Notes:
Platform Specific Features:
Fixes#16319
Signed-off-by: Anthony Lichnewsky <alichnewsky@users.noreply.github.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ b62dae29a5dd06b7f689899b26974d9567a98f0e
Commit Message: upstream -- allow clusters to skip waiting on warmup for initialization
Additional Description: this reduces server startup time, but might cause initial 500s for requests made on unresolved clusters. Further work might be needed there if operators use this new config option.
Risk Level: low - new config option. Default uses legacy behavior.
Testing: added unit tests
Docs Changes: added.
Release Notes: updated
Signed-off-by: Jose Nino <jnino@lyft.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ f2906f5ce372814b8e6f688a0e1766703d8b56f2
data-plane-api(Azure Pipelines)